IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4561-d259908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Three-Stage Hierarchical Model for An Earthquake Shelter Location-Allocation Problem: Case Study of Chaoyang District, Beijing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiujuan Zhao

    (Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Institute of Public Safety Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Jianguo Chen

    (Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Institute of Public Safety Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Wei Xu

    (Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Ministry of Civil Affairs & Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Shiyan Lou

    (Faculty of Finance, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China)

  • Peng Du

    (Institute of Public Safety Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Hongyong Yuan

    (Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Institute of Public Safety Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Kuai Peng Ip

    (Research Center for Macau Social and Economic Development, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China)

Abstract

Earthquakes are one type of natural disaster that causes serious economic loss, deaths, and homelessness, and providing shelters is vital to evacuees who have been affected by an earthquake. Constructing shelters with reasonable capacity in the right locations and allocating evacuees to them in a reasonable time period is one disaster management method. This study proposes a multi-objective hierarchical model with three stages, i.e., an immediate shelter (IS) stage, a short-term shelter (STS) stage, and a long-term shelter (LTS) stage. According to the requirements of evacuees of IS, STS, and LTS, the objective of both the IS and STS stages is to minimize total evacuation time and the objectives of the LTS are to minimize total evacuation time and to minimize total shelter area. A modified particle swarm optimization (MPSO) algorithm is used to solve the IS and STS stages and an interleaved modified particle swarm optimization algorithm and genetic algorithm (MPSO-GA) is applied to solve the LTS stage. Taking Chaoyang District, Beijing, China as a case study, the results generated using the model present the government with a set of options. Thus, according to the preferences of the government, the determination can be made regarding where to construct ISs, STSs, and LTSs, and how to allocate the evacuees to them.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiujuan Zhao & Jianguo Chen & Wei Xu & Shiyan Lou & Peng Du & Hongyong Yuan & Kuai Peng Ip, 2019. "A Three-Stage Hierarchical Model for An Earthquake Shelter Location-Allocation Problem: Case Study of Chaoyang District, Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4561-:d:259908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4561/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4561/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laijun Zhao & Huiyong Li & Yan Sun & Rongbing Huang & Qingmi Hu & Jiajia Wang & Fei Gao, 2017. "Planning Emergency Shelters for Urban Disaster Resilience: An Integrated Location-Allocation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    2. S. L. Hakimi, 1965. "Optimum Distribution of Switching Centers in a Communication Network and Some Related Graph Theoretic Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 462-475, June.
    3. Widener, Michael J. & Horner, Mark W., 2011. "A hierarchical approach to modeling hurricane disaster relief goods distribution," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 821-828.
    4. Bayram, Vedat & Tansel, Barbaros Ç. & Yaman, Hande, 2015. "Compromising system and user interests in shelter location and evacuation planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 146-163.
    5. Ting, Ching-Jung & Chen, Chia-Ho, 2013. "A multiple ant colony optimization algorithm for the capacitated location routing problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 34-44.
    6. Sherali, Hanif D. & Carter, Todd B. & Hobeika, Antoine G., 1991. "A location-allocation model and algorithm for evacuation planning under hurricane/flood conditions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 439-452, December.
    7. Saadatseresht, Mohammad & Mansourian, Ali & Taleai, Mohammad, 2009. "Evacuation planning using multiobjective evolutionary optimization approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 305-314, October.
    8. Kılcı, Fırat & Kara, Bahar Yetiş & Bozkaya, Burçin, 2015. "Locating temporary shelter areas after an earthquake: A case for Turkey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 323-332.
    9. Chang, Mei-Shiang & Tseng, Ya-Ling & Chen, Jing-Wen, 2007. "A scenario planning approach for the flood emergency logistics preparation problem under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 737-754, November.
    10. S. L. Hakimi, 1964. "Optimum Locations of Switching Centers and the Absolute Centers and Medians of a Graph," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 450-459, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reza Asriandi Ekaputra & Changkye Lee & Seong-Hoon Kee & Jurng-Jae Yee, 2022. "Emergency Shelter Geospatial Location Optimization for Flood Disaster Condition: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Bawan Mahmood & Jalil Kianfar, 2019. "Driver Behavior Models for Heavy Vehicles and Passenger Cars at a Work Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Shaoqing Geng & Hanping Hou & Jiaxin Geng, 2021. "The Mechanism of Operation Effectiveness of Emergency Shelter Rescue Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunjia Ma & Wei Xu & Lianjie Qin & Xiujuan Zhao, 2019. "Site Selection Models in Natural Disaster Shelters: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Xiujuan Zhao & Peng Du & Jianguo Chen & Dapeng Yu & Wei Xu & Shiyan Lou & Hongyong Yuan & Kuai Peng Ip, 2020. "A Typhoon Shelter Selection and Evacuee Allocation Model: A Case Study of Macao (SAR), China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Xiujuan Zhao & Wei Xu & Yunjia Ma & Fuyu Hu, 2015. "Scenario-Based Multi-Objective Optimum Allocation Model for Earthquake Emergency Shelters Using a Modified Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm: A Case Study in Chaoyang District, Beijing, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Ahmad Mohamadi & Saeed Yaghoubi & Mir Saman Pishvaee, 2019. "Fuzzy multi-objective stochastic programming model for disaster relief logistics considering telecommunication infrastructures: a case study," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 59-99, March.
    5. Lei He & Ziang Xie, 2022. "Optimization of Urban Shelter Locations Using Bi-Level Multi-Objective Location-Allocation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Kınay, Ömer Burak & Yetis Kara, Bahar & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco & Correia, Isabel, 2018. "Modeling the shelter site location problem using chance constraints: A case study for Istanbul," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 132-145.
    7. Yijun Shi & Guofang Zhai & Lihua Xu & Quan Zhu & Jinyang Deng, 2019. "Planning Emergency Shelters for Urban Disasters: A Multi-Level Location–Allocation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Wang, Qingyi & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2022. "A stochastic programming model for emergency supply planning considering transportation network mitigation and traffic congestion," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Özdamar, Linet & Ertem, Mustafa Alp, 2015. "Models, solutions and enabling technologies in humanitarian logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 55-65.
    10. Bell, Michael G.H. & Fonzone, Achille & Polyzoni, Chrisanthi, 2014. "Depot location in degradable transport networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 148-161.
    11. Li, Lingfeng & Jin, Mingzhou & Zhang, Li, 2011. "Sheltering network planning and management with a case in the Gulf Coast region," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 431-440, June.
    12. Esposito Amideo, A. & Scaparra, M.P. & Kotiadis, K., 2019. "Optimising shelter location and evacuation routing operations: The critical issues," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 279-295.
    13. Goerigk, Marc & Deghdak, Kaouthar & Heßler, Philipp, 2014. "A comprehensive evacuation planning model and genetic solution algorithm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 82-97.
    14. Wang, Qingyi & Wallace, Stein W., 2022. "Non-compliance in transit-based evacuation pick-up point assignments," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    15. Coutinho-Rodrigues, João & Tralhão, Lino & Alçada-Almeida, Luís, 2012. "Solving a location-routing problem with a multiobjective approach: the design of urban evacuation plans," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 206-218.
    16. Daoqin Tong & Alan T. Murray, 2009. "Maximising coverage of spatial demand for service," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(1), pages 85-97, March.
    17. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    18. Averbakh, Igor & Berman, Oded, 1996. "Locating flow-capturing units on a network with multi-counting and diminishing returns to scale," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 495-506, June.
    19. Laijun Zhao & Huiyong Li & Yan Sun & Rongbing Huang & Qingmi Hu & Jiajia Wang & Fei Gao, 2017. "Planning Emergency Shelters for Urban Disaster Resilience: An Integrated Location-Allocation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Knight, V.A. & Harper, P.R. & Smith, L., 2012. "Ambulance allocation for maximal survival with heterogeneous outcome measures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 918-926.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4561-:d:259908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.