IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i12p4503-d186530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Effects of Public Service Facilities Accessibility on Housing Prices: A Case Study of Xi’an, China

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Lan

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Qi Wu

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Tao Zhou

    (School of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
    Research Center for Construction Economy and Management, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Huili Da

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

Abstract

The premium effect of public service facilities on the housing market is a critical determinant of housing prices, leading to the competition of different social groups in the housing market and fueling spatial inequality. Taking Xi’an, China as a case in point, this study uses Geographic Information System (GIS) to describe the spatial distribution pattern of housing prices and urban public service facilities. Using the mixed geographically weighted regression model (MGWR) and the geographical detector model (GD), this study reveals the spatial effects of these facilities’ accessibility on housing prices. The results show that commercial and leisure facilities are spatially stationary, whereas a non-stationary effect is observed among those providing educational, medical, cultural, sport, and financial services. From the urban spatial resource allocation perspective, facilities meeting people’s basic needs, such as medical care and education, constitute the basic elements of housing price differentiation. When any two of these interact, a bivariate-enhanced effect emerges. The decisive interactive elements of housing price differentiation involve the facilities meeting people’s higher-level needs, such as leisure, culture, sports, and finance. When these interactive elements interact with other facilities, a non-linear enhancement effect is induced. This research is of practical value for improving people’s living quality, optimizing the spatial distribution of public service facilities, and eliminating urban spatial inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Lan & Qi Wu & Tao Zhou & Huili Da, 2018. "Spatial Effects of Public Service Facilities Accessibility on Housing Prices: A Case Study of Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4503-:d:186530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4503/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4503/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Helbich & Wolfgang Brunauer & Eric Vaz & Peter Nijkamp, 2014. "Spatial Heterogeneity in Hedonic House Price Models: The Case of Austria," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 390-411, February.
    2. La, Vincent, 2015. "Capitalization of school quality into housing prices: Evidence from Boston Public School district walk zones," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 102-106.
    3. Ricardo Crespo & Adrienne Grêt-Regamey, 2013. "Local Hedonic House-Price Modelling for Urban Planners: Advantages of Using Local Regression Techniques," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(4), pages 664-682, August.
    4. Xia Feng & Brad R. Humphreys, 2007. "The Spatial Impact of Professional Sports Facilities on Residential Housing Values: Evidence from Census Block-Group Data," IASE Conference Papers 0719, International Association of Sports Economists.
    5. Andreyeva, Elena & Patrick, Carlianne, 2017. "Paying for priority in school choice: Capitalization effects of charter school admission zones," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 19-32.
    6. Jin Han Park & Dong Kun Lee & Chan Park & Ho Gul Kim & Tae Yong Jung & Songyi Kim, 2017. "Park Accessibility Impacts Housing Prices in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Stephen Gibbons & Susana Mourato & Guilherme Resende, 2014. "The Amenity Value of English Nature: A Hedonic Price Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 57(2), pages 175-196, February.
    8. Yan Xu & Weixuan Song & Chunhui Liu, 2018. "Social-Spatial Accessibility to Urban Educational Resources under the School District System: A Case Study of Public Primary Schools in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Haizhen Wen & Zaiyuan Gui & Chuanhao Tian & Yue Xiao & Li Fang, 2018. "Subway Opening, Traffic Accessibility, and Housing Prices: A Quantile Hedonic Analysis in Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Qiyan Wu & Xiaoling Zhang & Paul Waley, 2016. "Jiaoyufication: When gentrification goes to school in the Chinese inner city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(16), pages 3510-3526, December.
    11. Dean Hanink & Robert Cromley & Avraham Ebenstein, 2012. "Spatial Variation in the Determinants of House Prices and Apartment Rents in China," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 347-363, August.
    12. Feng, Hao & Lu, Ming, 2013. "School quality and housing prices: Empirical evidence from a natural experiment in Shanghai, China," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 291-307.
    13. Weizeng Sun & Yuming Fu & Siqi Zheng, 2017. "Local Public Service Provision And Spatial Inequality In Chinese Cities: The Role Of Residential Income Sorting And Land-Use Conditions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 547-567, September.
    14. Kuang, Chun, 2017. "Does quality matter in local consumption amenities? An empirical investigation with Yelp," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 1-18.
    15. Kenneth A. Small & Seiji S.C. Steimetz, 2012. "Spatial Hedonics And The Willingness To Pay For Residential Amenities," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 635-647, October.
    16. Weixuan Song & Chunhui Liu, 2017. "Spatial differentiation of gated communities in Nanjing," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 312-325, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amer Habibullah & Nawaf Alhajaj & Ahmad Fallatah, 2022. "One-Kilometer Walking Limit during COVID-19: Evaluating Accessibility to Residential Public Open Spaces in a Major Saudi City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Fuqiang Dai & Hao Liu & Xia Zhang & Qing Li, 2022. "Does the Equalization of Public Services Effect Regional Disparities in the Ratio of Investment to Consumption? Evidence From Provincial Level in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    3. Hanli Chen & Yu Zhang & Ningxin Zhang & Man Zhou & Heping Ding, 2022. "Analysis on the Spatial Effect of Infrastructure Development on the Real Estate Price in the Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Xuefeng Tan & Chenggen Guo & Pu Sun, 2023. "Study on Rationality of Public Fitness Service Facilities in Beijing Based on GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Yunjong Kim & Seungwoo Choi & Mun Yong Yi, 2020. "Applying Comparable Sales Method to the Automated Estimation of Real Estate Prices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Wenjie Chen & Xiaogang Wu & Zhu Xiao, 2023. "Impact of Built Environment on Carbon Emissions from Cross-District Mobility: A Social Network Analysis Based on Private Vehicle Trajectory Big Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Peishen Wu & Mei Liu, 2022. "A Framework for the Spatial Inequality in Urban Public Facility for Urban Planning, Design and Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Hyunwoo Lim & Minyoung Park, 2019. "Modeling the Spatial Dimensions of Warehouse Rent Determinants: A Case Study of Seoul Metropolitan Area, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Linlin Zhang & Tao Zhou & Chao Mao, 2019. "Does the Difference in Urban Public Facility Allocation Cause Spatial Inequality in Housing Prices? Evidence from Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Wei Liu & Jingxuan Zhang & Long Qian, 2022. "Measuring Community Resilience and Its Determinants: Relocated Vulnerable Community in Western China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Yuchen Zhou & Yuhong Tian & Chi Yung Jim & Xu Liu & Jingya Luan & Mengxuan Yan, 2022. "Effects of Public Transport Accessibility and Property Attributes on Housing Prices in Polycentric Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Liguo Zeng & Chunqing Liu, 2023. "Exploring Factors Affecting Urban Park Use from a Geospatial Perspective: A Big Data Study in Fuzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Kangxu Wang & Weifeng Wang & Tongtong Li & Shengjun Wen & Xin Fu & Xinhao Wang, 2023. "Optimizing Living Service Amenities for Diverse Urban Residents: A Supply and Demand Balancing Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Seungwoo Choi & Mun Yong Yi, 2021. "Computational Valuation Model of Housing Price Using Pseudo Self Comparison Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    15. Yuqiu Jia & Zhenhua Zheng & Qi Zhang & Min Li & Xiaofang Liu, 2020. "Associations of Spatial Aggregation between Neighborhood Facilities and the Population of Age Groups Based on Points-of-Interest Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    16. Sisman, S. & Aydinoglu, A.C., 2022. "A modelling approach with geographically weighted regression methods for determining geographic variation and influencing factors in housing price: A case in Istanbul," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Yu Zheng & Shan Wang & Jinli Zhu & Shuo Huang & Linli Cheng & Jianwen Dong & Yuxiang Sun, 2023. "A Comprehensive Evaluation of Supply and Demand in Urban Parks along “Luck Greenway” in Fuzhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Stanislav Endel & Marek Teichmann & Dagmar Kutá, 2020. "Possibilities of House Valuation Automation in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-13, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao Tian & Jin Liu & Yong Liu, 2022. "How Does the Quality of Junior High Schools Affect Housing Prices? A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on the Admission Reform in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Kang Mo Koo & Jerry Liang, 2021. "The Effect of Bilingual Education on Housing Price-a Case Study of Bilingual School Conversion," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 629-664, May.
    3. Peng, Ying & Tian, Chuanhao & Wen, Haizhen, 2021. "How does school district adjustment affect housing prices: An empirical investigation from Hangzhou, China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Rajapaksa, Darshana & Gono, Marcel & Wilson, Clevo & Managi, Shunsuke & Lee, Boon & Hoang, Viet-Ngu, 2020. "The demand for education: The impacts of good schools on property values in Brisbane, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. Yang, Ziqi & Li, Xinghua & Guo, Yuntao & Qian, Xinwu, 2023. "Understanding active transportation accessibility's impacts on polycentric and monocentric cities' housing price," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Ding, Kangzhe & Itoh, Ryo, 2023. "JUE Insight: The impact of the school admission restriction policy on the housing market in Shanghai," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    7. Wouter Vermeulen & Jan Rouwendal, 2014. "On The Value Of Foregone Open Space In Sprawling Cities," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 61-69, January.
    8. Mats Wilhelmsson, 2022. "About the Importance of Planning the Location of Recycling Stations in the Urban Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Cyprian Chwiałkowski & Adam Zydroń, 2021. "Socio-Economic and Spatial Characteristics of Wielkopolski National Park: Application of the Hedonic Pricing Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Linlin Zhang & Tao Zhou & Chao Mao, 2019. "Does the Difference in Urban Public Facility Allocation Cause Spatial Inequality in Housing Prices? Evidence from Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Xiao, Yue & Wen, Haizhen & Hui, Eddie C.M. & Zhou, Ganghua, 2022. "Dynamic capitalization effects of educational facilities during different market stages: An empirical study in Hangzhou, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    12. Pengyu Zhu & Yi Zhang & Juan Wang, 2023. "Canceling the admission priority of private schools enlarges housing price gap in public school districts: Evidence from Shanghai's new admission policy," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 51(1), pages 49-67, January.
    13. Yuan, Feng & Wu, Jiawei & Wei, Yehua Dennis & Wang, Lei, 2018. "Policy change, amenity, and spatiotemporal dynamics of housing prices in Nanjing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 225-236.
    14. Michio Naoi, 2020. "School Quality and Residential Property Values: A Review of Recent Developments and Applications," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, September.
    15. Matthew Gnagey & Therese Grijalva, 2018. "The impact of trails on property values: a spatial analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(1), pages 73-97, January.
    16. Touseef Hussain & Jaffar Abbas & Zou Wei & Mohammad Nurunnabi, 2019. "The Effect of Sustainable Urban Planning and Slum Disamenity on The Value of Neighboring Residential Property: Application of The Hedonic Pricing Model in Rent Price Appraisal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Hu, Lirong & He, Shenjing & Luo, Yun & Su, Shiliang & Xin, Jing & Weng, Min, 2020. "A social-media-based approach to assessing the effectiveness of equitable housing policy in mitigating education accessibility induced social inequalities in Shanghai, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Bello Musa Zango & Sanni Mohammed Lekan & Mohammed Jibrin Katun, 2020. "Conventional Methods in Housing Market Analysis: A Review of Literature," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 227-241, January.
    19. Allan Beltrán & David Maddison & Robert J. R. Elliott, 2018. "Assessing the Economic Benefits of Flood Defenses: A Repeat‐Sales Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2340-2367, November.
    20. Tapsuwan, Sorada & Polyakov, Maksym & Bark, Rosalind & Nolan, Martin, 2015. "Valuing the Barmah–Millewa Forest and in stream river flows: A spatial heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent (SHAC) approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 98-105.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4503-:d:186530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.