IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v11y2023i5p90-d1144622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Compound Up-and-In Call like Option for Wind Projects Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Bufalo

    (Department of Methods and Models for Economics, Territory and Finance, Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”, Via del Castro Laurenziano 9, 00185 Roma, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Antonio Di Bari

    (Department of Economics and Finance, University of Bari, Largo Abbazia S. Scolastica, 53, 70124 Bari, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Giovanni Villani

    (Department of Economics and Finance, University of Bari, Largo Abbazia S. Scolastica, 53, 70124 Bari, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Wind energy projects represent, currently, a valid opportunity to support United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 7. However, these projects can appear financially unattractive considering the unfavorable meteorological conditions, uncertain electricity market price, uncertain market demand, unpredictable project performance, riskiness of investment stages, etc. This paper provides a real options pricing model applied for the evaluation of a wind farm project to include the uncertainty that can affect future performance. The methodology proposed uses a compound call option model with two barriers applied, respectively, to the twofold phase framework that would act as a sort of up-and-in barrier. The compound call option model allows us to valuate the managerial flexibility to proceed with the following investment stages depending on the success of the previous ones and, through the barriers, the methodology gives the investor the opportunity to consider some profitability thresholds below, past which the investment should be abandoned. We develop a discrete case methodology by using the binomial approach. A hypothetical case study is shown to implement the theoretical framework by using likely data.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Bufalo & Antonio Di Bari & Giovanni Villani, 2023. "A Compound Up-and-In Call like Option for Wind Projects Pricing," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:5:p:90-:d:1144622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/5/90/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/5/90/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bell Fanon Ouelega, 2013. "State-Price Deflators and Risk-Neutral valuation of Life Insurance Liabilities," AAYE Policy Research Working Paper Series 11, Association of African Young Economists, revised Nov 2013.
    2. Yeny E. Rodríguez & Miguel A. Pérez-Uribe & Javier Contreras, 2021. "Wind Put Barrier Options Pricing Based on the Nordix Index," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Venetsanos, Konstantinos & Angelopoulou, Penelope & Tsoutsos, Theocharis, 2002. "Renewable energy sources project appraisal under uncertainty: the case of wind energy exploitation within a changing energy market environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 293-307, March.
    4. Lee, Shun-Chung, 2011. "Using real option analysis for highly uncertain technology investments: The case of wind energy technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4443-4450.
    5. Jouini, Elyes & Napp, Clotilde & Schachermayer, Walter, 2005. "Arbitrage and state price deflators in a general intertemporal framework," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 722-734, September.
    6. Antonio Di Bari, 2021. "A barrier real option approach to evaluate public–private partnership projects and prevent moral hazard," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Bell Fanon Ouelega, 2013. "State-Price Deflators and Risk-Neutral valuation of Life Insurance Liabilities," AAYE Policy Research Working Paper Series 13_011, Association of African Young Economists, revised Nov 2013.
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/345 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Michele Bufalo & Antonio Di Bari & Giovanni Villani, 2022. "Multi-stage real option evaluation with double barrier under stochastic volatility and interest rate," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 247-266, June.
    10. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 637-654, May-June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Penizzotto, F. & Pringles, R. & Olsina, F., 2019. "Real options valuation of photovoltaic power investments in existing buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Felipe Isaza Cuervo & Sergio Botero Boterob, 2014. "Aplicación de las opciones reales en la toma de decisiones en los mercados de electricidad," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, November.
    3. Sim, Jaehun & Kim, Chae-Soo, 2019. "The value of renewable energy research and development investments with default consideration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 530-539.
    4. Kozlova, Mariia, 2017. "Real option valuation in renewable energy literature: Research focus, trends and design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 180-196.
    5. Yanbin Li & Min Wu & Zhen Li, 2018. "A Real Options Analysis for Renewable Energy Investment Decisions under China Carbon Trading Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-10, July.
    6. Cuervo, Felipe Isaza & Botero, Sergio Botero, 2016. "Wind power reliability valuation in a Hydro-Dominated power market: The Colombian case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1359-1372.
    7. Jeon, Chanwoong & Lee, Jeongjin & Shin, Juneseuk, 2015. "Optimal subsidy estimation method using system dynamics and the real option model: Photovoltaic technology case," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 33-43.
    8. Santos, Lúcia & Soares, Isabel & Mendes, Carla & Ferreira, Paula, 2014. "Real Options versus Traditional Methods to assess Renewable Energy Projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 588-594.
    9. Lee, Shun-Chung, 2011. "Using real option analysis for highly uncertain technology investments: The case of wind energy technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4443-4450.
    10. Kroniger, Daniel & Madlener, Reinhard, 2014. "Hydrogen storage for wind parks: A real options evaluation for an optimal investment in more flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 931-946.
    11. Balibrea-Iniesta, José & Rodríguez-Monroy, Carlos & Núñez-Guerrero, Yilsy María, 2021. "Economic analysis of the German regulation for electrical generation projects from biogas applying the theory of real options," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    12. Lee, Shun-Chung & Shih, Li-Hsing, 2010. "Renewable energy policy evaluation using real option model -- The case of Taiwan," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(Supplemen), pages 67-78, September.
    13. José Balibrea-Iniesta, 2020. "Economic Analysis of Renewable Energy Regulation in France: A Case Study for Photovoltaic Plants Based on Real Options," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Lima, Dmitry & Colson, Gregory & Karali, Berna & Guerrero, Bridget & Amosson, Stephen & Wetzstein, Michael, 2013. "A New Look at the Economic Evaluation of Wind Energy as an Alternative to Electric and Natural Gas-Powered Irrigation," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 739-751, November.
    15. Carmen Schiel & Simon Glöser-Chahoud & Frank Schultmann, 2019. "A real option application for emission control measures," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 291-325, April.
    16. MacDougall, Shelley L., 2015. "The value of delay in tidal energy development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 438-446.
    17. Kim, Kyeongseok & Kim, Byungil & Kim, Hyoungkwan, 2018. "A decision-making model for the analysis of offshore wind farm projects under climate uncertainties: A case study of South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 853-860.
    18. Christina E. Bannier, 2016. "Bewertungsmethoden in der Projektfinanzierung Erneuerbarer Energien [Valuation Methods for Renewable Energy Projects]," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 75-110, April.
    19. Yiqing Li & Weiguo Yang & Lixin Tian & Jie Yang, 2018. "An Evaluation of Investment in a PV Power Generation Project in the Gobi Desert Using a Real Options Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    20. McInerney, Celine & Bunn, Derek W., 2017. "Optimal over installation of wind generation facilities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 87-96.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:5:p:90-:d:1144622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.