IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v4y2014i1p45-67d32336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neighborhood Danger, Parental Monitoring, Harsh Parenting, and Child Aggression in Nine Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Ann T. Skinner

    (Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA)

  • Dario Bacchini

    (Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, 81100 Caserta, Italy)

  • Jennifer E. Lansford

    (Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA)

  • Jennifer W. Godwin

    (Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA)

  • Emma Sorbring

    (Department of Psychology, University West, 46186 Trollhättan, Sweden)

  • Sombat Tapanya

    (Department of Psychiatry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Liliana Maria Uribe Tirado

    (Consultorio Psicológico Popular, Universidad de San Buenaventura, Carrera 56C No. 51-90, Medellín, Colombia)

  • Arnaldo Zelli

    (Department of Education Sciences, Foro Italico University of Rome, 00135 Rome, Italy)

  • Liane Peña Alampay

    (Department of Psychology, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City 1108, Philippines)

  • Suha M. Al-Hassan

    (Queen Rania Faculty for Childhood, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13115, Jordan)

  • Anna Silvia Bombi

    (Department of Social and Devlopmental Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Marc H. Bornstein

    (Child and Family Research Program in Developmental Neuroscience, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA)

  • Lei Chang

    (Department of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong)

  • Kirby Deater-Deckard

    (Department of Psychology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Laura Di Giunta

    (Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Kenneth A. Dodge

    (Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA)

  • Patrick S. Malone

    (Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Colombia, SC 29208, USA)

  • Maria Concetta Miranda

    (Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, 81100 Caserta, Italy)

  • Paul Oburu

    (Department of Education Psychology, Maseno University, Maseno, Kenya)

  • Concetta Pastorelli

    (Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Exposure to neighborhood danger during childhood has negative effects that permeate multiple dimensions of childhood. The current study examined whether mothers’, fathers’, and children’s perceptions of neighborhood danger are related to child aggression, whether parental monitoring moderates this relation, and whether harsh parenting mediates this relation. Interviews were conducted with a sample of 1293 children (age M = 10.68, SD = 0.66; 51% girls) and their mothers ( n = 1282) and fathers ( n = 1075) in nine countries (China, Colombia, Italy, Jordan, Kenya, the Philippines, Sweden, Thailand, and the United States). Perceptions of greater neighborhood danger were associated with more child aggression in all nine countries according to mothers’ and fathers’ reports and in five of the nine countries according to children’s reports. Parental monitoring did not moderate the relation between perception of neighborhood danger and child aggression. The mediating role of harsh parenting was inconsistent across countries and reporters. Implications for further research are discussed, and include examination of more specific aspects of parental monitoring as well as more objective measures of neighborhood danger.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann T. Skinner & Dario Bacchini & Jennifer E. Lansford & Jennifer W. Godwin & Emma Sorbring & Sombat Tapanya & Liliana Maria Uribe Tirado & Arnaldo Zelli & Liane Peña Alampay & Suha M. Al-Hassan & Ann, 2014. "Neighborhood Danger, Parental Monitoring, Harsh Parenting, and Child Aggression in Nine Countries," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:45-67:d:32336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/4/1/45/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/4/1/45/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph Henrich & Steve J. Heine & Ara Norenzayan, 2010. "The Weirdest People in the World?," RatSWD Working Papers 139, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    2. Zhang, Saijun & Anderson, Steven G., 2010. "Low-income single mothers' community violence exposure and aggressive parenting practices," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 889-895, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sibilla Di Guida & Ido Erev & Davide Marchiori, 2014. "Cross Cultural Differences in Decisions from Experience: Evidence from Denmark, Israel and Taiwain," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2014-16, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Hind Dib‐slamani & Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2021. "Is theft considered less severe when the victim is a foreign company?," Post-Print hal-03340844, HAL.
    3. Shi, Yun & Cui, Xiangyu & Zhou, Xunyu, 2020. "Beta and Coskewness Pricing: Perspective from Probability Weighting," SocArXiv 5rqhv, Center for Open Science.
    4. Kyriaki Remoundou & Drichoutis Andreas & Phoebe Koundouri, 2010. "Warm glow in charitable auctions: Are the WEIRDos driving the results?," DEOS Working Papers 1028, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    5. Stephen L. Cheung & Agnieszka Tymula & Xueting Wang, 2022. "Present bias for monetary and dietary rewards," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(4), pages 1202-1233, September.
    6. Plante, Charles & Lassoued, Rim & Phillips, Peter W.B., 2017. "The Social Determinants of Cognitive Bias: The Effects of Low Capability on Decision Making in a Framing Experiment," SocArXiv u62cx, Center for Open Science.
    7. John A. List, 2024. "Optimally generate policy-based evidence before scaling," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(7999), pages 491-499, February.
    8. Nicolas Jacquemet & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2014. "What drives failure to maximize payoffs in the lab? A test of the inequality aversion hypothesis," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 18(4), pages 243-264, December.
    9. Dai, Zhixin & Zheng, Jiwei & Zizzo, Daniel John, 2024. "Theories of reasoning and focal point play with a matched non-student sample," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Jenny C Su & Chi-Yue Chiu & Wei-Fang Lin & Shigehiro Oishi, 2016. "Social Monitoring Matters for Deterring Social Deviance in Stable but Not Mobile Socio-Ecological Contexts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Joshua Conrad Jackson & Marieke van Egmond & Virginia K Choi & Carol R Ember & Jamin Halberstadt & Jovana Balanovic & Inger N Basker & Klaus Boehnke & Noemi Buki & Ronald Fischer & Marta Fulop & Ashle, 2019. "Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Holli-Anne Passmore & Ying Yang & Sarena Sabine, 2022. "An Extended Replication Study of the Well-Being Intervention, the Noticing Nature Intervention (NNI)," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 2663-2683, August.
    13. Chen, Daniel L. & Schonger, Martin & Wickens, Chris, 2016. "oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 88-97.
    14. Pamela Jakiela & Edward Miguel & Vera Velde, 2015. "You’ve earned it: estimating the impact of human capital on social preferences," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(3), pages 385-407, September.
    15. Barmettler, Franziska & Fehr, Ernst & Zehnder, Christian, 2012. "Big experimenter is watching you! Anonymity and prosocial behavior in the laboratory," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 17-34.
    16. Nadav Klein & Igor Grossmann & Ayse K. Uskul & Alexandra A. Kraus & Nicholas Epley, 2015. "It pays to be nice, but not really nice: Asymmetric reputations from prosociality across 7 countries," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 10(4), pages 355-364, July.
    17. Epton, Tracy & Ghio, Daniela & Ballard, Lisa M. & Allen, Sarah F. & Kassianos, Angelos P. & Hewitt, Rachael & Swainston, Katherine & Fynn, Wendy Irene & Rowland, Vickie & Westbrook, Juliette & Jenkins, 2022. "Interventions to promote physical distancing behaviour during infectious disease pandemics or epidemics: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    18. Theodore T. Bartholomew, 2016. "Mental Health in Namibia," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 28(1), pages 101-125, March.
    19. Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2015. "Social preferences in the online laboratory: a randomized experiment," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(2), pages 251-283, June.
    20. Peter Martinsson & Emil Persson, 2019. "Public Goods and Minimum Provision Levels: Does the Institutional Formation Affect Cooperation?," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 121(4), pages 1473-1499, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:45-67:d:32336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.