IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v7y2018i2p51-d141465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Politics under Market Socialism: The State, Land Policies, and Rural–Urban Land Conversion in China and Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Hoang Linh Nguyen

    (Department of Urban Planning, School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Jin Duan

    (Department of Urban Planning, School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Guo Qin Zhang

    (Department of Architecture, Shanghai academy of fine arts, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

Abstract

This paper undertakes a comparative analysis of rural–urban land conversion policies in China and Vietnam, and examines the ideology of the state in land policymaking under a market socialism environment. It argues that land policies in both countries include ambiguous boundaries, which allow the socialist state to legitimize its politico-administrative power in land management and retain strong intervention capacity in the land market. In addition to similarities, land policies in China and Vietnam show significant differences in terms of the ownership of rural land and related legislation on land expropriation and transactions. Together, these distinctions cause divergent impacts on the interests and motivations of multiple stakeholders in rural land conversion. It is further observed that the state in both countries is characterized by dynamic, complex, and self-coordinated institutional systems, in which multiple levels of government have different driving forces and strategies in land development. The internal structure of authority in rural–urban land conversion between the multiple levels of government is readjusted by the regulatory land control of the central government.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoang Linh Nguyen & Jin Duan & Guo Qin Zhang, 2018. "Land Politics under Market Socialism: The State, Land Policies, and Rural–Urban Land Conversion in China and Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:51-:d:141465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/2/51/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/2/51/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fulong Wu, 2003. "The (Post-) Socialist Entrepreneurial City as a State Project: Shanghai's Reglobalisation in Question," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(9), pages 1673-1698, August.
    2. Quy-Toan Do & Lakshmi Iyer, 2003. "Land rights and economic development : evidence from Vietnam," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3120, The World Bank.
    3. Jiang Xu & Anthony Yeh, 2009. "Decoding Urban Land Governance: State Reconstruction in Contemporary Chinese Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(3), pages 559-581, March.
    4. Jieming Zhu, 1999. "Local Growth Coalition: The Context and Implications of China’s Gradualist Urban Land Reforms," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 534-548, September.
    5. Annette M. Kim, 2011. "Talking Back: The Role of Narrative in Vietnam’s Recent Land Compensation Changes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(3), pages 493-508, February.
    6. Kaifang Shi & Yun Chen & Bailang Yu & Tingbao Xu & Linyi Li & Chang Huang & Rui Liu & Zuoqi Chen & Jianping Wu, 2016. "Urban Expansion and Agricultural Land Loss in China: A Multiscale Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Ho, Peter, 2005. "Institutions in Transition: Land Ownership, Property Rights, and Social Conflict in China," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199280698.
    8. Ran Tao & Zhigang Xu, 2006. "Groping for Stones to Cross the River versus Coordinated Policy Reforms: The Case of Two Reforms in China," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 177-201.
    9. Lichtenberg, Erik & Ding, Chengri, 2009. "Local officials as land developers: Urban spatial expansion in China," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 57-64, July.
    10. Jiang Xu & Anthony Yeh & Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Commodification: New Land Development and Politics in China since the Late 1990s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 890-913, December.
    11. Sun Sheng Han & Kim Trang Vu, 2008. "Land Acquisition in Transitional Hanoi, Vietnam," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1097-1117, May.
    12. Jieming Zhu, 2002. "Urban Development under Ambiguous Property Rights: A Case of China’s Transition Economy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 41-57, March.
    13. Shenjing He & Yuting Liu & Chris Webster & Fulong Wu, 2009. "Property Rights Redistribution, Entitlement Failure and the Impoverishment of Landless Farmers in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(9), pages 1925-1949, August.
    14. Danielle Labbé & Clement Musil, 2014. "Periurban Land Redevelopment in Vietnam under Market Socialism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(6), pages 1146-1161, May.
    15. Yongchun Yang & Deli Zhang & Qingmin Meng & Corrin McCarn, 2015. "Urban Residential Land Use Reconstruction under Dual-Track Mechanism of Market Socialism in China: A Case Study of Chengdu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mai T.T. Duong & D. Ary A. Samsura & Erwin van der Krabben, 2020. "Land Conversion for Tourism Development under Vietnam’s Ambiguous Property Rights over Land," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Kairong Hong & Yucheng Zou & Yanwei Zhang & Kaifeng Duan, 2020. "The Weapon of the Weak: An Analysis of RDEU Game in the Conflict of Farmland Expropriation under the Influence of Emotion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Hoang Linh Nguyen & Jin Duan & Jin Hua Liu, 2018. "State Control Versus Hybrid Land Markets: Planning and Urban Development in Transitional Hanoi, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Mai, The Vinh & Casady, Carter B., 2023. "Delivering transport infrastructure using state-owned enterprises (SOEs): A business history of Vietnam Expressway Corporation between 2004 and 2016," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 339-350.
    5. Mengling Tian & Yangyang Zheng, 2022. "How to Promote the Withdrawal of Rural Land Contract Rights? An Evolutionary Game Analysis Based on Prospect Theory," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.
    6. Lingling Li & Yansong He & Changjian Li, 2022. "How Can the Risk of Misconduct in Land Expropriation for Tract Development Be Prevented and Mitigated: A Study of “Good Land Governance” Inspection in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Lianma Zhang & Dazhuan Ge & Pan Sun & Dongqi Sun, 2021. "The Transition Mechanism and Revitalization Path of Rural Industrial Land from a Spatial Governance Perspective: The Case of Shunde District, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Mario A. González‐Corzo, 2020. "Agrarian Policy Changes and the Evolution of Land Tenure in Cuba," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 39(3), pages 239-258, September.
    9. Gyourko, Joseph & Shen, Yang & Wu, Jing & Zhang, Rongjie, 2022. "Land finance in China: Analysis and review," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Zhongqiong Qu & Yongxin Wei & Xun Li, 2021. "Risk Perception of Rural Land Supply Reform in China: From the Perspective of Stakeholders," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, July.
    11. József Lennert & Jenő Zsolt Farkas & András Donát Kovács & András Molnár & Rita Módos & Dorián Baka & Zoltán Kovács, 2020. "Measuring and Predicting Long-Term Land Cover Changes in the Functional Urban Area of Budapest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Ronghao & Lin, George C.S., 2021. "Placing China’s land marketization: The state, market, and the changing geography of land use in Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Lanchih Po, 2011. "Property Rights Reforms and Changing Grassroots Governance in China’s Urban—Rural Peripheries: The Case of Changping District in Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(3), pages 509-528, February.
    3. Li, Wanxin, 2016. "Failure by design – National mandates and agent control of local land use in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 518-526.
    4. Yiming Wang & Jie Chen, 2021. "Privatizing the Urban Commons Under Ambiguous Property Rights in China: Is Marketization a Remedy to the Tragedy of the Commons?," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 503-547, March.
    5. Yongchun Yang & Deli Zhang & Qingmin Meng & Corrin McCarn, 2015. "Urban Residential Land Use Reconstruction under Dual-Track Mechanism of Market Socialism in China: A Case Study of Chengdu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Wang, Yuan & Hui, Eddie Chi-man, 2017. "Are local governments maximizing land revenue? Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 196-215.
    7. Jiang Xu & Anthony Yeh & Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Commodification: New Land Development and Politics in China since the Late 1990s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 890-913, December.
    8. Ran Liu & Tai-Chee Wong & Shenghe Liu, 2012. "Peasants' Counterplots against the State Monopoly of the Rural Urbanization Process: Urban Villages and ‘Small Property Housing’ in Beijing, China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(5), pages 1219-1240, May.
    9. Xu Guangdong, 2013. "Property Rights, Law, and Economic Development," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 117-142, July.
    10. Bin Li & Chaoqun Liu, 2018. "Emerging selective regimes in a fragmented authoritarian environment: The ‘three old redevelopment’ policy in Guangzhou, China from 2009 to 2014," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1400-1419, May.
    11. Federico Caprotti & Cecilia Springer & Nichola Harmer, 2015. "‘Eco’ For Whom? Envisioning Eco-urbanism in the Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city, China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 495-517, May.
    12. Fox ZY Hu, 2015. "Industrial capitalisation and spatial transformation in Chinese cities: Strategic repositioning, state-owned enterprise capitalisation, and the reproduction of urban space in Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(15), pages 2799-2821, November.
    13. Cheng, Jing, 2020. "Analyzing the factors influencing the choice of the government on leasing different types of land uses: Evidence from Shanghai of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. Liu, Zekun & Jiang, Caixin & Huang, Jun & Zhang, Weiwen & Li, Xuewen, 2023. "Fiscal incentive, political incentive, and strategic interaction of illegal land use by local governments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    15. Xing Su & Zhu Qian, 2020. "State Intervention in Land Supply and Its Impact on Real Estate Investment in China: Evidence from Prefecture-Level Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Liu, Shouying & Ma, Sen & Yin, Lijuan & Zhu, Jiong, 2023. "Land titling, human capital misallocation, and agricultural productivity in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    17. Edoardo Bruno, 2022. "Socio-Spatial ‘Tabula Rasa’ and Punctual Preservation: The Case Study of Measurable Compensation in Lijiao Village," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-27, July.
    18. Lihe Tu & Emanuele Padovani, 2018. "A Research on the Debt Sustainability of China’s Major City Governments in Post-Land Finance Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Chunhui Liu & Weixuan Song & Chen Zhou, 2017. "Unsuccessful Urban Governance of Brownfield Land Redevelopment: A Lesson from the Toxic Soil Event in Changzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    20. Jiang Xu & Anthony Yeh, 2009. "Decoding Urban Land Governance: State Reconstruction in Contemporary Chinese Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(3), pages 559-581, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:51-:d:141465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.