IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i13p5390-d380090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Work Conditions in a Production Enterprise—A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Tutak

    (Faculty of Mining, Safety Engineering and Industrial Automation, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Jarosław Brodny

    (Faculty of Organization and Management, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Dobrowolska

    (International Center for Interdisciplinary Research, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

Abstract

A commonly used strategy in production enterprises is the idea of sustainable development. For an idea to be effectively implemented, it is essential to have competent and well-informed staff. This condition is necessary, but not sufficient. Still, the introduction of changes in the enterprise—including rational management of resources, as well as fair distribution of benefits and social development—requires acceptance on the part of employees. The implementation of this idea entails the need to introduce organizational changes, new technologies and innovative products. Currently, this direction in development is gradually beginning to determine the competitiveness of an enterprise. The present article discusses the results of a questionnaire survey in one production enterprise; the survey aimed at assessing work conditions. The research results were to show how the current changes related to the idea of sustainable development being implemented in this enterprise are assessed by the employees in the production sector. The obtained results are also to serve as a basis for developing a strategy for introducing further changes in this enterprise. The quantitative research included an evaluation of 24 research variables, which were divided into nine thematic groups relevant to work conditions in the enterprise. The research covered three basic groups of factors: work characteristics, human resource management policies and the social context of work. A global assessment of the enterprise’s performance was also undertaken. The research therefore focused on the practical aspects of the activity carried out by the enterprise. The results obtained should provide a basis for assessing the potential for introducing innovative solutions in line with the idea of sustainable development as well as improvements in human resource management. This basis is also particularly important for implementing such solutions in the enterprise which are in line with changes related to the concept of Industry 4.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny & Małgorzata Dobrowolska, 2020. "Assessment of Work Conditions in a Production Enterprise—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-35, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:13:p:5390-:d:380090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/13/5390/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/13/5390/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Molyneaux, Lynette & Brown, Colin & Wagner, Liam & Foster, John, 2016. "Measuring resilience in energy systems: Insights from a range of disciplines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1068-1079.
    2. Oyewole Simon Oginni & Adewale Daniel Omojowo, 2016. "Sustainable Development and Corporate Social Responsibility in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Industries in Cameroon," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Parakandi, Mohammed & Behery, Mohamed, 2016. "Sustainable human resources: Examining the status of organizational work–life balance practices in the United Arab Emirates," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1370-1379.
    4. Hilson, Gavin & Murck, Barbara, 2000. "Sustainable development in the mining industry: clarifying the corporate perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 227-238, December.
    5. Sugumar Mariappanadar, 2012. "The harm indicators of negative externality of efficiency focused organizational practices," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(3), pages 209-220, February.
    6. Woocheol Kim & Jiwon Park, 2017. "Examining Structural Relationships between Work Engagement, Organizational Procedural Justice, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovative Work Behavior for Sustainable Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Gholamhossein Hosseininia & Ali Ramezani, 2016. "Factors Influencing Sustainable Entrepreneurship in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Iran: A Case Study of Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Muhammad Dawood Idrees & Maria Hafeez & Jung-Yong Kim, 2017. "Workers’ Age and the Impact of Psychological Factors on the Perception of Safety at Construction Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Katarina Valaskova & Tomas Kliestik & Lucia Svabova & Peter Adamko, 2018. "Financial Risk Measurement and Prediction Modelling for Sustainable Development of Business Entities Using Regression Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 2010. "Building Sustainable Organizations: The Human Factor," Research Papers 2017r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    11. Hsiao-Ping Chang & Chi-Ming Hsieh & Meei-Ying Lan & Han-Shen Chen, 2019. "Examining the Moderating Effects of Work–Life Balance between Human Resource Practices and Intention to Stay," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Longoni, Annachiara & Golini, Ruggero & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2014. "The role of New Forms of Work Organization in developing sustainability strategies in operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 147-160.
    13. Sugumar Mariappanadar, 2016. "Health harm of work from the sustainable HRM perspective: scale development and validation," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(6), pages 924-944, September.
    14. Sebastian Kot, 2018. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management in Small and Medium Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Edyta Bombiak & Anna Marciniuk-Kluska, 2018. "Green Human Resource Management as a Tool for the Sustainable Development of Enterprises: Polish Young Company Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Kolk, Ans & van Tulder, Rob, 2010. "International business, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 119-125, April.
    17. Vera, Ivan & Langlois, Lucille, 2007. "Energy indicators for sustainable development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 875-882.
    18. Jack McCann & Matthew Sweet, 2014. "The Perceptions of Ethical and Sustainable Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 373-383, May.
    19. Jack T. McCann & Roger A. Holt, 2010. "Servant and sustainable leadership: an analysis in the manufacturing environment," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(2), pages 134-148.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicolas Murcia & Olivier Cardin & Abdelmoula Mohafid & Marie-Pascale Senkel, 2021. "Health-Related Parameters for Evaluation Methodologies of Human Operators in Industry: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Adiqa Kausar Kiani & Wasim Ullah Khan & Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja & Yigang He & Zulqurnain Sabir & Muhammad Shoaib, 2021. "Intelligent Backpropagation Networks with Bayesian Regularization for Mathematical Models of Environmental Economic Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Małgorzata Dobrowolska & Maria Flakus & Magdalena Ślazyk-Sobol & Adam Wawoczny, 2020. "Strengthening Professional Efficacy Due to Sustainable Development of Social and Individual Competences—Empirical Research Study among Polish and Slovak Employees of the Aviation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Paweł Poszytek, 2021. "Relational and Networking Character: Threat or Savior for the Sustainability of European Erasmus+ Projects in the Times of COVID-19 Pandemic?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Asta Savanevičienė, 2018. "Designing Sustainable HRM: The Core Characteristics of Emerging Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Asta Savanevičienė, 2018. "Raising the Curtain in People Management by Exploring How Sustainable HRM Translates to Practice: The Case of Lithuanian Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-31, November.
    3. Małgorzata Dobrowolska & Maria Flakus & Magdalena Ślazyk-Sobol & Adam Wawoczny, 2020. "Strengthening Professional Efficacy Due to Sustainable Development of Social and Individual Competences—Empirical Research Study among Polish and Slovak Employees of the Aviation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Monica Santana & Alvaro Lopez‐Cabrales, 2019. "Sustainable development and human resource management: A science mapping approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1171-1183, November.
    5. Hellen Ogutu & Youssef El Archi & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 11-45, March.
    6. Mónica Santana & Rafael Morales-Sánchez & Susana Pasamar, 2020. "Mapping the Link between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Human Resource Management (HRM): How Is This Relationship Measured?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, February.
    7. Edyta Bombiak & Anna Marciniuk-Kluska, 2019. "Socially Responsible Human Resource Management as a Concept of Fostering Sustainable Organization-Building: Experiences of Young Polish Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, February.
    8. Vickie Coleman Gallagher & Mary Wilson Hrivnak & Sorin Valcea & Christine Brown Mahoney & Diane LaWong, 2018. "A comprehensive three‐dimensional sustainability measure: The ‘missing P’ of ‘people’ – a vital stakeholder in sustainable development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 772-787, September.
    9. Astrid Kainzbauer & Parisa Rungruang, 2019. "Science Mapping the Knowledge Base on Sustainable Human Resource Management, 1982–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Jing Yi Yong & Mohd‐Yusoff Yusliza & Thurasamy Ramayah & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Simone Sehnem & Venkatesh Mani, 2020. "Pathways towards sustainability in manufacturing organizations: Empirical evidence on the role of green human resource management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 212-228, January.
    11. Kumari, Alka & Singh, Manvendra Pratap, 2023. "A journey of social sustainability in organization during MDG & SDG period: A bibliometric analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. HERCIU Mihaela & OGREAN Claudia, 2018. "Business Sustainable Competitiveness – A Synergistic, Long-Run Approach Of A Company’S Resources And Results," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 13(3), pages 26-44, December.
    13. Qaisar Iqbal & Noor Hazlina Ahmad, 2021. "Sustainable development: The colors of sustainable leadership in learning organization," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 108-119, January.
    14. Qaisar Iqbal & Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej, 2023. "Frugal innovation embedded in business and political ties: transformational versus sustainable leadership," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 2225-2248, November.
    15. Saqib Yaqoob Malik & Yukun Cao & Yasir Hayat Mughal & Ghulam Muhammad Kundi & Mudassir Hayat Mughal & T. Ramayah, 2020. "Pathways towards Sustainability in Organizations: Empirical Evidence on the Role of Green Human Resource Management Practices and Green Intellectual Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    16. Annibal Scavarda & Gláucya Daú & Luiz Felipe Scavarda & Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Caiado, 2019. "An Analysis of the Corporate Social Responsibility and the Industry 4.0 with Focus on the Youth Generation: A Sustainable Human Resource Management Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Eglė Staniškienė & Urtė Ciganė, 2020. "Sustainable HRM as a Driver for Innovative Work Behaviour: Do Respect, Openness, and Continuity Matter? The Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-29, July.
    18. Juan Herrera & Carlos de las Heras-Rosas, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Human Resource Management: Towards Sustainable Business Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    19. Paula Bajdor & Ilona Pawełoszek & Helena Fidlerova, 2021. "Analysis and Assessment of Sustainable Entrepreneurship Practices in Polish Small and Medium Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, March.
    20. Sainan Zhao, 2023. "Green HR Practices & Green Recovery Performance: The Mediating role of P-O Fit & Affective Commitment in Fast Food Industry of Pakistan," Energy Technologies and Environment, Anser Press, vol. 1(1), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:13:p:5390-:d:380090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.