IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i1p202-d194603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Project Culture: A New Project Management Culture to Promote the Sustainable Development of Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Hailing Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Middle Section of South Second Ring Road, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Libiao Bai

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Middle Section of South Second Ring Road, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Ning Huang

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Middle Section of South Second Ring Road, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Qiang Du

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Middle Section of South Second Ring Road, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Tingting Zhang

    (School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, 161 Middle Chang’an Road, Xi’an 710061, China)

Abstract

With economic development and globalization, more organizations have been cooperating with foreign enterprises, which brings not only opportunities but also management difficulties and competitions with organizations. Organizations must improve their management and adapt to changing market conditions and the requirements and needs of its customers to maintain and strengthen its position in the market. Management by Project (MBP) uses technical methods of modern project management (PM) to manage various tasks and activities that are considered as projects. It is an effective way to solve management problems and improve management levels and enterprise competitiveness. However, few small and medium-sized enterprises apply MBP in their operation and management processes. Therefore, this paper presents a new idea to promote the application of MBP and the formation of a PM culture within society. In this paper, we searched a major database using the systematic literature review method and analyzed the articles directly or indirectly linked to our paper to obtain literature supporting the views of this article. First, this paper presents a new kind of management culture from the social aspect, termed as Social Project Culture (SPC), which can promote sustainable development and improve the management level and efficiency of organizations by promoting MBP application across society. Second, by analyzing the SPC definition, its three functions, i.e., project management behavior, management and risk control capacity, and international competitiveness, are provided. Then, to help organizations apply this method, an evolutionary path is proposed, including the creation stage, formative stage, mature stage, and heritage stage. Finally, to ensure the continued optimization of SPC, four safeguard measures in terms of theory, institution, behavior, and ideology are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hailing Wang & Libiao Bai & Ning Huang & Qiang Du & Tingting Zhang, 2019. "Social Project Culture: A New Project Management Culture to Promote the Sustainable Development of Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:202-:d:194603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/202/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/202/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pier Luigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2018. "From Culture 1.0 to Culture 3.0: Three Socio-Technical Regimes of Social and Economic Value Creation through Culture, and Their Impact on European Cohesion Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Frank Montabon & Mark Pagell & Zhaohui Wu, 2016. "Making Sustainability Sustainable," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(2), pages 11-27, April.
    3. Song, Fei (Sophie) & Montabon, Frank & Xu, Yuhang, 2018. "The impact of national culture on corporate adoption of environmental management practices and their effectiveness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 313-328.
    4. Łukasz Wróblewski & Bogusław Dziadzia & Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz, 2018. "Sustainable Management of the Offer of Cultural Institutions in the Cross-Border Market for Cultural Services—Barriers and Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mircea Constantin Duică & Nicoleta Valentina Florea & Anișoara Duică & Irina Antoaneta Tănăsescu, 2020. "The Role of E-Skills in Developing Sustainable Organizations and E-Activities in the New Digitized Business World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jung Eon Kwon & Hyung Rok Woo, 2017. "The Impact of Flipped Learning on Cooperative and Competitive Mindsets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Yiming Zhuang & Meltem Denizel & Frank Montabon, 2023. "Examining Firms’ Sustainability Frontier: Efficiency in Reaching the Triple Bottom Line," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Jamshed Raza & Yuxin Liu & Jianwei Zhang & Nan Zhu & Zohaib Hassan & Habib Gul & Sikander Hussain, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Management Practices and Sustainability Performance: The Dynamic Capability Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    4. Iteke van Hille & Frank G.A. de Bakker & Julie E. Ferguson & Peter Groenewegen, 2020. "Cross-Sector Partnerships for Sustainability: How Mission-Driven Conveners Drive Change in National Coffee Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Thomas Johnsen & Marie-Anne Le Dain & Nadine Kiratli & Holger Schiele, 2022. "Editorial: Purchasing and innovation: Past, present and future of the field of research," Post-Print hal-03761525, HAL.
    6. Desirée Knoppen & Louise Knight, 2022. "Pursuing sustainability advantage: The dynamic capabilities of born sustainable firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1789-1813, May.
    7. Srivastava, Saurabh & Singh, Shiwangi & Dhir, Sanjay, 2020. "Culture and International business research: A review and research agenda," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    8. Xiaoteng Ma & Ziyu Tang & Dan Wang & Hao Gao, 2020. "The Influence of Risk Culture on the Performance of International Joint-Venture Securities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Fahian Anisul Huq & Mark Stevenson, 2020. "Implementing Socially Sustainable Practices in Challenging Institutional Contexts: Building Theory from Seven Developing Country Supplier Cases," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 415-442, January.
    10. Hasan, Iftekhar & Jackowicz, Krzysztof & Kowalewski, Oskar & Kozłowski, Łukasz, 2023. "Cultural values of parent bank board members and lending by foreign subsidiaries: The moderating role of personal traits," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    11. Chi-Hua Wu & Yu-Lin Chao & Jia-Ting Xiong & Ding-Bang Luh, 2022. "Gamification of Culture: A Strategy for Cultural Preservation and Local Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Aline Pietrix Seepma & Dirk Pieter van Donk & Carolien de Blok, 2021. "On publicness theory and its implications for supply chain integration: The case of criminal justice supply chains," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(3), pages 72-103, July.
    13. Fehrer, Julia A. & Wieland, Heiko, 2021. "A systemic logic for circular business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 609-620.
    14. María-Angeles Rastrollo-Horrillo, 2020. "Strategic Decisions to Enhance the Internationalization of the Performing Arts and Their Sustainability: The Case of Flamenco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Sayantan Khanra & Puneet Kaur & Rojers P Joseph & Ashish Malik & Amandeep Dhir, 2022. "A resource‐based view of green innovation as a strategic firm resource: Present status and future directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1395-1413, May.
    16. Florian Lüdeke‐Freund & Stefan Gold & Nancy M. P. Bocken, 2019. "A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 36-61, February.
    17. Hsiao-Hsien Lin & Tzu-Yun Lin & Chun-Wei Hsu & Che-Hsiu Chen & Qi-Yuan Li & Po-Hsuan Wu, 2022. "Moderating Effects of Religious Tourism Activities on Environmental Risk, Leisure Satisfaction, Physical and Mental Health and Well-Being among the Elderly in the Context of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, November.
    18. Matthew A. Douglas & Diane A. Mollenkopf & Vincent E. Castillo & John E. Bell & Emily C. Dickey, 2022. "Journeys, Not Destinations: Theorizing a Process View of Supply Chain Integrity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 195-220, November.
    19. Susana Garrido Azevedo & Helena Carvalho & Luís M. Ferreira & João C. O. Matias, 2017. "A proposed framework to assess upstream supply chain sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 2253-2273, December.
    20. Tracy D. Johnson-Hall & David C. Hall, 2022. "Redefining Quality in Food Supply Chains via the Natural Resource Based View and Convention Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:202-:d:194603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.