IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i5p530-d555880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Causal Analysis of Ecological Impairment in Land Ecosystem on a Regional Scale: Applied to a Mining City Daye, China

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Guo

    (School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Yiyun Chen

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Min Chen

    (Guangzhou Urban Planning & Design Survey Research Institute, Guangzhou 510060, China)

  • Chaojun Wang

    (Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, Yancheng 224005, China)

  • Zeyi Chen

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Weinan Cai

    (School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Renjie Li

    (School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Weiming Feng

    (School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Ming Jiang

    (School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

We adopted a weight of evidence approach to establish a causal analysis of an impaired land ecosystem on a regional scale; namely, Daye, a traditional mining city in China. Working processes, including problem statements, a list of candidate causes, and a conceptual model were developed to represent a causal hypothesis for describing land degradation. Causal criteria were applied to integrate multiple lines of evidence. Then, various pieces of evidence were scored to either strengthen or weaken our causal assumptions. Results showed that habitat alteration, heavy metal accumulation, organic pollutants, water eutrophication, and nutrient runoff were the probable causes of land ecosystem impairment in Daye. Meanwhile, noxious gas, toxicants, altered underground runoff, atmospheric deposition, and acid rain were identified as possible causes. The most unlikely causes were altered hydrology, altered earth surface runoff, and soil erosion. Soil salinization, soluble inorganic salts, biological species invasion, and pathogens were deferred as delayed causes due to lack of adequate information. The causal analysis approach was applied to identify the primary causes of land degradation and implement accurate protective measures in an impaired land ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Guo & Yiyun Chen & Min Chen & Chaojun Wang & Zeyi Chen & Weinan Cai & Renjie Li & Weiming Feng & Ming Jiang, 2021. "Causal Analysis of Ecological Impairment in Land Ecosystem on a Regional Scale: Applied to a Mining City Daye, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:5:p:530-:d:555880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/5/530/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/5/530/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucian Vesalon & Remus Creţan, 2013. "Mono-industrialism and the Struggle for Alternative Development: the Case of the Roşia Montană Gold-mining Project," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 104(5), pages 539-555, December.
    2. Li, Huijuan & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong, 2013. "Economic transition policies in Chinese resource-based cities: An overview of government efforts," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 251-260.
    3. Fusuo Zhang & Xinping Chen & Peter Vitousek, 2013. "An experiment for the world," Nature, Nature, vol. 497(7447), pages 33-35, May.
    4. Zhang, Ling & Zhang, Lei & Xu, Yan & Zhou, Peng & Yeh, Chung-Hsing, 2020. "Evaluating urban land use efficiency with interacting criteria: An empirical study of cities in Jiangsu China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. David Tilman & Kenneth G. Cassman & Pamela A. Matson & Rosamond Naylor & Stephen Polasky, 2002. "Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6898), pages 671-677, August.
    6. Douglas L. Weed, 2005. "Weight of Evidence: A Review of Concept and Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1545-1557, December.
    7. Velicu, Irina, 2019. "De-growing environmental justice: Reflections from anti-mining movements in Eastern Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 271-278.
    8. Matthew Rodell & Isabella Velicogna & James S. Famiglietti, 2009. "Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India," Nature, Nature, vol. 460(7258), pages 999-1002, August.
    9. Christopher N. Kaiser-Bunbury & James Mougal & Andrew E. Whittington & Terence Valentin & Ronny Gabriel & Jens M. Olesen & Nico Blüthgen, 2017. "Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination network resilience and function," Nature, Nature, vol. 542(7640), pages 223-227, February.
    10. Ruishan Chen & Chao Ye, 2014. "Resolving soil pollution in China," Nature, Nature, vol. 505(7484), pages 483-483, January.
    11. Huiming Zhang & Lifang Xiong & Yueming Qiu & Dequn Zhou, 2017. "How Have Political Incentives for Local Officials Reduced Environmental Pollution in Resource-Depleted Cities?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Turner, Katrine Grace & Anderson, Sharolyn & Gonzales-Chang, Mauricio & Costanza, Robert & Courville, Sasha & Dalgaard, Tommy & Dominati, Estelle & Kubiszewski, Ida & Ogilvy, Sue & Porfirio, Luciana &, 2016. "A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 190-207.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oimahmad Rahmonov & Jacek Różkowski & Grzegorz Klys, 2022. "The Managing and Restoring of Degraded Land in Post-Mining Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-3, February.
    2. Min Yang & Jianghua Zhang & Huaqing Chen & Hailing Ke & Youning Xu, 2023. "Human health risk assessment of toxic elements in soils and crops around Xiaoqinling gold-mining area, Northwestern China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(2), pages 283-303, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhipeng Tang & Ziao Mei & Jialing Zou, 2021. "Does the Opening of High-Speed Railway Lines Reduce the Carbon Intensity of China’s Resource-Based Cities?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Ying Liu & Chenggang Wang & Zeng Tang & Zhibiao Nan, 2017. "Farmland Rental and Productivity of Wheat and Maize: An Empirical Study in Gansu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Ram Fishman, 2018. "Groundwater depletion limits the scope for adaptation to increased rainfall variability in India," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 195-209, March.
    4. Yu, Weihua & Peng, Yiwen & Yao, Xin, 2022. "The effects of China's supporting policy for resource-exhausted cities on local energy efficiency: An empirical study based on 284 cities in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Sucharita Pradhan & Anirban Dhar & Kamlesh Narayan Tiwari & Satiprasad Sahoo, 2023. "Spatiotemporal analysis of land use land cover and future simulation for agricultural sustainability in a sub-tropical region of India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7873-7902, August.
    6. Zeng, Lijun & Wang, Jinfeng & Zhang, Jinshuo & Lv, Jun & Cui, Wei, 2020. "New Urbanization paths in mineral resource abundant regions in China: A three-dimensional cube framework," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Lu, Hongyou & Liu, Min & Song, Wenjing, 2022. "Place-based policies, government intervention, and regional innovation: Evidence from China's Resource-Exhausted City program," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    8. Elisa Morri & Riccardo Santolini, 2021. "Ecosystem Services Valuation for the Sustainable Land Use Management by Nature-Based Solution (NbS) in the Common Agricultural Policy Actions: A Case Study on the Foglia River Basin (Marche Region, It," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Liu, Duan & Tang, Runcheng & Xie, Jun & Tian, Jingjing & Shi, Rui & Zhang, Kai, 2020. "Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    10. Tiantian Ma & Youwen Zhang & Qingbai Hu & Minghai Han & Xiaohua Li & Youjun Zhang & Zhiguang Li & Rongguang Shi, 2022. "Accumulation Characteristics and Pollution Evaluation of Soil Heavy Metals in Different Land Use Types: Study on the Whole Region of Tianjin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Shen Yuan & Shaobing Peng, 2017. "Exploring the Trends in Nitrogen Input and Nitrogen Use Efficiency for Agricultural Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Meena, Raj Pal & Karnam, Venkatesh & R, Sendhil & Rinki, & Sharma, R.K. & Tripathi, S.C. & Singh, Gyanendra Pratap, 2019. "Identification of water use efficient wheat genotypes with high yield for regions of depleting water resources in India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Valbuena, Diego & Tui, Sabine Homann-Kee & Erenstein, Olaf & Teufel, Nils & Duncan, Alan & Abdoulaye, Tahirou & Swain, Braja & Mekonnen, Kindu & Germaine, Ibro & Gérard, Bruno, 2015. "Identifying determinants, pressures and trade-offs of crop residue use in mixed smallholder farms in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 107-118.
    14. Katarina Arvidsson Segerkvist & Helena Hansson & Ulf Sonesson & Stefan Gunnarsson, 2021. "A Systematic Mapping of Current Literature on Sustainability at Farm-Level in Beef and Lamb Meat Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, February.
    15. Vainio, Annukka & Tienhaara, Annika & Haltia, Emmi & Hyvönen, Terho & Pyysiäinen, Jarkko & Pouta, Eija, 2021. "The legitimacy of result-oriented and action-oriented agri-environmental schemes: A comparison of farmers’ and citizens’ perceptions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    16. Hualin Xie & Yingqian Huang & Qianru Chen & Yanwei Zhang & Qing Wu, 2019. "Prospects for Agricultural Sustainable Intensification: A Review of Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-27, October.
    17. Li, Cunfang & Li, Danping & Zhang, Xiaoxu, 2019. "Why can China's coal resource-exhausted enterprises cross the district to transfer?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 94-105.
    18. Smith, Helen F. & Sullivan, Caroline A., 2014. "Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes—Farmers' perceptions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 72-80.
    19. Paul L. G. Vlek & Asia Khamzina & Hossein Azadi & Anik Bhaduri & Luna Bharati & Ademola Braimoh & Christopher Martius & Terry Sunderland & Fatemeh Taheri, 2017. "Trade-Offs in Multi-Purpose Land Use under Land Degradation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Diriba Shiferaw G., 2017. "Water-Nutrients Interaction: Exploring the Effects of Water as a Central Role for Availability & Use Efficiency of Nutrients by Shallow Rooted Vegetable Crops - A Review," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 3(10), pages 78-93, 10-2017.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:5:p:530-:d:555880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.