IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i5p523-d554207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Spatial Classification of Construction Land Types in Chinese Cities: A Case Study in Zhejiang Province

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Dong

    (Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Jiazi Li

    (Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Yingjun Xu

    (Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    State Key Laboratory of Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Youtian Yang

    (Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Xuemin Li

    (Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Hua Zhang

    (Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    State Key Laboratory of Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

Identifying the land-use type and spatial distribution of urban construction land is the basis of studying the degree of exposure and the economic value of disaster-affected bodies, which are of great significance for disaster risk predictions, emergency disaster reductions, and asset allocations. Based on point of interest (POI) data, this study adopts POI spatialization and the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) algorithm to accomplish the spatial classification of construction land. Zhejiang province is selected as a study area, and its construction land is divided into 11 land types using an accurate spatial classification method based on measuring the area of ground items. In the research, the POI dataset, which includes information, such as spatial locations and usage types, was constructed by big data cleaning and visual interpretation and approximately 620,000 pieces in total. The overall accuracy of the confusion matrix is 76.86%, which is greatly improved compared with that constructed with EULUC data (61.2%). In addition, compared with the official statistical data of 11 cities in Zhejiang Province, the differences between the calculated spatial proportions and statistics are not substantial. Meanwhile, the spatial characteristics of the studied land-use types are consistent with the urban planning data but with higher accuracy. The research shows that the construction land in Zhejiang Province has a high degree of land intensity, concentrated assets, and high economic exposure. The approach proposed in this study can provide a reference for city management including urbanization process, risk assessment, emergency management and asset allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Dong & Jiazi Li & Yingjun Xu & Youtian Yang & Xuemin Li & Hua Zhang, 2021. "Study on the Spatial Classification of Construction Land Types in Chinese Cities: A Case Study in Zhejiang Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:5:p:523-:d:554207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/5/523/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/5/523/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Greenberg & Bernard D. Goldstein & Elizabeth Anderson & Michael Dourson & Wayne Landis & D. Warner North, 2015. "Whither Risk Assessment: New Challenges and Opportunities a Third of a Century After the Red Book," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(11), pages 1959-1968, November.
    2. Hualin Xie, 2017. "Towards Sustainable Land Use in China: A Collection of Empirical Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-9, November.
    3. Hailing Xu & Jianghong Zhu & Zhanqi Wang, 2019. "Exploring the Spatial Pattern of Urban Block Development Based on POI Analysis: A Case Study in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Aiman Soliman & Kiumars Soltani & Junjun Yin & Anand Padmanabhan & Shaowen Wang, 2017. "Social sensing of urban land use based on analysis of Twitter users’ mobility patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Zhijiao Qin & Yan Yu & Dianfeng Liu, 2019. "The Effect of HOPSCA on Residential Property Values: Exploratory Findings from Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhenchao Zhang & Weixin Luan & Chuang Tian & Min Su & Zeyang Li, 2021. "Spatial Distribution Equilibrium and Relationship between Construction Land Expansion and Basic Education Schools in Shanghai Based on POI Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Yirui Han & Qinqin Pan & Yuee Cao & Jianhong Zhang & Jiaxuan Yuan & Borui Li & Saiqiang Li & Renfeng Ma & Xu Luo & Longbin Sha & Xiaodong Yang, 2022. "Estimation of Grain Crop Yields after Returning the Illegal Nurseries and Orchards to Cultivated Land in the Yangtze River Delta Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Youtian Yang & Lin Dong & Jiazi Li & Wenli Li & Dan Sheng & Hua Zhang, 2022. "A refined model of a typhoon near-surface wind field based on CFD," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(1), pages 389-404, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Bo & Jin, Xiaobin & Sun, Rui & Li, Hanbing & Liang, Xinyuan & Zhou, Yinkang, 2023. "Understanding land-use sustainability with a systematical framework: An evaluation case of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Terje Aven, 2018. "An Emerging New Risk Analysis Science: Foundations and Implications," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 876-888, May.
    3. Barbara Kalisz & Krystyna Żuk-Gołaszewska & Wioleta Radawiec & Janusz Gołaszewski, 2023. "Land Use Indicators in the Context of Land Use Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Merkebe Getachew Demissie & Lina Kattan, 2022. "Understanding the temporal and spatial interactions between transit ridership and urban land-use patterns: an exploratory study," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 385-417, June.
    5. Anne E. Smith, 2018. "Setting Air Quality Standards for PM2.5: A Role for Subjective Uncertainty in NAAQS Quantitative Risk Assessments?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2318-2339, November.
    6. Yunes Almansoub & Ming Zhong & Asif Raza & Muhammad Safdar & Abdelghani Dahou & Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness, 2022. "Exploring the Effects of Transportation Supply on Mixed Land-Use at the Parcel Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, May.
    7. Wei Gao & Xiaoli Sun & Mei Zhao & Yong Gao & Haoran Ding, 2024. "Evaluate Human Perception of the Built Environment in the Metro Station Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    8. Arritokieta Eizaguirre-Iribar & Olatz Grijalba & Rufino Javier Hernández-Minguillón, 2020. "An Integrated Approach to Transportation and Land-Use Planning for the Analysis of Former Railway Nodes in Sustainable Transport Development: The Case of the Vasco-Navarro Railway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Michael R. Greenberg & Karen Lowrie, 2016. "Elizabeth Anderson: Cancer Risk Assessment Pioneer," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 646-649, April.
    10. Zhang, Yunyi & Gong, Pu, 2018. "IPV model with Cobb–Douglas and reference-dependent utility functions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 121-131.
    11. Yunxi Bai & Jusheng Song & Shanshan Wu & Wei Wang & Jacqueline T. Y. Lo & S. M. Lo, 2020. "Comparing the Impacts of Location Attributes on Residents’ Preferences and Residential Values in Compact Cities: A Case Study of Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Xiaodong Cao & Piers MacNaughton & Zhengyi Deng & Jie Yin & Xi Zhang & Joseph G. Allen, 2018. "Using Twitter to Better Understand the Spatiotemporal Patterns of Public Sentiment: A Case Study in Massachusetts, USA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Siliang Guo & Heng Ma, 2022. "Can the Spatial Function Division of Urbanization Promote Regional Coordinated Development? Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-28, June.
    14. Jing Wang & Yurui Li & Qianyi Wang & Kee Cheok Cheong, 2019. "Urban–Rural Construction Land Replacement for More Sustainable Land Use and Regional Development in China: Policies and Practices," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Yijie Zhang & Yating Feng & Yu Gao & Jinshan Wu & Longyan Tan & Honggang Wang & Ruoyan Wang & Xiaolei Niu & Yinhua Chen, 2023. "Effects of an Organic Amendment on Cassava Growth and Rhizosphere Microbial Diversity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Tine Bizjak & Davor Kontić & Branko Kontić, 2022. "Practical Opportunities to Improve the Impact of Health Risk Assessment on Environmental and Public Health Decisions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Chao Wei & Qiaowen Lin & Li Yu & Hongwei Zhang & Sheng Ye & Di Zhang, 2021. "Research on Sustainable Land Use Based on Production–Living–Ecological Function: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Dan Li & Yulei Weng & Xiaocong Yang & Kai Zhao, 2019. "Self-Deprecation or Self-Sufficient? Discrimination and Income Aspirations in Urban Labour Market Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    19. Jaehee Hwang & Jonghoon Park & Seongwoo Lee, 2018. "The Impact of the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Program on Rural Sustainability in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Sparks, Kevin & Moehl, Jessica & Weber, Eric & Brelsford, Christa & Rose, Amy, 2022. "Shifting temporal dynamics of human mobility in the United States," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:5:p:523-:d:554207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.