IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i3p399-d766998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Importance of Scale and the MAUP for Robust Ecosystem Service Evaluations and Landscape Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Alexis Comber

    (School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Paul Harris

    (Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton EX20 2SB, UK)

Abstract

Spatial data are used in many scientific domains including analyses of Ecosystem Services (ES) and Natural Capital (NC), with results used to inform planning and policy. However, the data spatial scale (or support) has a fundamental impact on analysis outputs and, thus, process understanding and inference. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) describes the effects of scale on analyses of spatial data and outputs, but it has been ignored in much environmental research, including evaluations of land use with respect to ES and NC. This paper illustrates the MAUP through an ES optimisation problem. The results show that MAUP effects are unpredictable and nonlinear, with discontinuities specific to the spatial properties of the case study. Four key recommendations are as follows: (1) The MAUP should always be tested for in ES evaluations. This is commonly performed in socio-economic analyses. (2) Spatial aggregation scales should be matched to process granularity by identifying the aggregation scale at which processes are considered to be stable (stationary) with respect to variances, covariances, and other moments. (3) Aggregation scales should be evaluated along with the scale of decision making (e.g., agricultural field, farm holding, and catchment). (4) Researchers in ES and related disciplines should up-skill themselves in spatial analysis and core paradigms related to scale to overcome the scale blindness commonly found in much research.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexis Comber & Paul Harris, 2022. "The Importance of Scale and the MAUP for Robust Ecosystem Service Evaluations and Landscape Decisions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:399-:d:766998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/3/399/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/3/399/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kelvyn Jones & David Manley & Ron Johnston & Dewi Owen, 2018. "Modelling residential segregation as unevenness and clustering: A multilevel modelling approach incorporating spatial dependence and tackling the MAUP," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(6), pages 1122-1141, November.
    2. Daisuke Murakami & Morito Tsutsumi, 2015. "Area-to-point parameter estimation with geographically weighted regression," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 207-225, July.
    3. Comber, Alexis & Dickie, Jennifer & Jarvis, Claire & Phillips, Martin & Tansey, Kevin, 2015. "Locating bioenergy facilities using a modified GIS-based location–allocation-algorithm: Considering the spatial distribution of resource supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 309-316.
    4. Adrienne Grêt-Regamey & Bettina Weibel & Kenneth J Bagstad & Marika Ferrari & Davide Geneletti & Hermann Klug & Uta Schirpke & Ulrike Tappeiner, 2014. "On the Effects of Scale for Ecosystem Services Mapping," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Juan C Duque & Henry Laniado & Adriano Polo, 2018. "S-maup: Statistical test to measure the sensitivity to the modifiable areal unit problem," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Chris Brunsdon & Alexis Comber, 2021. "Opening practice: supporting reproducibility and critical spatial data science," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 477-496, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muyi Huang & Qilong Wang & Qi Yin & Weihua Li & Guozhao Zhang & Qiaojun Ke & Qin Guo, 2023. "Analysis of Ecosystem Service Contribution and Identification of Trade-Off/Synergy Relationship for Ecosystem Regulation in the Dabie Mountains of Western Anhui Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Turkeltaub, Tuvia & Gongadze, Kate & Lü, Yihe & Huang, Mingbin & Jia, Xiaoxu & Yang, Huiyi & Shao, Ming'an & Binley, Andrew & Harris, Paul & Wu, Lianhai, 2022. "A review of models for simulating the soil-plant interface for different climatic conditions and land uses in the Loess Plateau, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 474(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gilani Larimi, Niloofar & Azhdari, Abolghasem & Ghousi, Rouzbeh & Du, Bo, 2022. "Integrating GIS in reorganizing blood supply network in a robust-stochastic approach by combating disruption damages," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    2. Makovníková Jarmila & Pálka Boris & Kološta Stanislav & Flaška Filip & Orságová Katarína & Spišiaková Mária, 2020. "Non-Monetary Assessment and Mapping of the Potential of Agroecosystem Services in Rural Slovakia," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 257-276, June.
    3. Jin, Ming & Han, Xulong & Li, Mingyu, 2023. "Trade-offs of multiple urban ecosystem services based on land-use scenarios in the Tumen River cross-border area," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 482(C).
    4. Lorilla, Roxanne Suzette & Poirazidis, Konstantinos & Detsis, Vassilis & Kalogirou, Stamatis & Chalkias, Christos, 2020. "Socio-ecological determinants of multiple ecosystem services on the Mediterranean landscapes of the Ionian Islands (Greece)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 422(C).
    5. Jonathan Reades & Loretta Lees & Phil Hubbard & Guy Lansley, 2023. "Quantifying state-led gentrification in London: Using linked consumer and administrative records to trace displacement from council estates," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(4), pages 810-827, June.
    6. Costa, Fabrício Rodrigues & Ribeiro, Carlos Antonio Alvares Soares & Marcatti, Gustavo Eduardo & Lorenzon, Alexandre Simões & Teixeira, Thaisa Ribeiro & Domingues, Getulio Fonseca & Castro, Nero Lemos, 2020. "GIS applied to location of bioenergy plants in tropical agricultural areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 911-918.
    7. Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne & Weibel, Bettina, 2020. "Global assessment of mountain ecosystem services using earth observation data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    8. Deli Liu & Keqi Wang, 2023. "Research on the Siting of Rural Public Cultural Space Based on the Path-Clustering Algorithm: A Case Study of Yumin Township, Yushu City, Jilin Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Famoso, F. & Prestipino, M. & Brusca, S. & Galvagno, A., 2020. "Designing sustainable bioenergy from residual biomass: Site allocation criteria and energy/exergy performance indicators," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    10. Zahraee, Seyed Mojib & Shiwakoti, Nirajan & Stasinopoulos, Peter, 2022. "Application of geographical information system and agent-based modeling to estimate particle-gaseous pollutantemissions and transportation cost of woody biomass supply chain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    11. Jayarathna, Lasinidu & Kent, Geoff & O'Hara, Ian & Hobson, Philip, 2020. "A Geographical Information System based framework to identify optimal location and size of biomass energy plants using single or multiple biomass types," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    12. Stepinski, Tomasz & Dmowska, Anna, 2019. "Imperfect melting pot – analysis of changes in diversity and segregation of US urban census tracts in the period of 1990-2010," SocArXiv uqj8x, Center for Open Science.
    13. Cebi, Selcuk & Ilbahar, Esra & Atasoy, Aylin, 2016. "A fuzzy information axiom based method to determine the optimal location for a biomass power plant: A case study in Aegean Region of Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 894-907.
    14. Saha, Mithun & Eckelman, Matthew J., 2015. "Geospatial assessment of potential bioenergy crop production on urban marginal land," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 540-547.
    15. Hammad, Ahmed W A & Akbarnezhad, Ali & Rey, David, 2017. "Sustainable urban facility location: Minimising noise pollution and network congestion," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 38-59.
    16. Silvia Ronchi, 2021. "Ecosystem Services for Planning: A Generic Recommendation or a Real Framework? Insights from a Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    17. Xiang Zhao & Xiaoya Ma & Kun Wang & Yuqing Long & Dongjie Zhang & Zhanchun Xiao, 2017. "A Spatially Explicit Optimization Model for Agricultural Straw-Based Power Plant Site Selection: A Case Study in Hubei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, May.
    18. Venla Niva & Alexander Horton & Vili Virkki & Matias Heino & Maria Kosonen & Marko Kallio & Pekka Kinnunen & Guy J. Abel & Raya Muttarak & Maija Taka & Olli Varis & Matti Kummu, 2023. "World’s human migration patterns in 2000–2019 unveiled by high-resolution data," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(11), pages 2023-2037, November.
    19. Eftychia Ntostoglou & Dilip Khatiwada & Viktoria Martin, 2021. "The Potential Contribution of Decentralized Anaerobic Digestion towards Urban Biowaste Recovery Systems: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Roxanne Suzette Lorilla & Konstantinos Poirazidis & Stamatis Kalogirou & Vassilis Detsis & Aristotelis Martinis, 2018. "Assessment of the Spatial Dynamics and Interactions among Multiple Ecosystem Services to Promote Effective Policy Making across Mediterranean Island Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-28, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:399-:d:766998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.