IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i10p1748-d936897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Collaborative, Systems Approach for the Development of Biomass-Based Value Webs: The Case of the Acrocomia Palm

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo Vargas-Carpintero

    (Department of Biobased Resources in the Bioeconomy (340b), University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Thomas Hilger

    (Department of Agronomy in the Tropics and Subtropics (490e), University of Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 13, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Karen Tiede

    (Research Center for Global Food Security and Ecosystems (GFE), University of Hohenheim, Wollgrasweg 43, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Carolin Callenius

    (Research Center for Global Food Security and Ecosystems (GFE), University of Hohenheim, Wollgrasweg 43, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Johannes Mössinger

    (UNIQUE—Forestry and Land Use GmbH, Schnewlinstraße 10, 79098 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany)

  • Roney Fraga Souza

    (Faculty of Economy, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Av. Fernando Corrêa da Costa, 2367, Cuiabá 78060-900, Brazil)

  • Juan Carlos Barroso Armas

    (Department of Agronomy in the Tropics and Subtropics (490e), University of Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 13, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Frank Rasche

    (Department of Agronomy in the Tropics and Subtropics (490e), University of Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 13, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Iris Lewandowski

    (Department of Biobased Resources in the Bioeconomy (340b), University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

The diversification of biomass resources is key to the transition towards a bioeconomy. Acrocomia spp., a neotropical genus of palms, is an example of plants’ diversity potential for a sustainable bioeconomy. Acrocomia’s adaptability to environments outside rainforests, its specific fruit properties and high yields has generated the interest of researchers and entrepreneurs, triggering its introduction as a multipurpose oil crop. Developing sustainability-oriented and knowledge-based acrocomia value webs requires a collaborative, systems approach from the outset. Fostering an inter- and transdisciplinary dialogue on acrocomia through a participatory workshop with both academic and non-academic actors contributed to this endeavor. This allowed the identification of priorities, knowledge gaps, and stakeholder roles, and served as the basis for the co-creation of a research and development roadmap. Key steps for the introduction of acrocomia include intertwined technical aspects relating to the development of planting material, cultivation systems, processing technologies and applications, market entry, and value web governance aspects. A broad collaboration among scientists, the public and private sectors, farmers, and civil society, is required for the development of acrocomia value webs. The incorporation of sustainability and a consideration of context in the design and development phases are fundamental to fostering the sustainable performance of acrocomia value webs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo Vargas-Carpintero & Thomas Hilger & Karen Tiede & Carolin Callenius & Johannes Mössinger & Roney Fraga Souza & Juan Carlos Barroso Armas & Frank Rasche & Iris Lewandowski, 2022. "A Collaborative, Systems Approach for the Development of Biomass-Based Value Webs: The Case of the Acrocomia Palm," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-31, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1748-:d:936897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1748/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1748/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annemarie Wurz & Teja Tscharntke & Dominic Andreas Martin & Kristina Osen & Anjaharinony A. N. A. Rakotomalala & Estelle Raveloaritiana & Fanilo Andrianisaina & Saskia Dröge & Thio Rosin Fulgence & Ma, 2022. "Win-win opportunities combining high yields with high multi-taxa biodiversity in tropical agroforestry," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    3. Mairon G. Bastos Lima, 2018. "Toward Multipurpose Agriculture: Food, Fuels, Flex Crops, and Prospects for a Bioeconomy," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 18(2), pages 143-150, May.
    4. Dalemans, Floris & Muys, Bart & Maertens, Miet, 2019. "Adoption Constraints for Small-scale Agroforestry-based Biofuel Systems in India," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 27-39.
    5. Lopes, Daniela de Carvalho & Steidle Neto, Antonio José & Mendes, Adriano Aguiar & Pereira, Débora Tamires Vítor, 2013. "Economic feasibility of biodiesel production from Macauba in Brazil," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 819-824.
    6. John Bryden & Stig S. Gezelius & Karen Refsgaard & Judith Sutz, 2017. "Inclusive innovation in the bioeconomy: concepts and directions for research," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Jules Pretty & Tim G. Benton & Zareen Pervez Bharucha & Lynn V. Dicks & Cornelia Butler Flora & H. Charles J. Godfray & Dave Goulson & Sue Hartley & Nic Lampkin & Carol Morris & Gary Pierzynski & P. V, 2018. "Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable intensification," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(8), pages 441-446, August.
    8. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    9. Andreas Pyka, 2017. "Transformation of Economic Systems: The Bio-Economy Case," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Stephan Dabbert & Iris Lewandowski & Jochen Weiss & Andreas Pyka (ed.), Knowledge-Driven Developments in the Bioeconomy, pages 3-16, Springer.
    10. Iris Lewandowski, 2017. "Increasing Biomass Production to Sustain the Bioeconomy," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Stephan Dabbert & Iris Lewandowski & Jochen Weiss & Andreas Pyka (ed.), Knowledge-Driven Developments in the Bioeconomy, pages 179-203, Springer.
    11. Stephan Dabbert & Iris Lewandowski & Jochen Weiss & Andreas Pyka (ed.), 2017. "Knowledge-Driven Developments in the Bioeconomy," Economic Complexity and Evolution, Springer, number 978-3-319-58374-7, June.
    12. Patrick Caron & Denis Loeillet & Alain Rival & Frédéric Lançon & Ludovic Temple & Estelle Biénabe & Benoit Daviron & Jannine Sarraut-Woods & Anne Legile & Naomi Noël & Florence Mouton & Didier Baillet, 2017. "Sustainable Development and Tropical Agri-chains," Selected Books, CIRAD, Forest department, UPR40, edition 1, volume 1, number 20 edited by Estelle Biénabe & Denis Loeillet & Alain Rival.
    13. Shackleton, Charlie M. & Pandey, Ashok K., 2014. "Positioning non-timber forest products on the development agenda," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-7.
    14. Furtado, André Tosi & Scandiffio, Mirna Ivonne Gaya & Cortez, Luis Augusto Barbosa, 2011. "The Brazilian sugarcane innovation system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 156-166, January.
    15. Klein, Bruno Colling & Chagas, Mateus Ferreira & Junqueira, Tassia Lopes & Rezende, Mylene Cristina Alves Ferreira & Cardoso, Terezinha de Fátima & Cavalett, Otavio & Bonomi, Antonio, 2018. "Techno-economic and environmental assessment of renewable jet fuel production in integrated Brazilian sugarcane biorefineries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 290-305.
    16. Ki-Wan Kim, 2006. "Measuring international research collaboration of peripheral countries: Taking the context into consideration," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 66(2), pages 231-240, February.
    17. Bohn, Eduardo, 2009. ""Tablero de comando" para la promoción de los biocombustibles en Paraguay," Documentos de Proyectos 3694, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    18. Arnold, J. E. Michael & Perez, M. Ruiz, 2001. "Can non-timber forest products match tropical forest conservation and development objectives?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 437-447, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephanie Lang & Giulia Minnucci & Matthias Mueller & Michael P. Schlaile, 2023. "The Role of Consumers in Business Model Innovations for a Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Kiefer, Katharina & Kremer, Jasper & Zeitner, Philipp & Winkler, Bastian & Wagner, Moritz & von Cossel, Moritz, 2023. "Monetizing ecosystem services of perennial wild plant mixtures for bioenergy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Lourdes Ordoñez Olivo & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Shaping the Knowledge Base of Bioeconomy Sectors Development in Latin American and Caribbean Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Juan F. Prados-Castillo & Miguel Ángel Solano-Sánchez & Pilar Guaita Fernández & José Manuel Guaita Martínez, 2023. "Potential of the Crypto Economy in Financial Management and Fundraising for Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Ishtiyak Ahmad Peerzada & Mohammad A. Islam & James Chamberlain & Shalini Dhyani & Mohan Reddy & Somidh Saha, 2022. "Potential of NTFP Based Bioeconomy in Livelihood Security and Income Inequality Mitigation in Kashmir Himalayas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Gour Gobinda Goswami & Tahmid Labib, 2022. "Modeling COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics: A Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Wirapong Chansanam & Chunqiu Li, 2022. "Scientometrics of Poverty Research for Sustainability Development: Trend Analysis of the 1964–2022 Data through Scopus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Zhichao Wang & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2021. "Performance Analysis of Hospitals in Australia and its Peers: A Systematic Review," CEPA Working Papers Series WP012021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    7. Abdulaziz I. Almulhim & Simon Elias Bibri & Ayyoob Sharifi & Shakil Ahmad & Khalid Mohammed Almatar, 2022. "Emerging Trends and Knowledge Structures of Urbanization and Environmental Sustainability: A Regional Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    8. Jin Su & Mo Wang & Mohd Adib Mohammad Razi & Norlida Mohd Dom & Noralfishah Sulaiman & Lai-Wai Tan, 2023. "A Bibliometric Review of Nature-Based Solutions on Urban Stormwater Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Khan, Ashraf & Goodell, John W. & Hassan, M. Kabir & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2022. "A bibliometric review of finance bibliometric papers," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    10. Cinzia Daraio & Simone Di Leo & Loet Leydesdorff, 2022. "Using the Leiden Rankings as a Heuristics: Evidence from Italian universities in the European landscape," LEM Papers Series 2022/08, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    11. Zamani, Mehdi & Yalcin, Haydar & Naeini, Ali Bonyadi & Zeba, Gordana & Daim, Tugrul U, 2022. "Developing metrics for emerging technologies: identification and assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Abidin Kemeç & Ayşenur Tarakcıoglu Altınay, 2023. "Sustainable Energy Research Trend: A Bibliometric Analysis Using VOSviewer, RStudio Bibliometrix, and CiteSpace Software Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Clemente Rodríguez-Sabiote & Álvaro Manuel Úbeda-Sánchez & Oswaldo Lorenzo-Quiles & José Álvarez-Rodríguez, 2023. "Knowledge structures of scientific production on COVID-19 in the sphere of education: the case of publications indexed in the Web of Science during 2020," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4285-4305, October.
    14. Shiwangi Singh & Sanjay Dhir, 2019. "Structured review using TCCM and bibliometric analysis of international cause-related marketing, social marketing, and innovation of the firm," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 16(2), pages 335-347, December.
    15. Sophie Urmetzer & Michael P. Schlaile & Kristina B. Bogner & Matthias Mueller & Andreas Pyka, 2018. "Exploring the Dedicated Knowledge Base of a Transformation towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Ivone de Bem Oliveira & Rhewter Nunes & Lucia Mattiello & Stela Barros-Ribeiro & Isabela Pavanelli Souza & Alexandre Siqueira Guedes Coelho & Rosane Garcia Collevatti, 2019. "Research and partnership in studies of sugarcane using molecular markers: a scientometric approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(1), pages 335-355, April.
    17. Pan Zhang & Yongjun Du & Sijie Han & Qingan Qiu, 2022. "Global Progress in Oil and Gas Well Research Using Bibliometric Analysis Based on VOSviewer and CiteSpace," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-27, July.
    18. He-Li Sun & Yuan Feng & Qinge Zhang & Jia-Xin Li & Yue-Ying Wang & Zhaohui Su & Teris Cheung & Todd Jackson & Sha Sha & Yu-Tao Xiang, 2022. "The Microbiome–Gut–Brain Axis and Dementia: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Dharmani, Pranav & Das, Satyasiba & Prashar, Sanjeev, 2021. "A bibliometric analysis of creative industries: Current trends and future directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 252-267.
    20. Pahrudin Pahrudin & Li-Wei Liu & Shao-Yu Li, 2022. "What Is the Role of Tourism Management and Marketing toward Sustainable Tourism? A Bibliometric Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1748-:d:936897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.