IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i10p3688-d175637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Human-Centered Approach to Green Apparel Advertising: Decision Tree Predictive Modeling of Consumer Choice

Author

Listed:
  • So Young Song

    (Department of Merchandising, University College, The University of Memphis, 408B Manning Hall Building, Memphis, TN 38152, USA)

  • Youn-Kyung Kim

    (Department of Retail, Hospitality and Tourism Management, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 110 Jessie Harris Building, 1215 W. Cumberland Avenue, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)

Abstract

This study uses a human-centered approach to environmental ethics to examine which perceived factors in advertising predict consumers’ intention to purchase “green”, or sustainably and ethically produced, apparel. We use eight different types of green apparel advertisements to build a decision tree model to determine the most influential factors that lead to future purchases of green apparel. We classify consumers’ perceptions of green advertising as either humanistic, environmental, or product-related responses and propose a conceptual framework to outline the essential elements of an effective green advertising strategy. We use a sample of 829 US consumers from the period January 2015 to December 2017 in our empirical research. Our results show that four factors, namely, perception of the apparel’s quality, its uniqueness, caring, and nature connectedness, predict consumers’ intention to purchase green apparel. Notably, the largest segment of consumers (36%), those who perceive high levels of apparel quality and caring in the advertising, are identified as the high-purchase group. Our findings could improve strategies in green apparel advertising by providing a new analytical approach to model consumers’ behavioral intention to purchase green apparel.

Suggested Citation

  • So Young Song & Youn-Kyung Kim, 2018. "A Human-Centered Approach to Green Apparel Advertising: Decision Tree Predictive Modeling of Consumer Choice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3688-:d:175637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3688/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3688/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gergely Nyilasy & Harsha Gangadharbatla & Angela Paladino, 2014. "Perceived Greenwashing: The Interactive Effects of Green Advertising and Corporate Environmental Performance on Consumer Reactions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(4), pages 693-707, December.
    2. Starr, Martha A., 2009. "The social economics of ethical consumption: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 916-925, December.
    3. Cason, Timothy N. & Gangadharan, Lata, 2002. "Environmental Labeling and Incomplete Consumer Information in Laboratory Markets," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 113-134, January.
    4. Simona Romani & Silvia Grappi & Richard Bagozzi, 2013. "Explaining Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Gratitude and Altruistic Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 193-206, May.
    5. Netemeyer, Richard G. & Krishnan, Balaji & Pullig, Chris & Wang, Guangping & Yagci, Mehmet & Dean, Dwane & Ricks, Joe & Wirth, Ferdinand, 2004. "Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand equity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 209-224, February.
    6. Keith Zullig & Rose Ward & Thelma Horn, 2006. "The Association Between Perceived Spirituality, Religiosity, and Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Self-Rated Health," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 79(2), pages 255-274, November.
    7. Rosa Dangelico & Devashish Pujari, 2010. "Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 471-486, September.
    8. Andreu, Luisa & Casado-Díaz, Ana B. & Mattila, Anna S., 2015. "Effects of message appeal and service type in CSR communication strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1488-1495.
    9. Minton, Elizabeth A. & Kahle, Lynn R. & Kim, Chung-Hyun, 2015. "Religion and motives for sustainable behaviors: A cross-cultural comparison and contrast," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1937-1944.
    10. Yang, Defeng & Lu, Yue & Zhu, Wenting & Su, Chenting, 2015. "Going green: How different advertising appeals impact green consumption behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2663-2675.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruirui Zhang & Joseph D’Andrea & Chunmin Lang, 2023. "Gifts and Commodities: A Dialectical Thought Experiment for Sublation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Arthur Cheng-Hsui Chen & Hsiu-Hui Wu, 2020. "How Should Green Messages Be Framed: Single or Double?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Song, Christina Soyoung & Kim, Youn-Kyung, 2021. "Predictors of consumers’ willingness to share personal information with fashion sales robots," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Dooyoung Choi & Ha Kyung Lee, 2020. "Beneficiary Foci Types and Performance Appeals in Green Advertising," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Bei Wang & Alina M. Udall, 2023. "Sustainable Consumer Behaviors: The Effects of Identity, Environment Value and Marketing Promotion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    6. So Young Song & Youn-Kyung Kim, 2019. "Doing Good Better: Impure Altruism in Green Apparel Advertising," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Elizabeth Emperatriz García-Salirrosas & Rafael Fernando Rondon-Eusebio, 2022. "Green Marketing Practices Related to Key Variables of Consumer Purchasing Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Thorey S Thorisdottir & Lara Johannsdottir, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility Influencing Sustainability within the Fashion Industry. A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-64, November.
    9. Mark Anthony Camilleri & Livio Cricelli & Roberto Mauriello & Serena Strazzullo, 2023. "Consumer Perceptions of Sustainable Products: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Magdalena Iordache Platis & Cosmin Olteanu & Anca Luiza Hotoi, 2022. "Evolution of the Online Sales of Sustainable Products in the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rizzi, Francesco & Gigliotti, Marina & Runfola, Andrea & Ferrucci, Luca, 2022. "Don't miss the boat when consumers are in-store! Exploring the use of point-of-purchase displays to promote green and non-green products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Mahabubur Rahman & Saqib Aziz & Mathew Hughes, 2020. "The product‐market performance benefits of environmental policy: Why customer awareness and firm innovativeness matter," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 2001-2018, July.
    3. Yoon-Na Cho, 2015. "Different Shades of Green Consciousness: The Interplay of Sustainability Labeling and Environmental Impact on Product Evaluations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 73-82, April.
    4. André Hellmeister & Harold Richins, 2019. "Green to Gold: Beneficial Impacts of Sustainability Certification and Practice on Tour Enterprise Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Naveed Ahmad & Rana Tahir Naveed & Miklas Scholz & Muhammad Irfan & Muhammad Usman & Ilyas Ahmad, 2021. "CSR Communication through Social Media: A Litmus Test for Banking Consumers’ Loyalty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Felix, Reto & Hinsch, Chris & Rauschnabel, Philipp A. & Schlegelmilch, Bodo B., 2018. "Religiousness and environmental concern: A multilevel and multi-country analysis of the role of life satisfaction and indulgence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 304-312.
    7. Xinming Deng & Yang Xu, 2017. "Consumers’ Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives: The Mediating Role of Consumer–Company Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 515-526, May.
    8. Robert G. Magee, 2022. "Understanding worldview beliefs to allay skepticism toward CSR advertising," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(6), pages 538-555, November.
    9. Elizabeth A. Minton & Soo Jiuan Tan & Siok Kuan Tambyah & Richie L. Liu, 2022. "Drivers of Sustainability and Consumer Well-Being: An Ethically-Based Examination of Religious and Cultural Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 167-190, January.
    10. Robinson, Stefanie & Eilert, Meike, 2018. "The role of message specificity in corporate social responsibility communication," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 260-268.
    11. Xie, Chunyan & Bagozzi, Richard P. & Grønhaug, Kjell, 2019. "The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer brand advocacy: The role of moral emotions, attitudes, and individual differences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 514-530.
    12. Potdar, Balkrushna & Garry, Tony & McNeill, Lisa & Gnoth, Juergen & Pandey, Rakesh & Mansi, Mansi & Guthrie, John, 2020. "Retail employee guardianship behaviour: A phenomenological investigation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    13. Vilasanti da Luz, Victoria & Mantovani, Danielle & Nepomuceno, Marcelo Vinhal, 2020. "Matching green messages with brand positioning to improve brand evaluation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 25-40.
    14. Andrea Pérez & María del Mar García de los Salmones & Elisa Baraibar-Diez, 2020. "Effects of the Type of CSR Discourse for Utilitarian and Hedonic Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Dumitrescu, Claudia & Hughner, Renée Shaw & Shultz, Clifford J., 2018. "Examining consumers' responses to corporate social responsibility addressing childhood obesity: The mediating role of attributional judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 132-140.
    16. Jiajia Zhang & Jin Sun, 2021. "Green Talk or Green Walk: Chinese Consumer Positive Word-of-Mouth to Corporate Environmental Actions in Polluting Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    17. Dae-Young Kim & Sung-Bum Kim & Kathleen Jeehyae Kim, 2019. "Building corporate reputation, overcoming consumer skepticism, and establishing trust: choosing the right message types and social causes in the restaurant industry," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(2), pages 363-388, June.
    18. Anselmsson, Johan & Burt, Steve & Tunca, Burak, 2017. "An integrated retailer image and brand equity framework: Re-examining, extending, and restructuring retailer brand equity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 194-203.
    19. Christopher Jeffords, 2014. "Preference-directed regulation when ethical environmental policy choices are formed with limited information," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 573-606, March.
    20. Zhang, Yibin & Hafezi, Maryam & Zhao, Xuan & Shi, Victor, 2017. "Reprint of “The impact of development cost on product line design and its environmental performance”," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 126-134.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3688-:d:175637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.