IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i13p5479-d381424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public-Private Partnership Transformation and Worker Satisfaction: A Case Study of Sanitation Workers in H-City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Weixia Lyu

    (School of Government, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yanan Zheng

    (School of Government, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Camila Fonseca

    (Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jerry Zhirong Zhao

    (Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.
    Current address: Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, 301 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.)

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a rapid development of Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) as a new model of public service provision. Transitioning from bureaucrat- to market-oriented management of public services entails organizational changes that may affect employee satisfaction, and thus, PPP performance. We take sanitation services in H-City as a case study to explore the managerial factors that influenced worker satisfaction during the PPP transformation. Our research shows that motivation and transition factors influence worker satisfaction in the PPP transformation and may allow a smoother transformation of sanitation services. In particular, focusing on balancing workload and compensation, training, improving public attitudes, and adopting worker-friendly rules contribute to the satisfaction of sanitation workers. These findings will contribute to the transformation of the provision of public services in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Weixia Lyu & Yanan Zheng & Camila Fonseca & Jerry Zhirong Zhao, 2020. "Public-Private Partnership Transformation and Worker Satisfaction: A Case Study of Sanitation Workers in H-City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:13:p:5479-:d:381424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/13/5479/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/13/5479/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Mistarihi & Kate Hutchings & Arthur Shacklock, 2013. "Differing Opinions Do Not Spoil Friendships: Managing Public–Private Partnership (Ppp) Infrastructure Projects In Jordan," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 33(5), pages 371-388, December.
    2. Arindrajit Dube & Ethan Kaplan, 2010. "Does Outsourcing Reduce Wages in the Low-Wage Service Occupations? Evidence from Janitors and Guards," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 63(2), pages 287-306, January.
    3. Francis Green, 2004. "Work Intensification, Discretion, and the Decline in Well-Being at Work," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 30(4), pages 615-625, Fall.
    4. Rianne Warsen & José Nederhand & Erik Hans Klijn & Sanne Grotenbreg & Joop Koppenjan, 2018. "What makes public-private partnerships work? Survey research into the outcomes and the quality of cooperation in PPPs," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 1165-1185, August.
    5. Jean Shaoul, 2002. "New Developments: A Financial Appraisal of the London Underground Public-Private Partnership," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 53-60, April.
    6. Peoples, James & Talley, Wayne K. & Wang, Bin, 2008. "U.S. public transit earnings, employment and privatization," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 99-106, January.
    7. Jingfeng Yuan & Alex Yajun Zeng & Miroslaw Skibniewski & Qiming Li, 2009. "Selection of performance objectives and key performance indicators in public-private partnership projects to achieve value for money," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 253-270.
    8. Antonio Estache, 2006. "PPI Partnerships vs. PPI Divorces in LDCs," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 29(1), pages 3-26, September.
    9. Wang, Huanming & Ma, Liang, 2019. "Ownership, corruption, and revenue regimes for infrastructure partnerships: Evidence from China," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Matti Siemiatycki & Naeem Farooqi, 2012. "Value for Money and Risk in Public–Private Partnerships," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(3), pages 286-299.
    11. Jennifer M. Brinkerhoff & Derick W. Brinkerhoff & Anna Wetterberg, 2011. "Public–private partnership in labor standards governance: Better factories Cambodia," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 31(1), pages 64-73, February.
    12. Antonio Estache, 2006. "PPI divorces vs. PPI partnerships in Infrastructure," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/43914, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    13. Rosnani Mohamad & Suhaiza Ismail & Julia Mohd Said, 2018. "Performance indicators for public private partnership (PPP) projects in Malaysia," Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(2), pages 137-152, May.
    14. Wanger, Susanne, 2017. "What makes employees satisfied with their working time? : The role of working hours, time-sovereignty and working conditions for working time and job satisfaction," IAB-Discussion Paper 201720, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    15. Boya Zhou & Chunxia Sun & Hongtao Yi, 2017. "Solid Waste Disposal in Chinese Cities: An Evaluation of Local Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Muhammad Babar Ali Rabbani & Qaiser Iqbal & Ahsen Maqsoom & Waqas Farooq, 2021. "Construction Sector Contribution to Economic Stability: Malaysian GDP Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Hulya Dagdeviren, 2009. "Limits To Competition And Regulation In Privatized Electricity Markets," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(4), pages 641-664, December.
    3. Jamie S. Davidson, 2010. "Driving growth: Regulatory reform and expressways in Indonesia," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(4), pages 465-484, December.
    4. Palaco, Ileana & Park, Min Jae & Kim, Suk Kyoung & Rho, Jae Jeung, 2019. "Public–private partnerships for e-government in developing countries: An early stage assessment framework," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 205-218.
    5. Aidan R. Vining & David L. Weimer, 2016. "The challenges of fractionalized property rights in public‐private hybrid organizations: The good, the bad, and the ugly," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 161-178, June.
    6. Chang Liu, 2021. "Infrastructure Public–Private Partnership (PPP) Investment and Government Fiscal Expenditure on Science and Technology from the Perspective of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Zhao, Jianfeng & Greenwood, David & Thurairajah, Niraj & Liu, Henry J. & Haigh, Richard, 2022. "Value for money in transport infrastructure investment: An enhanced model for better procurement decisions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 68-78.
    8. Bas Scheer & Wiljan van den Berge & Maarten Goos & Alan Manning & Anna Salomons, 2022. "Alternative Work Arrangements and Worker Outcomes: Evidence from Payrolling," CPB Discussion Paper 435, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    9. Paulo Aguiar Do Monte, 2011. "Job Dissatisfaction And Labour Turnover:Evidence From Brazil," Anais do XXXVIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 38th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 135, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    10. James Spletzer & Elizabeth Weber Handwerker, 2015. "The Role of Establishments and the Concentration of Occupations in Wage Inequality," Working Papers id:7427, eSocialSciences.
    11. Ganserer, Angelika, 2021. "Non-compliance with temporary agency work regulations: Initial evidence from Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-057, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Georges Steffgen & Philipp E. Sischka & Martha Fernandez de Henestrosa, 2020. "The Quality of Work Index and the Quality of Employment Index: A Multidimensional Approach of Job Quality and Its Links to Well-Being at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-31, October.
    13. Basu, Arnab K. & Chau, Nancy H. & Soundararajan, Vidhya, 2019. "Wage fairness in a subcontracted labor market," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 24-42.
    14. Verweij, Stefan & Meerkerk, Ingmar van, 2020. "Do public-private partnerships perform better? A comparative analysis of costs for additional work and reasons for contract changes in Dutch transport infrastructure projects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 430-438.
    15. Dragoș Adăscăliței & Jason Heyes & Pedro Mendonça, 2022. "The intensification of work in Europe: A multilevel analysis," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(2), pages 324-347, June.
    16. Joshua D. Gottlieb & Avi Zenilman, 2020. "When Workers Travel: Nursing Supply During COVID-19 Surges," NBER Working Papers 28240, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. , Aisdl, 2020. "Employing Value Chain Theory To Address COVID-19 Outbreak In Tourism Management: A Resilience and Stakeholder View," OSF Preprints tmzvf, Center for Open Science.
    18. Demougin, Dominique & Helm, Carsten, 2023. "Overwhelmed by routine tasks: A multitasking principal agent perspective," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 654-669.
    19. Benjamin F Teresa, 2016. "Managing fictitious capital: The legal geography of investment and political struggle in rental housing in New York City," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(3), pages 465-484, March.
    20. Bergeaud, Antonin & Mazet-Sonilhac, Clément & Malgouyres, Clément & Signorelli, Sara, 2021. "Technological Change and Domestic Outsourcing," IZA Discussion Papers 14603, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:13:p:5479-:d:381424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.