IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i5p1503-d213240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Transshipment Container Terminals’ Service Quality in Vietnam: From the Shipping Companies’ Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Thi Yen Pham

    (Division of Logistics, Faculty of Economics, Vietnam Maritime University, Hai Phong City 180000, Vietnam)

  • Gi-Tae Yeo

    (Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University, 119, Academy-Ro, Yeonsu-Gu, Incheon 22012, Korea)

Abstract

Vietnam is a popular production base for multi-national companies and has become a hub for the global supply chain. Accordingly, to facilitate the increased demands on transportation and to satisfy customers’ complicated requirements, more attention has been paid to the service quality of container terminals. Thus, the aim of this paper is to investigate the service quality of transshipment container terminals in Vietnam from the perspective of shipping companies. The Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relation (CFPR) method has been introduced to solve multi-criteria service quality problems using both empirical data and expert knowledge. The results of this study illustrate that terminal accessibility and the proximity to a main trunk route are most important among the principal factors and sub-factors. Additionally, the TCIT terminal’s service quality ranks first among the top five container terminals in Vietnam. This study provides stakeholders with insight into competitive factors and risk factors for container terminals and their overall quality of service.

Suggested Citation

  • Thi Yen Pham & Gi-Tae Yeo, 2019. "Evaluation of Transshipment Container Terminals’ Service Quality in Vietnam: From the Shipping Companies’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1503-:d:213240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1503/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1503/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying Wang & Gi-Tae Yeo, 2018. "Intermodal route selection for cargo transportation from Korea to Central Asia by adopting Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy ELECTRE I methods," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 3-18, January.
    2. Salih YILDIZ & Emel YILDIZ, 2015. "Service Quality Evaluation of Restaurants Using The Ahp And Topsis Method," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, KSP Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 53-61, June.
    3. Brady, Michael K. & Cronin, J. Jr. & Brand, Richard R., 2002. "Performance-only measurement of service quality: a replication and extension," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 17-31, January.
    4. Athanasios Kolios & Varvara Mytilinou & Estivaliz Lozano-Minguez & Konstantinos Salonitis, 2016. "A Comparative Study of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods under Stochastic Inputs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Wolters, W. T. M. & Mareschal, B., 1995. "Novel types of sensitivity analysis for additive MCDM methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 281-290, March.
    6. Thomas L. Saaty & Daji Ergu, 2015. "When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1171-1187, November.
    7. Mateus Magala & Adrian Sammons, 2008. "A New Approach to Port Choice Modelling," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(1-2), pages 9-34, March.
    8. Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F. & Chiclana, F. & Luque, M., 2004. "Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(1), pages 98-109, April.
    9. Koi Yu (Adolf) Ng, 2006. "Assessing the Attractiveness of Ports in the North European Container Transhipment Market: An Agenda for Future Research in Port Competition," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 8(3), pages 234-250, September.
    10. Thi Yen Pham & Gi-Tae Yeo, 2018. "A Comparative Analysis Selecting the Transport Routes of Electronics Components from China to Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Yeo, Gi-Tae & Wang, Ying & Chou, Chien-Chang, 2013. "Evaluating the competitiveness of the aerotropolises in East Asia," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 24-31.
    12. Chinonye Ugboma & Innocent C. Ogwude & Ogochukwu Ugboma & Kenneth Nnadi, 2007. "Service quality and satisfaction measurements in Nigerian ports: an exploration," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 331-346, August.
    13. Chang, Young-Tae & Lee, Sang-Yoon & Tongzon, Jose L., 2008. "Port selection factors by shipping lines: Different perspectives between trunk liners and feeder service providers," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 877-885, November.
    14. Zheng, Jianfeng & Meng, Qiang & Sun, Zhuo, 2015. "Liner hub-and-spoke shipping network design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 32-48.
    15. Gelareh, Shahin & Pisinger, David, 2011. "Fleet deployment, network design and hub location of liner shipping companies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 947-964.
    16. Yi-Chung Hu & Ping-Chuan Lee & Yuh-Shy Chuang & Yu-Jing Chiu, 2018. "Improving the Sustainable Competitiveness of Service Quality within Air Cargo Terminals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    17. Haddad, Malik & Sanders, David, 2018. "Selection of discrete multiple criteria decision making methods in the presence of risk and uncertainty," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 357-370.
    18. Low, Joyce M.W. & Lam, Shao Wei & Tang, Loon Ching, 2009. "Assessment of hub status among Asian ports from a network perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 593-606, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jungwaun Jeh & Jungwoo Nam & Minseop Sim & Yulseong Kim & Youngran Shin, 2022. "A Study on the Efficiency Analysis of Global Terminal Operators Based on the Operation Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Zuo, Wenming & Bai, Weijing & Zhu, Wenfeng & He, Xinming & Qiu, Xinxin, 2022. "Changes in service quality of sharing accommodation: Evidence from airbnb," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Eunji Oh & M. Minsuk Shin, 2020. "Study Abroad in Support of Higher Education Sustainability: An Application of Service Trade Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Msabaha Juma Mwendapole & Zhihong Jin, 2021. "Evaluation of Seaport Service Quality in Tanzania: From the Dar es Salaam Seaport Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Jinsoo Hwang & Seong Ok Lyu & Sun-Bai Cho, 2019. "In-Flight Casinos, Is It Really a Nonsensical Idea? An Exploratory Approach Using Different Choice Experiments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Flitsch, Verena & Brümmerstedt, Katrin, 2015. "Freight Transport Modelling of Container Hinterland Supply Chains," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 233-266, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    2. Haddad, M. & Sanders, D. & Tewkesbury, G., 2020. "Selecting a discrete multiple criteria decision making method for Boeing to rank four global market regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Qu, Chenrui & Wang, Grace W.Y. & Zeng, Qingcheng, 2017. "Modelling port subsidy policies considering pricing decisions of feeder carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 115-133.
    4. Thi Yen Pham & Ki Young Kim & Gi-Tae YEO, 2018. "The Panama Canal Expansion and Its Impact on East–West Liner Shipping Route Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Vega, Laura & Cantillo, Víctor & Arellana, Julián, 2019. "Assessing the impact of major infrastructure projects on port choice decision: The Colombian case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 132-148.
    6. Thi Yen Pham & Gi-Tae Yeo, 2018. "A Comparative Analysis Selecting the Transport Routes of Electronics Components from China to Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Julián Martínez Moya & María Feo Valero, 2017. "Port choice in container market: a literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 300-321, May.
    8. Talley, Wayne K. & Ng, ManWo, 2013. "Maritime transport chain choice by carriers, ports and shippers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 311-316.
    9. Rui Cunha Marques & Álvaro Fonseca, 2010. "Market structure, privatisation and regulation of Portuguese seaports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 145-161, March.
    10. Yuen, Chi-lok Andrew & Zhang, Anming & Cheung, Waiman, 2012. "Port competitiveness from the users' perspective: An analysis of major container ports in China and its neighboring countries," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 34-40.
    11. Steven, Adams B. & Corsi, Thomas M., 2012. "Choosing a port: An analysis of containerized imports into the US," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 881-895.
    12. Zheng, Jianfeng & Sun, Zhuo & Zhang, Fangjun, 2016. "Measuring the perceived container leasing prices in liner shipping network design with empty container repositioning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 123-140.
    13. Yang, Dong & Pan, Kai & Wang, Shuaian, 2018. "On service network improvement for shipping lines under the one belt one road initiative of China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 82-95.
    14. Gohari, Adel & Ahmad, Anuar Bin & Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard & Gohari, Ali & Hasan, Razi & Sholagberu, Abdulkadir Taofeeq, 2022. "Significance of intermodal freight modal choice criteria: MCDM-based decision support models and SP-based modal shift policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 46-60.
    15. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    16. Wang, Jian & Zhu, Wenbo, 2023. "Analyzing the development of competition and cooperation among ocean carriers considering the impact of carbon tax policy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    17. Nguyen Tran & Hans-Dietrich Haasis, 2014. "Empirical analysis of the container liner shipping network on the East-West corridor (1995–2011)," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 121-153, November.
    18. Munim, Ziaul Haque & Duru, Okan & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2022. "Transhipment port's competitiveness forecasting using analytic network process modelling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 70-82.
    19. Vítor Caldeirinha & J. Augusto Felício & Andreia Dionísio, 2013. "The container terminal characteristics and customer’s satisfaction," CEFAGE-UE Working Papers 2013_14, University of Evora, CEFAGE-UE (Portugal).
    20. Mulder, J. & Dekker, R., 2016. "Will liner ships make fewer port calls per route?," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-04, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1503-:d:213240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.