IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i10p2949-d233876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Developers’ Green Procurement Behavior Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Shijing Yang

    (School of Civil Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Yikun Su

    (School of Civil Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Wei Wang

    (School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China)

  • Kaicheng Hua

    (Guangdong Huiqing Expressway Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510900, China)

Abstract

In recent years, environmental problems in the construction industry have become increasingly prominent and need to be improved. The production and use of building materials remain one of the main causes of various eco-environmental problems in the construction industry. Compared with traditional building materials, green building materials are environmentally friendly and safer to the human body. Therefore, the promotion of green building materials in the construction industry can handle the eco-environmental problems of the industry to a great extent, and promote the green and low-carbon development of the industry. As the main buyer of building materials products, developers shoulder the responsibility of promoting the development of green building materials. The research on the green purchasing behavior of developers is conductive to winning a good reputation for developers and promoting the sustainable development of the construction industry. However, few scholars have focused on the in-depth research on the impact of developers’ green procurement behavior. Based on the theory of planned behavior, this study analyzes the problem of the developers’ green procurement using the structural equation model in the way of the questionnaire. The results showed that subjective norms and perceived behavior control factors exerted a significant influence on developers’ green procurement (GP) behavior attitude. The subjective norm, perceived behavior control, and other factors indirectly affected developers’ GP behavior through behavior intention. The influence mechanism of perceptual behavior control on developers’ GP behavior is more complicated, and the degree of influence is the greatest among the three kinds of factors. According to the research results, this paper puts forward some suggestions to promote developers to actively implement GP behavior. The results help to promote the GP behavior of developers and promote the planning development of green buildings. In addition, on the basis of a quantitative theoretical model, this paper finds out the key factors that influence the behavior of GP from the point of view of developers, enriches the theory and method of GP research, as well as complements the related literature of GP research. Future research will explore GP behavior from the perspective of other stakeholders and from the developers’ internal level.

Suggested Citation

  • Shijing Yang & Yikun Su & Wei Wang & Kaicheng Hua, 2019. "Research on Developers’ Green Procurement Behavior Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2949-:d:233876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2949/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2949/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joanne Meehan & David Bryde, 2011. "Sustainable procurement practice," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 94-106, February.
    2. Linda W.P. Ho & Nicholas M. Dickinson & Gilbert Y.S. Chan, 2010. "Green procurement in the Asian public sector and the Hong Kong private sector," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 34(1), pages 24-38, February.
    3. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    4. Ageron, Blandine & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Spalanzani, Alain, 2012. "Sustainable supply management: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 168-182.
    5. Cruz, Jose M. & Wakolbinger, Tina, 2008. "Multiperiod effects of corporate social responsibility on supply chain networks, transaction costs, emissions, and risk," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 61-74, November.
    6. Mohamed Matar & Maged Georgy & Moheeb Elsaid Ibrahim, 2008. "Sustainable construction management: introduction of the operational context space (OCS)," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 261-275.
    7. Katie Williams & Carol Dair, 2007. "What is stopping sustainable building in England? Barriers experienced by stakeholders in delivering sustainable developments," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(3), pages 135-147.
    8. Dadhich, P. & Genovese, A. & Kumar, N. & Acquaye, A., 2015. "Developing sustainable supply chains in the UK construction industry: A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 271-284.
    9. De Boeck, L. & Verbeke, S. & Audenaert, A. & De Mesmaeker, L., 2015. "Improving the energy performance of residential buildings: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 960-975.
    10. Bai, Chunguang & Sarkis, Joseph, 2010. "Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 252-264, March.
    11. B. Ageron & A. Gunasekaran & A. Spalanzani, 2012. "Sustainable supply management : an empirical study," Post-Print halshs-00740499, HAL.
    12. Florence Crespin-Mazet & Emmanuelle Dontenwill, 2012. "Sustainable procurement : Building legitimacy in the supply network," Post-Print hal-02312717, HAL.
    13. Zhang, Xiaoling, 2015. "Green real estate development in China: State of art and prospect agenda—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-13.
    14. East, Robert, 1993. "Investment decisions and the theory of planned behaviour," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 337-375, June.
    15. Albert Ping Chuen Chan & Amos Darko & Ernest Effah Ameyaw, 2017. "Strategies for Promoting Green Building Technologies Adoption in the Construction Industry—An International Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    16. M. M. M. Teo & M. Loosemore, 2001. "A theory of waste behaviour in the construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(7), pages 741-751.
    17. Estiri, Hossein, 2014. "Building and household X-factors and energy consumption at the residential sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 178-184.
    18. Richard Hill & Paul Bowen, 1997. "Sustainable construction: principles and a framework for attainment," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 223-239.
    19. Akintola Akintoye, 2000. "Analysis of factors influencing project cost estimating practice," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 77-89.
    20. Phillip H. Phan & Poh Kam Wong & Clement K. Wang, 2002. "Antecedents To Entrepreneurship Among University Students In Singapore: Beliefs, Attitudes And Background," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(02), pages 151-174.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang Zhang & Fangfang Ye & Guangmin Zhang, 2021. "Determinants of Green Regeneration of Industrial Brownfield under Ecological Security Constraints: Model and Empirical Analysis Based on Grounded Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Guangmin Zhang & Yang Zhang & Wei Tian & Huimin Li & Ping Guo & Fangfang Ye, 2021. "Bridging the Intention–Behavior Gap: Effect of Altruistic Motives on Developers’ Action towards Green Redevelopment of Industrial Brownfields," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Xingwei Li & Jinrong He & Yicheng Huang & Jingru Li & Xiang Liu & Jiachi Dai, 2022. "Predicting the factors influencing construction enterprises’ adoption of green development behaviors using artificial neural network," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Yong Li & Yu Sun & Chengcheng Zeng & Jinxing Li & Yanping Gao & Haisheng Li, 2022. "Research on the Influencing Factors for the Use of Green Building Materials through the Number Growth of Construction Enterprises Based on Agent-Based Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Guolong Wei & Guoliang Li & Xue Sun, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Regulatory Strategy of Third-Party Environmental Pollution Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Bo Wang & Chunyan Huang & Huaming Wang & Fangwei Liao, 2022. "Impact Factors in Chinese Construction Enterprises’ Carbon Emission-Reduction Intentions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Heather Markham Kim & In-Hye Lee & Kyuhyeon Joo & JungHoon (Jay) Lee & Jinsoo Hwang, 2022. "Psychological Benefits of Purchasing Home Meal Replacement in the Context of Eco-Friendly TV Home Shopping Broadcast: The Moderating Role of Personal Norm," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Junling Jiang & Zhaoxin He & Changren Ke, 2023. "Construction Contractors’ Carbon Emissions Reduction Intention: A Study Based on Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Yi Gao & Gaosheng Yang & Qiuhao Xie, 2020. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Green Building Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.
    10. John Coffie Azamela & Zhiwei Tang & Owusu Ackah & Swanzy Awozum, 2022. "Assessing the Antecedents of E-Government Adoption: A Case of the Ghanaian Public Sector," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    11. Jolien Grandia & Dylan Voncken, 2019. "Sustainable Public Procurement: The Impact of Ability, Motivation, and Opportunity on the Implementation of Different Types of Sustainable Public Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Shabir Hussain Khahro & Aftab Hameed Memon & Nafees Ahmed Memon & Ali Arsal & Tauha Hussain Ali, 2021. "Modeling the Factors Enhancing the Implementation of Green Procurement in the Pakistani Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Leslier Valenzuela-Fernández & Manuel Escobar-Farfán & Mauricio Guerra-Velásquez & Elizabeth Emperatriz García-Salirrosas, 2023. "COVID-19 Effects on Environmentally Responsible Behavior: A Social Impact Perspective from Latin American Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Wenxi Zhu & Jing Zhang & Da Wang & Chongsen Ma & Jinfan Zhang & Pei Chen, 2023. "Study on the Critical Factors Influencing High-Quality Development of Green Buildings for Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Goals of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Xingwei Li & Jiachi Dai & Xiaowen Zhu & Jingru Li & Jinrong He & Yicheng Huang & Xiang Liu & Qiong Shen, 2023. "Mechanism of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control influence the green development behavior of construction enterprises," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Linlin Xie & Mian Huang & Bo Xia & Martin Skitmore, 2022. "Megaproject Environmentally Responsible Behavior in China: A Test of the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Cezar-Petre Simion & Ciprian Nicolescu & Mihai Vrîncuț, 2019. "Green Procurement in Romanian Construction Projects. A Cluster Analysis of the Barriers and Enablers to Green Procurement in Construction Projects from the Bucharest-Ilfov Region of Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    18. Alain Balaguer-Mercado & Samuel N. Kirshner & Chung-Li Tseng, 2023. "Sustainable Supplier Selection under Financial Hardships: The Conflicting Impact of Spatial and Temporal Psychological Distances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Wang & Shoujian Zhang & Yikun Su & Xinyang Deng, 2019. "An Empirical Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Adoption and Diffusion of GBTS in the Construction Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Shen, Liyin & Zhang, Zhenyu & Long, Zhijian, 2017. "Significant barriers to green procurement in real estate development," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 160-168.
    3. André Tchokogué & Jean Nollet & Nathalie Merminod & Gilles Paché & Véronique Goupil, 2018. "Is Supply's Actual Contribution to Sustainable Development Strategic and Operational?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 336-358, March.
    4. Ding, Huiping & Wang, Li & Zheng, Lucy, 2018. "Collaborative mechanism on profit allotment and public health for a sustainable supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 478-495.
    5. Minelle E. Silva & Breno Nunes, 2022. "Institutional logic for sustainable purchasing and supply management: Concepts, illustrations, and implications for business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1138-1151, March.
    6. Su-Yol Lee, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Digital-Based Supply Chain Integration, and Firm Performance: A Cross-Country Empirical Comparison between South Korea and Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Cuevas-Romo, Ana & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Díaz-Acevedo, Natalie & Albores, Pavel & Despoudi, Stella & Malesios, Chrisovalantis & Dey, Prasanta, 2022. "The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Mexican SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    8. Panda, S. & Modak, N.M. & Basu, M. & Goyal, S.K., 2015. "Channel coordination and profit distribution in a social responsible three-layer supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 224-233.
    9. Xia Zhao & Runsheng Yin, 2018. "Coordination of a socially responsible two-stage supply chain under price-dependent random demand," 4OR, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 379-400, December.
    10. Jung Seung Lee & Soo Kyung Kim & Su-Yol Lee, 2016. "Sustainable Supply Chain Capabilities: Accumulation, Strategic Types and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Alireza Karimi & Saeed Jafarzadeh-Ghoushchi & M. A. Mohtadi-Bonab, 2020. "Presenting a new model for performance measurement of the sustainable supply chain of Shoa Panjereh Company in different provinces of Iran (case study)," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(1), pages 140-154, February.
    12. Song, Wenyan & Xu, Zhitao & Liu, Hu-Chen, 2017. "Developing sustainable supplier selection criteria for solar air-conditioner manufacturer: An integrated approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1461-1471.
    13. Glover, J.L. & Champion, D. & Daniels, K.J. & Dainty, A.J.D., 2014. "An Institutional Theory perspective on sustainable practices across the dairy supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 102-111.
    14. Rasih Boztepe & Onur Çetin, 2020. "Sustainable Warehousing: Selecting The Best Warehouse for Solar Transformation," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 8(1), pages 97-110, June.
    15. Surajit Bag, 2017. "Identification of Green Procurement Drivers and Their Interrelationship Using Total Interpretive Structural Modelling," Vision, , vol. 21(2), pages 129-142, June.
    16. A. Mohammed, 2020. "Towards a sustainable assessment of suppliers: an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS-possibilistic multi-objective approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 639-668, October.
    17. Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Esposito, Emilio & Passaro, Renato & Shashi,, 2021. "Determinants of the transition towards circular economy in SMEs: A sustainable supply chain management perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    18. Bian, Junsong & Li, Kevin W. & Guo, Xiaolei, 2016. "A strategic analysis of incorporating CSR into managerial incentive design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 83-93.
    19. Bo Wang & Chunyan Huang & Huaming Wang & Fangwei Liao, 2022. "Impact Factors in Chinese Construction Enterprises’ Carbon Emission-Reduction Intentions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Raza, Syed Asif, 2018. "Supply chain coordination under a revenue-sharing contract with corporate social responsibility and partial demand information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2949-:d:233876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.