IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1466-d905106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization Methods as a Base for Decision Making in Land Consolidation Projects Ranking

Author

Listed:
  • Goran Marinković

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Zoran Ilić

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Milan Trifković

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering Subotica, University of Novi Sad, 24000 Subotica, Serbia)

  • Jelena Tatalović

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering Subotica, University of Novi Sad, 24000 Subotica, Serbia)

  • Marko Božić

    (Meixner d.o.o., Hermanova 16/G, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Land consolidation (LC) is an activity that brings numerous benefits to rural areas. However, being resource demanding, the LC requires a decision on where it should be provided or where the limited resources should be distributed in order to maximize its effects. In order to avoid the subjective decision maker’s preferences, optimization methods for identifying the priorities are recommended. Bearing in mind that every optimization method could give different results, we proposed the utilization of multiple optimization methods for ranking the cadastral municipalities which are candidates for providing LC. In this research, the main aim was to find if it is possible to avoid the subjective decision making in cadastral municipalities (CM) as a candidate for LC ranking by utilizing the statistical approach. Additionally, in this research, the analysis was provided, varying the number of optimization criteria. In this research, two assumptions were adopted: (1) every single optimization method has the same weight, and (2) the differences between different ranks are results of random errors. After determining the average ranking of a certain cadastral municipality, its interval of ranking is calculated by using the Student’s distribution. Cadastral municipalities that belong within the interval of available resources are candidates for providing LC. In the case study, fifteen cadastral municipalities were researched, including eight and ten criteria for optimization, and results showed that there are significant differences between ranks of cadastral municipalities varying depending on the method utilized.

Suggested Citation

  • Goran Marinković & Zoran Ilić & Milan Trifković & Jelena Tatalović & Marko Božić, 2022. "Optimization Methods as a Base for Decision Making in Land Consolidation Projects Ranking," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1466-:d:905106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1466/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1466/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying Liu & Liqiong Shu & Li Peng, 2021. "The Hollowing Process of Rural Communities in China: Considering the Regional Characteristic," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Wójcik-Leń, Justyna & Leń, Przemysław & Mika, Monika & Kryszk, Hubert & Kotlarz, Paweł, 2019. "Studies regarding correct selection of statistical methods for the needs of increasing the efficiency of identification of land for consolidation—A case study in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Yin, Qiqi & Sui, Xueyan & Ye, Bei & Zhou, Yujie & Li, Chengqiang & Zou, Mengmeng & Zhou, Shenglu, 2022. "What role does land consolidation play in the multi-dimensional rural revitalization in China? A research synthesis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    5. Sheng-Hau Lin & Kung-Ming Liu & Jing-Chzi Hsieh & Chiao-Lun Hu & Xianjin Huang & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2020. "A new hybrid modified MADM model for the potential evaluation of a comprehensive land consolidation project (LCP) toward achieving sustainable development," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(9), pages 1585-1615, July.
    6. Pašakarnis, Giedrius & Maliene, Vida & Dixon-Gough, Robert & Malys, Naglis, 2021. "Decision support framework to rank and prioritise the potential land areas for comprehensive land consolidation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    7. Joaquín Pérez & José Jimeno & Ethel Mokotoff, 2006. "Another potential shortcoming of AHP," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 14(1), pages 99-111, June.
    8. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2012. "Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 2, number 978-1-4614-3597-6, September.
    9. Janus, Jarosław & Ertunç, Ela, 2021. "Differences in the effectiveness of land consolidation projects in various countries and their causes: Examples of Poland and Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Zlatica Muchová & František Petrovič, 2019. "Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects—Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Przemysław Leń & Klaudia Maciąg & Michał Maciąg & Justyna Wójcik-Leń & Katarzyna Kocur-Bera, 2023. "Automated Processing of Data in the Comparative Estimation of Land Value during Land Consolidation Works," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Oliveira, Gilson Adamczuk & Tan, Kim Hua & Guedes, Bruno Turmina, 2018. "Lean and green approach: An evaluation tool for new product development focused on small and medium enterprises," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 62-73.
    4. Wojewodzic, Tomasz & Janus, Jaroslaw & Dacko, Mariusz & Pijanowski, Jacek & Taszakowski, Jaroslaw, 2021. "Measuring the effectiveness of land consolidation: An economic approach based on selected case studies from Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    5. Janus, Jarosław & Ertunç, Ela, 2022. "Towards a full automation of land consolidation projects: Fast land partitioning algorithm using the land value map," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    7. Li, Hanbing & Jin, Xiaobin & McCormick, Barbara Prack & Tittonell, Pablo & Liu, Jing & Han, Bo & Sun, Rui & Zhou, Yinkang, 2023. "Analysis of the contribution of land consolidation to sustainable poverty alleviation under various natural conditions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Dongli Zhang & Lihong Yu & Wenxiong Wang, 2022. "Promoting Effect of Whole-Region Comprehensive Land Consolidation on Rural Revitalization from the Perspective of Farm Households: A China Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Engin ÇAKIR, 2017. "Application of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods on Six Sigma Projects Selection," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, KSP Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 132-138, March.
    10. Amir Hossein Salimi & Amir Noori & Hossein Bonakdari & Jafar Masoompour Samakosh & Ehsan Sharifi & Mohammadreza Hassanvand & Baharam Gharabaghi & Mehdi Agharazi, 2020. "Exploring the Role of Advertising Types on Improving the Water Consumption Behavior: An Application of Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-33, February.
    11. Jana Stofkova & Matej Krejnus & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Peter Malega & Vladimira Binasova, 2022. "Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Selected Methods in the Managerial Decision-Making Process in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Namik Erdogan & Serpil Altinirmak & Caglar Karamasa, 2016. "Performance Assessment of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REIT) Listed in BIST Via Different Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(7), pages 304-304, July.
    13. Jichang Cui & Yanbo Qu & Yan Li & Lingyun Zhan & Guancheng Guo & Xiaozhen Dong, 2022. "Reconstruction of Rural Settlement Patterns in China: The Role of Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Jian Zhou & Chao Li & Xiaotong Chu & Chenying Luo, 2022. "Is Cultivated Land Increased by Land Consolidation Sustainably Used in Mountainous Areas?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Yaoben Lin & Danling Chen, 2022. "Functional Zoning and Path Selection of Land Comprehensive Consolidation Based on Grey Constellation Clustering: A Case Study of Dongying City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-16, May.
    16. Wei Xia & Gangqiao Yang, 2022. "Decision-Making Evaluation of the Pilot Project of Comprehensive Land Consolidation from the Perspective of Farmers and Social Investors: A Case Study of the Project Applied in Xianning City, Hubei Pr," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Yongming Song & Jun Hu, 2017. "Vector similarity measures of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their applications," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Yi Peng, 2015. "Regional earthquake vulnerability assessment using a combination of MCDM methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 234(1), pages 95-110, November.
    19. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    20. Martina Artmann, 2013. "Response-Efficiency-Assessment: A Conceptual Framework For Rating Policy'S Efficiency To Meet Sustainable Development On The Example Of Soil Sealing Management," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(04), pages 1-33.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1466-:d:905106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.