IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i2p471-d198510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of HOPSCA on Residential Property Values: Exploratory Findings from Wuhan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhijiao Qin

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, 129Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yan Yu

    (Department of Regional Planning and Management, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Dianfeng Liu

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, 129Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China
    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information System, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, 129Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Mixed-use development is theoretically considered to enhance the residential value of an area. However, limited empirical research has focused on European and North American cities. HOPSCA is a real estate project that integrates hotels, offices, parks, shopping malls, conference centers, and apartments. As an important mixed-use development project in Chinese cities, HOPSCA is designed to improve the quality of urban life and to enhance the residential value of an area. Few studies have explicitly examined the effect of HOPSCA on residential property values, let alone linked this question to particular types of HOPSCA. To bridge this research gap, we selected Wuhan City in China as a case study to explore the effects of HOPSCA on residential property values. Specifically, we used the potential model to quantify the effects of HOPSCA and used the geographically weighted regression (GWR) method to estimate the relationship between HOPSCA variables and residential property values. The results are as follows: (1) the effects of HOPSCA on residential property values are statistically significant with positive and negative effects. The balanced-development HOPSCA generated the greatest effects, with the highest premium of 10.76% placed on residential properties. Moderate price premiums of 3.57% and 1.83% were generated under the influence of the commerce-oriented HOPSCA and housing-oriented HOPSCA, respectively. By contrast, the business-oriented HOPSCA exerted a negative effect on residential property (−2.43%). (2) Significant spatial heterogeneity exists on the effect of HOPSCA on residential property values. The results showed that the influence of different types of HOPSCA, viz. the higher the compatibility between the HOPSCA type and the socioeconomic context of Wuhan, the higher the premium captured by residential properties within the city areas. HOPSCA benefits the improvement of the quality of urban life, which promotes urban development. For policy makers and real estate developers, our findings suggest that matching the development types and the spatial layouts of HOPSCA with the regional socioeconomic contexts is critical for enhancing the value performance of such projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhijiao Qin & Yan Yu & Dianfeng Liu, 2019. "The Effect of HOPSCA on Residential Property Values: Exploratory Findings from Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:471-:d:198510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/471/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/471/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Helbich & Wolfgang Brunauer & Eric Vaz & Peter Nijkamp, 2014. "Spatial Heterogeneity in Hedonic House Price Models: The Case of Austria," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 390-411, February.
    2. Hans R.A. Koster & Jan Rouwendal, 2012. "The Impact Of Mixed Land Use On Residential Property Values," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 733-761, December.
    3. Richard Peiser & Raymond Torto & Shohei Nakamura, 2017. "Are There Investment Premiums for Mixed Use Properties?," ERES eres2017_355, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    4. Markus Moos & Tara Vinodrai & Nick Revington & Michael Seasons, 2018. "Planning for Mixed Use: Affordable for Whom?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(1), pages 7-20, January.
    5. Yu Liu & Xi Liu & Song Gao & Li Gong & Chaogui Kang & Ye Zhi & Guanghua Chi & Li Shi, 2015. "Social Sensing: A New Approach to Understanding Our Socioeconomic Environments," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 105(3), pages 512-530, May.
    6. Giuseppe Arbia & Francesca Petrarca, 2016. "Effects of Scale in Spatial Interaction Models," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Roberto Patuelli & Giuseppe Arbia (ed.), Spatial Econometric Interaction Modelling, chapter 0, pages 85-101, Springer.
    7. Belcher, Richard N. & Chisholm, Ryan A., 2018. "Tropical Vegetation and Residential Property Value: A Hedonic Pricing Analysis in Singapore," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 149-159.
    8. Rosen, Sherwin, 1974. "Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(1), pages 34-55, Jan.-Feb..
    9. Waltert, Fabian & Schläpfer, Felix, 2010. "Landscape amenities and local development: A review of migration, regional economic and hedonic pricing studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 141-152, December.
    10. Manfred M. Fischer & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), 2014. "Handbook of Regional Science," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-23430-9, September.
    11. Rita Yi Man Li & Ka Yi Cheng & Muhammad Shoaib, 2018. "Walled Buildings, Sustainability, and Housing Prices: An Artificial Neural Network Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    12. J Black & M Conroy, 1977. "Accessibility Measures and the Social Evaluation of Urban Structure," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 9(9), pages 1013-1031, September.
    13. William M. Bowen & Brian A. Mikelbank & Dean M. Prestegaard, 2001. "Theoretical and Empirical Considerations Regarding Space in Hedonic Housing Price Model Applications," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 466-490.
    14. Diana Kusumastuti & Alan Nicholson, 2018. "Mixed-use development in Christchurch, New Zealand: Do you want to live there?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(12), pages 2682-2702, September.
    15. Benedetto Manganelli, 2015. "Real Estate Investing," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-06397-3, September.
    16. Laura O. Taylor, 2008. "Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Developments in Hedonic Modeling," Springer Books, in: Andrea Baranzini & José Ramirez & Caroline Schaerer & Philippe Thalmann (ed.), Hedonic Methods in Housing Markets, chapter 1, pages 15-37, Springer.
    17. Pooler, James A., 1995. "The use of spatial separation in the measurement of transportation accessibility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 421-427, November.
    18. Poudyal, Neelam C. & Hodges, Donald G. & Tonn, Bruce & Cho, Seong-Hoon, 2009. "Valuing diversity and spatial pattern of open space plots in urban neighborhoods," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 194-201, May.
    19. Geoghegan, Jacqueline & Wainger, Lisa A. & Bockstael, Nancy E., 1997. "Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 251-264, December.
    20. Mulley, Corinne & Tsai, Chi-Hong (Patrick) & Ma, Liang, 2018. "Does residential property price benefit from light rail in Sydney?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 3-10.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin Dong & Jiazi Li & Yingjun Xu & Youtian Yang & Xuemin Li & Hua Zhang, 2021. "Study on the Spatial Classification of Construction Land Types in Chinese Cities: A Case Study in Zhejiang Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Yunxi Bai & Jusheng Song & Shanshan Wu & Wei Wang & Jacqueline T. Y. Lo & S. M. Lo, 2020. "Comparing the Impacts of Location Attributes on Residents’ Preferences and Residential Values in Compact Cities: A Case Study of Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Yunes Almansoub & Ming Zhong & Asif Raza & Muhammad Safdar & Abdelghani Dahou & Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness, 2022. "Exploring the Effects of Transportation Supply on Mixed Land-Use at the Parcel Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, May.
    4. Cyprian Chwiałkowski & Adam Zydroń & Dariusz Kayzer, 2022. "Assessing the Impact of Selected Attributes on Dwelling Prices Using Ordinary Least Squares Regression and Geographically Weighted Regression: A Case Study in Poznań, Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Sylla & Tadeusz Lasota & Szymon Szewrański, 2019. "Valuing Environmental Amenities in Peri-Urban Areas: Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Sanglim Yoo & John E. Wagner, 2016. "A review of the hedonic literatures in environmental amenities from open space: a traditional econometric vs. spatial econometric model," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 141-166, March.
    3. Liu, Sezhu & Hite, Diane, 2013. "Measuring the Effect of Green Space on Property Value: An Application of the Hedonic Spatial Quantile Regression," 2013 Annual Meeting, February 2-5, 2013, Orlando, Florida 143045, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Pia Nilsson, 2017. "Are valuations of place-based amenities driven by scale?," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 449-469, May.
    5. Todd H. Kuethe, 2012. "Spatial Fragmentation and the Value of Residential Housing," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 88(1), pages 16-27.
    6. Yonglin Zhang & Xiao Fu & Chencan Lv & Shanlin Li, 2021. "The Premium of Public Perceived Greenery: A Framework Using Multiscale GWR and Deep Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Matthew Gnagey & Therese Grijalva, 2018. "The impact of trails on property values: a spatial analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(1), pages 73-97, January.
    8. Nakamura, Shohei, 2017. "Tenure Security Premium in Informal Housing Markets: A Spatial Hedonic Analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 184-198.
    9. Waltert, Fabian & Schläpfer, Felix, 2010. "Landscape amenities and local development: A review of migration, regional economic and hedonic pricing studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 141-152, December.
    10. Hao Huang & Jianyi Li, 2021. "The spatial variation of moderating effects of density and natural amenities on housing prices in Wuhan, China," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(6), pages 1778-1804, December.
    11. David M. Brasington & Diane Hite, 2005. "Demand for Environmental Quality: A Spatial Hedonic Approach," Departmental Working Papers 2005-08, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    12. Tapsuwan, Sorada & Polyakov, Maksym & Bark, Rosalind & Nolan, Martin, 2015. "Valuing the Barmah–Millewa Forest and in stream river flows: A spatial heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent (SHAC) approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 98-105.
    13. Sunak, Yasin & Madlener, Reinhard, 2012. "The Impact of Wind Farms on Property Values: A Geographically Weighted Hedonic Pricing Model," FCN Working Papers 3/2012, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN), revised Mar 2013.
    14. Fluvià, Modest & Rigall-I-Torrent, Ricard & Espinet, Josep Maria & Garriga, Anna & Saló, Albert, 2011. "Precios implícitos de los atributos de los productos turísticos: ¿Qué esconde el efecto de la localización?/Implicit Prices of the Attributes of Tourism Products: What is Hidden Behind Location?," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 29, pages 781-802, Diciembre.
    15. Thomas McGregor & Samuel Wills, 2016. "Surfing A Wave Of Economic Growth," OxCarre Working Papers 170, Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies, University of Oxford.
    16. Raymond Y. C. Tse, 2002. "Estimating Neighbourhood Effects in House Prices: Towards a New Hedonic Model Approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(7), pages 1165-1180, June.
    17. Biel E. Metz, 2015. "Effect of Distance to Schooling on Home Prices," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 45(2), pages 151-171, Fall.
    18. Brereton, Finbarr & Clinch, J. Peter & Ferreira, Susana, 2008. "Happiness, geography and the environment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 386-396, April.
    19. Beal-Hodges, Mary, 2012. "Conservation land acquisition lists and nearby property values: evidence from the Florida Forever programme," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 114(1), pages 1-8.
    20. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2017. "Spatial Agglomeration And Economic Development With The Inclusion Of Interregional Tourism," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 62(213), pages 93-128, April - J.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:471-:d:198510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.