IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i18p3304-d912806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Fuzzy Portfolio Selection Concerning Multi-Objective Risk Attitudes in Group Decision

Author

Listed:
  • Yin-Yin Huang

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanchang Vocational University, 308 Provincial Road, Anyi County, Nanchang 330500, China)

  • Ruey-Chyn Tsaur

    (Department of Management Sciences, Tamkang University, No. 151, Yingzhuan Road, Tamsui District, New Taipei City 25137, Taiwan)

  • Nei-Chin Huang

    (Department of Management Sciences, Tamkang University, No. 151, Yingzhuan Road, Tamsui District, New Taipei City 25137, Taiwan)

Abstract

Fuzzy portfolio selection has resulted in many researchers to focus on this field. Based on the risk attitudes, this study discusses the risk attitudes in a decision group for portfolio selection. Therefore, we adopt the risk attitudes to describe the experts’ risk preferences and subjective judgments, and then we suppose that the risk seeker considers a higher return for an excess investment based on the selected guaranteed rate of return; the risk averter considers a shortage in investment for the securities whose return rates are smaller than the selected guaranteed rate of return; and finally, the risk neutral pursues the regular return rate. In order to solve the multi-objective return rate functions under the corresponding investment risks, the SMART-ROC weighting method is used to hybridize the multi-objective programming model to a linear programming model for solving the portfolio selection. Finally, we illustrate a numerical example and two risk scenarios to show the optimal portfolio selection under different investment risks. The results show that the proposed model can obtain a more robust portfolio than the compared models under different risk priorities in a decision group.

Suggested Citation

  • Yin-Yin Huang & Ruey-Chyn Tsaur & Nei-Chin Huang, 2022. "Sustainable Fuzzy Portfolio Selection Concerning Multi-Objective Risk Attitudes in Group Decision," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:18:p:3304-:d:912806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/18/3304/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/18/3304/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael J. Best & Jaroslava Hlouskova, 2000. "The efficient frontier for bounded assets," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 52(2), pages 195-212, November.
    2. Jong-Shi Pang, 1980. "A New and Efficient Algorithm for a Class of Portfolio Selection Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3-part-ii), pages 754-767, June.
    3. Kuen-Suan Chen & Tsun-Hung Huang, 2021. "A Fuzzy Evaluation Model Aimed at Smaller-the-Better-Type Quality Characteristics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-13, October.
    4. Best, Michael J. & Grauer, Robert R., 1990. "The efficient set mathematics when mean-variance problems are subject to general linear constraints," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 105-120, May.
    5. Fernando García & Jairo González-Bueno & Javier Oliver & Nicola Riley, 2019. "Selecting Socially Responsible Portfolios: A Fuzzy Multicriteria Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Ruey-Chyn Tsaur, 2015. "Fuzzy portfolio model with fuzzy-input return rates and fuzzy-output proportions," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 438-450, February.
    7. Edwards, Ward & Barron, F. Hutton, 1994. "SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 306-325, December.
    8. Yin-Yin Huang & Liwei Li & Ruey-Chyn Tsaur, 2022. "Smartphone Market Analysis with Respect to Brand Performance Using Hybrid Multicriteria Decision Making Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Merton, Robert C., 1972. "An Analytic Derivation of the Efficient Portfolio Frontier," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(4), pages 1851-1872, September.
    10. Tsaur, Ruey-Chyn, 2013. "Fuzzy portfolio model with different investor risk attitudes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 385-390.
    11. Sergey Evgenievich Barykin & Elena Aleksandrovna Smirnova & Dan Chzhao & Irina Vasilievna Kapustina & Sergey Mikhailovich Sergeev & Yuri Yurievich Mikhalchevsky & Alexander Viktorovich Gubenko & Genna, 2021. "Digital Echelons and Interfaces within Value Chains: End-to-End Marketing and Logistics Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Yin-Yin Huang & I-Fei Chen & Chien-Liang Chiu & Ruey-Chyn Tsaur, 2021. "Adjustable Security Proportions in the Fuzzy Portfolio Selection under Guaranteed Return Rates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Ke, Yiming & Li, Xinying & Li, Lingwenying, 2019. "Portfolio selection of distributed energy generation projects considering uncertainty and project interaction under different enterprise strategic scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 444-464.
    14. Guo, Sini & Yu, Lean & Li, Xiang & Kar, Samarjit, 2016. "Fuzzy multi-period portfolio selection with different investment horizons," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 1026-1035.
    15. Kuen-Suan Chen, 2022. "Fuzzy testing of operating performance index based on confidence intervals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 19-33, April.
    16. Hashemizadeh, Ali & Ju, Yanbing & Bamakan, Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini & Le, Hoang Phong, 2021. "Renewable energy investment risk assessment in belt and road initiative countries under uncertainty conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    17. Ozcan, Burcu & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2019. "Renewable energy consumption-economic growth nexus in emerging countries: A bootstrap panel causality test," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 30-37.
    18. Chang, Ching-Ter, 2015. "Multi-choice goal programming model for the optimal location of renewable energy facilities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 379-389.
    19. Ruey-Chyn Tsaur & Chien-Liang Chiu & Yin-Yin Huang, 2021. "Fuzzy Portfolio Selection in COVID-19 Spreading Period Using Fuzzy Goal Programming Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Cayir Ervural, Beyzanur & Evren, Ramazan & Delen, Dursun, 2018. "A multi-objective decision-making approach for sustainable energy investment planning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 387-402.
    21. Chun-Min Yu & Tsun-Hung Huang & Kuen-Suan Chen & Tsung-Yu Huang, 2022. "Construct Six Sigma DMAIC Improvement Model for Manufacturing Process Quality of Multi-Characteristic Products," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kuen-Suan Chen & Ruey-Chyn Tsaur & Nei-Chih Lin, 2022. "Dimensions Analysis to Excess Investment in Fuzzy Portfolio Model from the Threshold of Guaranteed Return Rates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuen-Suan Chen & Ruey-Chyn Tsaur & Nei-Chih Lin, 2022. "Dimensions Analysis to Excess Investment in Fuzzy Portfolio Model from the Threshold of Guaranteed Return Rates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Kuen-Suan Chen & Yin-Yin Huang & Ruey-Chyn Tsaur & Nei-Yu Lin, 2023. "Fuzzy Portfolio Selection in the Risk Attitudes of Dimension Analysis under the Adjustable Security Proportions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Ruey-Chyn Tsaur, 2015. "Fuzzy portfolio model with fuzzy-input return rates and fuzzy-output proportions," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 438-450, February.
    4. Tsaur, Ruey-Chyn, 2013. "Fuzzy portfolio model with different investor risk attitudes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 385-390.
    5. Ruey-Chyn Tsaur & Chien-Liang Chiu & Yin-Yin Huang, 2021. "Fuzzy Portfolio Selection in COVID-19 Spreading Period Using Fuzzy Goal Programming Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Zhang, Wei-Guo & Wang, Ying-Luo, 2008. "An analytic derivation of admissible efficient frontier with borrowing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 229-243, January.
    7. Chen, Wei & Zhang, Wei-Guo, 2010. "The admissible portfolio selection problem with transaction costs and an improved PSO algorithm," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(10), pages 2070-2076.
    8. Thomas J. Brennan & Andrew W. Lo, 2010. "Impossible Frontiers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 905-923, June.
    9. Zhang, Wei-Guo & Zhang, Xi-Li & Xiao, Wei-Lin, 2009. "Portfolio selection under possibilistic mean-variance utility and a SMO algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 693-700, September.
    10. Michael Best & Xili Zhang, 2012. "The Efficient Frontier for Weakly Correlated Assets," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 40(4), pages 355-375, December.
    11. Wei Chen & Yun Wang & Mukesh Kumar Mehlawat, 2018. "A hybrid FA–SA algorithm for fuzzy portfolio selection with transaction costs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 129-147, October.
    12. Riccardo Lucchetti & Mihaela Nicolau & Giulio Palomba & Luca Riccetti, 2022. "Reconciling TEV and VaR in Active Portfolio Management: A New Frontier," Working Papers 461, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    13. Akbari, Negar & Jones, Dylan & Arabikhan, Farzad, 2021. "Goal programming models with interval coefficients for the sustainable selection of marine renewable energy projects in the UK," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 748-760.
    14. Kuen-Suan Chen & Feng-Chia Li & Kuei-Kuei Lai & Jung-Mao Lin, 2022. "Green Outsourcer Selection Model Based on Confidence Interval of PCI for SMT Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Marco Corazza & Carla Nardelli, 2019. "Possibilistic mean–variance portfolios versus probabilistic ones: the winner is..," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 42(1), pages 51-75, June.
    16. Li, Ting & Zhang, Weiguo & Xu, Weijun, 2015. "A fuzzy portfolio selection model with background risk," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 505-513.
    17. Z. Landsman & U. Makov & T. Shushi, 2020. "Portfolio Optimization by a Bivariate Functional of the Mean and Variance," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 185(2), pages 622-651, May.
    18. Hashemizadeh, Ali & Bui, Quocviet & Zaidi, Syed Anees Haider, 2022. "A blend of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption in G-7 countries: The role of disaggregate energy in human development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    19. Zhang, Zhiying & Liao, Huchang & Tang, Anbin, 2022. "Renewable energy portfolio optimization with public participation under uncertainty: A hybrid multi-attribute multi-objective decision-making method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    20. Zhang, Wei-Guo & Zhang, Xi-Li & Xu, Wei-Jun, 2010. "A risk tolerance model for portfolio adjusting problem with transaction costs based on possibilistic moments," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 493-499, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:18:p:3304-:d:912806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.