IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jgeosy/v23y2021i4d10.1007_s10109-020-00334-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opening practice: supporting reproducibility and critical spatial data science

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Brunsdon

    (Maynooth University)

  • Alexis Comber

    (University of Leeds)

Abstract

This paper reflects on a number of trends towards a more open and reproducible approach to geographic and spatial data science over recent years. In particular, it considers trends towards Big Data, and the impacts this is having on spatial data analysis and modelling. It identifies a turn in academia towards coding as a core analytic tool, and away from proprietary software tools offering ‘black boxes’ where the internal workings of the analysis are not revealed. It is argued that this closed form software is problematic and considers a number of ways in which issues identified in spatial data analysis (such as the MAUP) could be overlooked when working with closed tools, leading to problems of interpretation and possibly inappropriate actions and policies based on these. In addition, this paper considers the role that reproducible and open spatial science may play in such an approach, taking into account the issues raised. It highlights the dangers of failing to account for the geographical properties of data, now that all data are spatial (they are collected somewhere), the problems of a desire for $$n$$ n = all observations in data science and it identifies the need for a critical approach. This is one in which openness, transparency, sharing and reproducibility provide a mantra for defensible and robust spatial data science.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Brunsdon & Alexis Comber, 2021. "Opening practice: supporting reproducibility and critical spatial data science," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 477-496, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:23:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10109-020-00334-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10109-020-00334-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10109-020-00334-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10109-020-00334-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nick Barnes, 2010. "Publish your computer code: it is good enough," Nature, Nature, vol. 467(7317), pages 753-753, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexis Comber & Paul Harris, 2022. "The Importance of Scale and the MAUP for Robust Ecosystem Service Evaluations and Landscape Decisions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Jonathan Reades & Loretta Lees & Phil Hubbard & Guy Lansley, 2023. "Quantifying state-led gentrification in London: Using linked consumer and administrative records to trace displacement from council estates," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(4), pages 810-827, June.
    3. Rowe, Francisco & Calafiore, Alessia & Arribas-Bel, Dani & Samardzhiev, Krasen & Fleischmann, Martin, 2022. "Urban Exodus? Understanding Human Mobility in Britain During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Facebook Data," OSF Preprints 6hjv3, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hunter, Kevin & Sreepathi, Sarat & DeCarolis, Joseph F., 2013. "Modeling for insight using Tools for Energy Model Optimization and Analysis (Temoa)," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 339-349.
    2. Malika Ihle & Isabel S. Winney & Anna Krystalli & Michael Croucher, 2017. "Striving for transparent and credible research: practical guidelines for behavioral ecologists," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(2), pages 348-354.
    3. Zwickl-Bernhard, Sebastian & Auer, Hans, 2021. "Open-source modeling of a low-carbon urban neighborhood with high shares of local renewable generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    4. Berk Ekmekci & Charles E McAnany & Cameron Mura, 2016. "An Introduction to Programming for Bioscientists: A Python-Based Primer," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-43, June.
    5. Leonidas Liakos & Panos Panagos, 2022. "Challenges in the Geo-Processing of Big Soil Spatial Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Sacha Hodencq & Mathieu Brugeron & Jaume Fitó & Lou Morriet & Benoit Delinchant & Frédéric Wurtz, 2021. "OMEGAlpes, an Open-Source Optimisation Model Generation Tool to Support Energy Stakeholders at District Scale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-30, September.
    7. Rahul Savani & Bernhard Stengel, 2015. "Game Theory Explorer: software for the applied game theorist," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 5-33, January.
    8. Daniel Russel & Keren Lasker & Ben Webb & Javier Velázquez-Muriel & Elina Tjioe & Dina Schneidman-Duhovny & Bret Peterson & Andrej Sali, 2012. "Putting the Pieces Together: Integrative Modeling Platform Software for Structure Determination of Macromolecular Assemblies," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-5, January.
    9. DeCarolis, Joseph F. & Hunter, Kevin & Sreepathi, Sarat, 2012. "The case for repeatable analysis with energy economy optimization models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1845-1853.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Critical data science; Open source; GIScience; Geocomputation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C00 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - General
    • Z00 - Other Special Topics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:23:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10109-020-00334-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.