IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i5p1338-d210798.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Responsibility Initiatives for Public-Private Partnership Projects: A Comparative Study between China and Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Osei-Kyei

    (School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Penrith NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Albert P. C. Chan

    (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Hum, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

  • Yao Yu

    (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Hum, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Chuan Chen

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Yongjian Ke

    (School of Built Environment, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney 2007, Australia)

  • Bashir Tijani

    (School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Penrith NSW 2751, Australia)

Abstract

Sustainability is a global issue and its enhancement through modern forms of procurements, such as public-private partnership (PPP), has become topical considering the huge impact of PPP activities on society, the economy, and the environment. However, one way of promoting sustainability thorough PPPs is the adoption of social responsibility (SR) initiatives/factors. This paper aims to empirically investigate the SR factors in PPPs through a comparative study between China and Ghana. An empirical questionnaire survey was conducted in both China and Ghana. Further, the mean score ranking, Kendall’s coefficient of concordance, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for data analysis. Results show that SR factors related to the economic efficiency of PPP projects and climate change adaptation are critical in China, whereas in Ghana, SR factors directly related to job creation and environmental protection are critical. The outputs of this study inform investors of the critical SR initiatives to consider when engaging in PPPs in Asia and Africa. In addition, they provide a solid knowledge base for the continuous international debate on how sustainability could be enhanced through PPP policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Osei-Kyei & Albert P. C. Chan & Yao Yu & Chuan Chen & Yongjian Ke & Bashir Tijani, 2019. "Social Responsibility Initiatives for Public-Private Partnership Projects: A Comparative Study between China and Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1338-:d:210798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1338/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1338/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yao Yu & Robert Osei‐Kyei & Albert Ping Chuen Chan & Chuan Chen & Igor Martek, 2018. "Review of social responsibility factors for sustainable development in public–private partnerships," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(6), pages 515-524, November.
    2. Michael Regan & Jim Smith & Peter Love, 2011. "Infrastructure Procurement: Learning from Private–Public Partnership Experiences ‘Down Under’," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(2), pages 363-378, April.
    3. Martins, Ana Cravinho & Marques, Rui Cunha & Cruz, Carlos Oliveira, 2011. "Public-private partnerships for wind power generation: The Portuguese case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 94-104, January.
    4. Robert Osei -- Kyei & Albert P.C. Chan, 2016. "Developing Transport Infrastructure in Sub-Saharan Africa through Public--Private Partnerships: Policy Practice and Implications," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 170-186, March.
    5. A. V. Thomas & Satyanarayana Kalidindi & K. Ananthanarayanan, 2003. "Risk perception analysis of BOT road project participants in India," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 393-407.
    6. Wuisan, Lindsey & van Leeuwen, Judith & (Kris) van Koppen, C.S.A., 2012. "Greening international shipping through private governance: A case study of the Clean Shipping Project," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 165-173, January.
    7. Peter Lund-Thomsen, 2009. "Assessing the Impact of Public–Private Partnerships in the Global South: The Case of the Kasur Tanneries Pollution Control Project," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(1), pages 57-78, May.
    8. Stella Kyvelou & Nektaria Marava & Georgia Kokkoni, 2011. "Perspectives of local public-private partnerships towards urban sustainability in Greece," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1/2), pages 95-111.
    9. Nilesh A. Patil & Dolla Tharun & Boeing Laishram, 2016. "Infrastructure development through PPPs in India: criteria for sustainability assessment," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(4), pages 708-729, April.
    10. Bart Bossink, 2002. "A Dutch public-private strategy for innovation in sustainable construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 633-642.
    11. Roehrich, Jens K. & Lewis, Michael A. & George, Gerard, 2014. "Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 110-119.
    12. Marta Marsilio & Giulia Cappellaro & Corrado Cuccurullo, 2011. "The Intellectual Structure Of Research Into PPPs," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 763-782, September.
    13. Igor Abramov, 2009. "Building Peace in Fragile States – Building Trust is Essential for Effective Public–Private Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(4), pages 481-494, March.
    14. Bossink, B.A.G., 2002. "A Dutch public-private strategy for innovation in sustainable construction," Serie Research Memoranda 0037, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    15. Esther Cheung & Albert P.C. Chan, 2009. "Is BOT the best financing model to procure infrastructure projects?," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(3), pages 290-302, April.
    16. Andrew Horsley & Chris France & Barry Quatermass, 2003. "Delivering energy efficient buildings: a design procedure to demonstrate environmental and economic benefits," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 345-356.
    17. Marques, Rui Cunha, 2017. "Why not regulate PPPs?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 141-146.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caiyun Cui & Meng Liu & Yong Liu & Bo Xia & Martin Skitmore & Guobo Han, 2021. "The Influence of Passengers’ Perceived Social Responsibility Efforts on Their Satisfaction in Public-Private-Partnership Urban Rail Transit Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Nannan Wang & Xiaoyan Chen & Guobin Wu, 2019. "Public Private Partnerships, a Value for Money Solution for Clean Coal District Heating Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Bisola Beatrice Oguejiofor & Ngozi Samuel Uzougbo & Abosede Olusade Kolade & Ahmed Raji & Chibuike Daraojimba, 2023. "Review of Successful Global Public-Private Partnerships: Extracting key Strategies for Effective U.S. Financial Collaborations," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(8), pages 312-331, August.
    4. Pascual Berrone & Joan Enric Ricart & Ana Isabel Duch & Valeria Bernardo & Jordi Salvador & Juan Piedra Peña & Miquel Rodríguez Planas, 2019. "EASIER: An Evaluation Model for Public–Private Partnerships Contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nannan Wang & Xiaoyan Chen & Guobin Wu, 2019. "Public Private Partnerships, a Value for Money Solution for Clean Coal District Heating Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Nannan Wang & Minxun Ma, 2021. "Public–private partnership as a tool for sustainable development – What literatures say?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 243-258, January.
    3. Guangbin Wang & Yingxia Xue & Mirosław Jan Skibniewski & Jiule Song & Hao Lu, 2018. "Analysis of Private Investors Conduct Strategies by Governments Supervising Public-Private Partnership Projects in the New Media Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Bossink, B.A.G., 2003. "Coinnovation research : manual for experiential research into organizational coinnovation," Serie Research Memoranda 0016, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    5. Katharina Spraul & Julia Thaler, 2020. "Partnering for good? An analysis of how to achieve sustainability-related outcomes in public–private partnerships," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 485-511, July.
    6. Jorge Fleta‐Asín & Fernando Muñoz, 2021. "Renewable energy public–private partnerships in developing countries: Determinants of private investment," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 653-670, July.
    7. Ying Li & Ronggui Ding & Tao Sun, 2019. "The Drivers and Performance of Environmental Practices in the Chinese Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Bossink, Bart, 2020. "Learning strategies in sustainable energy demonstration projects: What organizations learn from sustainable energy demonstrations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Lima, Sónia & Brochado, Ana & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2021. "Public-private partnerships in the water sector: A review," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Carmen Araquistain Portela, 2020. "Urban utilities and opportunities for the private sector in local energy services in Switzerland," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 21(2), pages 193-218, June.
    11. Lusekelo Yonah Mwakapala & Baiqing Sun, 2020. "A Simple Mediation Model for Public–Private Partnership Implementation in Developing Countries: A Case of Tanzania," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    12. Cheng Chen & Dan Li & Caixia Man, 2018. "Toward Sustainable Development? A Bibliometric Analysis of PPP-Related Policies in China between 1980 and 2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
    13. Bin Xue & Bingsheng Liu & Tao Liang & Dong Zhao & Tao Wang & Xingbin Chen, 2022. "A heterogeneous decision criteria system evaluating sustainable infrastructure development: From the lens of multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 556-579, August.
    14. Judit Oláh & Attila Bai & György Karmazin & Péter Balogh & József Popp, 2017. "The Role Played by Trust and Its Effect on the Competiveness of Logistics Service Providers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Love, Peter E.D. & Ahiaga-Dagbui, Dominic & Welde, Morten & Odeck, James, 2017. "Light rail transit cost performance: Opportunities for future-proofing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 27-39.
    16. Frank, Alejandro Germán & Gerstlberger, Wolfgang & Paslauski, Carolline Amaral & Lerman, Laura Visintainer & Ayala, Néstor Fabián, 2018. "The contribution of innovation policy criteria to the development of local renewable energy systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 353-365.
    17. Bossink, Bart A.G., 2017. "Demonstrating sustainable energy: A review based model of sustainable energy demonstration projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1349-1362.
    18. Rehner, Robert & McCauley, Darren, 2016. "Security, justice and the energy crossroads: Assessing the implications of the nuclear phase-out in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 289-298.
    19. Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Esposito, Emilio & Shashi,, 2019. "Exploration and exploitation in the development of more entrepreneurial universities: A twisting learning path model of ambidexterity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 172-194.
    20. Bilal Anwar & Zhongdong Xiao & Sharmin Akter & Ramiz-Ur Rehman, 2017. "Sustainable Urbanization and Development Goals Strategy through Public–Private Partnerships in a South-Asian Metropolis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-26, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1338-:d:210798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.