IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i1p16-d1311662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Firm Performance of Saudi Manufacturers: Does the Management of Cash Conversion Cycle Components Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Amel Kouaib

    (Accounting Department, School of Business, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammed Ibrahim Bu Haya

    (Accounting Department, School of Business, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the liquidity management of a corporation. It aims to examine how managing cash conversion cycle components affects corporate performance. A dataset of 88 firms listed on the Saudi Stock Exchange between 2018 and 2022 was analyzed using both pooled OLS and fixed effects regression models. A sample of 84 firms listed on the Saudi Stock Exchange for the period from 2018 to 2022 was used. Both the pooled OLS and the fixed effects regression models were used. This study’s key findings are: (1) there is a strong negative correlation between the time it takes to convert inventory into sales (inventory conversion period) and firm performance. If inventory does not sell quickly, profit tends to be lower. (2) Firm performance demonstrates a strong inverse relationship with the duration it takes for companies to collect cash from customers, commonly known as the accounts receivable collection period. A short accounts receivable collection period may become collectible and increase a business’s profitability and performance. (3) There is a highly significant negative link between the time taken to pay creditors (days payable outstanding) and firm performance. A short average payment period, indicated by a low payment period, suggests that the firm is promptly settling its bills and obligations without any delays.

Suggested Citation

  • Amel Kouaib & Mohammed Ibrahim Bu Haya, 2024. "Firm Performance of Saudi Manufacturers: Does the Management of Cash Conversion Cycle Components Matter?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:16-:d:1311662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/1/16/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/1/16/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vishal Gaur & Marshall L. Fisher & Ananth Raman, 2005. "An Econometric Analysis of Inventory Turnover Performance in Retail Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 181-194, February.
    2. Sandra Maria Geraldes Alves, 2011. "The effect of the board structure on earnings management: evidence from Portugal," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(2), pages 141-160, October.
    3. Sandra Maria Geraldes Alves, 2011. "The effect of the board structure on earnings management: evidence from Portugal," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(2), pages 141-160, October.
    4. Dimitrios P. Koumanakos, 2008. "The effect of inventory management on firm performance," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 57(5), pages 355-369, June.
    5. Stefan Beiner & Wolfgang Drobetz & Frank Schmid & Heinz Zimmermann, 2004. "Is Board Size an Independent Corporate Governance Mechanism?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 327-356, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baron, Opher & Callen, Jeffrey L. & Segal, Dan, 2023. "Does the bullwhip matter economically? A cross-sectional firm-level analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Barcos, Lucía & Barroso, Alicia & Surroca, Jordi & Tribó, Josep A., 2013. "Corporate social responsibility and inventory policy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 580-588.
    3. Yingying Xin & Xiao Zeng & Zhengying Luo, 2022. "Customers' tone in MD&A disclosure and suppliers' inventory efficiency: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3833-3853, December.
    4. Kroes, James R. & Manikas, Andrew S. & Gattiker, Thomas F., 2018. "Operational leanness and retail firm performance since 1980," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 262-274.
    5. Jessica L. Darby & David J. Ketchen & Brent D. Williams & Travis Tokar, 2020. "The Implications of Firm‐Specific Policy Risk, Policy Uncertainty, and Industry Factors for Inventory: A Resource Dependence Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(4), pages 3-24, October.
    6. Sampath Rajagopalan, 2013. "Impact of Variety and Distribution System Characteristics on Inventory Levels at U.S. Retailers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 191-204, May.
    7. Dara G. Schniederjans & Mehrnaz Khalajhedayati, 2021. "Competitive sustainability and stakeholder engagement: Exploring awareness, motivation, and capability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 808-824, February.
    8. Fatma Tifafi & Dominique Dufour, 2006. "Une analyse de la présence d'administrateurs indépendants au sein du conseil d'administration : contrôle ou conseil ?," Post-Print halshs-00558255, HAL.
    9. Godfred Adjapong Afrifa & Ahmad Alshehabi & Ishmael Tingbani & Hussein Halabi, 2021. "Abnormal inventory and performance in manufacturing companies: evidence from the trade credit channel," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 581-617, February.
    10. Iwasaki, Ichiro & 岩﨑, 一郎 & イワサキ, イチロウ, 2007. "Endogenous board formation and its determinants in a transition economy: evidence from Russia," CEI Working Paper Series 2007-1, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    11. Bendig, David & Brettel, Malte & Downar, Benedikt, 2018. "Inventory component volatility and its relation to returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 37-49.
    12. Klaus Brockhoff, 2006. "Technologischer Wandel und Corporate Governance," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(54), pages 7-31, January.
    13. Folinas, Dimitris & Shen, Chia-Yi, 2014. "Exploring Links among Inventory and Financial Performance in the Agricultural Machinery," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 2(4), pages 1-12, October.
    14. Niar, Hikma & Jamali, Hisnol, 2018. "Determinants Of Profitability And Firm Values In The Manufacturing Sector Of Firms In Indonesia," OSF Preprints 9azju, Center for Open Science.
    15. Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh, 2017. "The relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and the performance of Saudi listed firms," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14(2-2), pages 338-349.
    16. Weili Yin & Wenxue Ran, 2023. "Explaining Firm Performance During the COVID-19 With fsQCA: The Role of Supply Network Complexity, Inventory Turns, and Geographic Dispersion," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    17. Hong Chen & Murray Z. Frank & Owen Q. Wu, 2007. "U.S. Retail and Wholesale Inventory Performance from 1981 to 2004," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 430-456, April.
    18. Dongling Cai & Li Jiang, 2020. "The Bright and Dark Sides of Customer Switching," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(6), pages 1381-1396, June.
    19. Howard P. Marvel & James Peck, 2008. "Inventory Turnover and Product Variety," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 51(3), pages 461-478, August.
    20. Christopher Groening & Cheryl‐lyn Ngoh & Ryan Luchs, 2022. "The impact of a firm's corporate social responsibility on firm–supplier relationships: The effect of secondary stakeholder CSR on inventory days," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1689-1705, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:16-:d:1311662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.