IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v63y2020i9p1585-1615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new hybrid modified MADM model for the potential evaluation of a comprehensive land consolidation project (LCP) toward achieving sustainable development

Author

Listed:
  • Sheng-Hau Lin
  • Kung-Ming Liu
  • Jing-Chzi Hsieh
  • Chiao-Lun Hu
  • Xianjin Huang
  • Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng

Abstract

The potential evaluations of land consolidation projects (LCPs) are core in ex-ante evaluations to ensure that resource allocations are effective for achieving sustainable development. There are some problems with the unrealistic assumptions of the real world in these evaluations, such as the assumed independence of the criteria/dimensions in real-world problems. In this research, to fill this performance gap, a new hybrid modified MADM model was developed to construct an evaluation framework for comprehensive LCPs, covering three dimensions and ten criteria. Two LCPs real cases were used as empirical cases. The results of the DEMATEL method indicate that to achieve sustainable rural development through LCPs, “Production dimension (D1)” and “Ecological dimensions (D3)” having the characteristics that affect others should be the focus, although the DANP suggests that the “Life dimension (D2)” has the highest influence weight. The modified VIKOR suggests that Case A has more potential than Case B.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheng-Hau Lin & Kung-Ming Liu & Jing-Chzi Hsieh & Chiao-Lun Hu & Xianjin Huang & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2020. "A new hybrid modified MADM model for the potential evaluation of a comprehensive land consolidation project (LCP) toward achieving sustainable development," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(9), pages 1585-1615, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:63:y:2020:i:9:p:1585-1615
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2019.1673152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2019.1673152
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2019.1673152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Janus, Jarosław & Ertunç, Ela, 2022. "Towards a full automation of land consolidation projects: Fast land partitioning algorithm using the land value map," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Goran Marinković & Zoran Ilić & Milan Trifković & Jelena Tatalović & Marko Božić, 2022. "Optimization Methods as a Base for Decision Making in Land Consolidation Projects Ranking," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Jichang Cui & Yanbo Qu & Yan Li & Lingyun Zhan & Guancheng Guo & Xiaozhen Dong, 2022. "Reconstruction of Rural Settlement Patterns in China: The Role of Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Schulze-González, Erik & Pastor-Ferrando, Juan-Pascual & Aragonés-Beltrán, Pablo, 2023. "Clustering and reference value for assessing influence in analytic network process without pairwise comparison matrices: Study of 17 real cases," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 10(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:63:y:2020:i:9:p:1585-1615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.