IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v13y2020i11p252-d435470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mixed Methods Utilisation in Innovation Management Research: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Summary

Author

Listed:
  • Klaudia Bracio

    (Doctoral School, Cracow University of Economics, 27 Rakowicka St., 31-510 Krakow, Poland)

  • Marek Szarucki

    (Department of Strategic Analysis, College of Management Sciences and Quality, Cracow University of Economics, 27 Rakowicka St., 31-510 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

The main purpose of this article is to explore the application of mixed methods research in the innovation management sub-discipline utilizing a systematic literature review and meta-summary analysis. Regardless of the growing number of studies in innovation management there is still a lack of research that integrates and synthesizes this body of knowledge. Our review of 93 articles from Web of Science and Scopus databases, including content analysis, presents trends and research background in innovation management that use the mixed methods approach. This study addresses the inconsistencies in the literature and presents a holistic picture of what existing empirical studies have found to date. In addition, we have developed an innovation management model based on selected theoretical lenses to enable future researchers in a given area to choose the appropriate method. The results of the meta-summary show that 50.54% articles from our dataset are related to partially mixed dominant sequential methods, 12.90% fully mixed dominant sequential methods and 11.83% fully mixed dominant concurrent methods. We identified several research gaps and provided a future research avenue in the context of innovation management. The article analyzes empirical papers, enables identification of problems in the current research and identifies trends in the area of the studied phenomenon. The results on the topic of mixed methods in innovation management and used tools have indicated that this issue is still in a premature phase but with an upward trend of research development.

Suggested Citation

  • Klaudia Bracio & Marek Szarucki, 2020. "Mixed Methods Utilisation in Innovation Management Research: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Summary," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-27, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:13:y:2020:i:11:p:252-:d:435470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/13/11/252/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/13/11/252/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Spiegel & Christian Marxt, 2015. "Understanding and breaking innovation lock-in effects," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 266-285.
    2. Yi Shen, 2019. "Create synergies and inspire collaborations around the development of intelligent infrastructure for human‐centered communities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(6), pages 596-606, June.
    3. Cameron, Roslyn, 2011. "Mixed methods in business and management: A call to the ‘first generation’," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 245-267, March.
    4. Camisón, César & Villar-López, Ana, 2014. "Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2891-2902.
    5. Nancy Leech & Anthony Onwuegbuzie, 2009. "A typology of mixed methods research designs," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 265-275, March.
    6. Usama Awan, 2019. "Effects of buyer-supplier relationship on social performance improvement and innovation performance improvement," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 21-35.
    7. Usama Awan & Andrzej Kraslawski & Janne Huiskonen, 2018. "Governing Interfirm Relationships for Social Sustainability: The Relationship between Governance Mechanisms, Sustainable Collaboration, and Cultural Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Lütjen, Heiner & Schultz, Carsten & Tietze, Frank & Urmetzer, Florian, 2019. "Managing ecosystems for service innovation: A dynamic capability view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 506-519.
    9. Cooper, Robert G., 1990. "Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 44-54.
    10. Hayter, Christopher S., 2016. "Constraining entrepreneurial development: A knowledge-based view of social networks among academic entrepreneurs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 475-490.
    11. Ghezzi, Antonio, 2019. "Digital startups and the adoption and implementation of Lean Startup Approaches: Effectuation, Bricolage and Opportunity Creation in practice," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 945-960.
    12. Linda H. M. van de Burgwal & Ana Dias & Eric Claassen, 2019. "Incentives for knowledge valorisation: a European benchmark," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Ronald Klingebiel & John Joseph, 2016. "Entry timing and innovation strategy in feature phones," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1002-1020, June.
    14. Rawan K. Ghaben & Ayham A.M. Jaaron, 2017. "Identifying and assessing innovation factors in construction projects in Palestine: an empirical study," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 350-373.
    15. Dosi, Giovanni, 1993. "Technological paradigms and technological trajectories : A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 102-103, April.
    16. Guidice, Rebecca M. & Mero, Neal P. & Matthews, Lucy M. & Greene, Juanne V., 2016. "The influence of individual regulatory focus and accountability form in a high performance work system," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3332-3340.
    17. Krzysztof Wach, 2016. "Innovative Behaviour of High-Tech Internationalized Firms: Survey Results from Poland," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 4(3), pages 153-165.
    18. Iturrioz, Cristina & Aragón, Cristina & Narvaiza, Lorea, 2015. "How to foster shared innovation within SMEs' networks: Social capital and the role of intermediaries," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 104-115.
    19. Bloch, Carter & Sørensen, Mads P. & Graversen, Ebbe K. & Schneider, Jesper W. & Schmidt, Evanthia Kalpazidou & Aagaard, Kaare & Mejlgaard, Niels, 2014. "Developing a methodology to assess the impact of research grant funding: A mixed methods approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 105-117.
    20. Richard Harrison & William Scheela & P. C. Lai & Sivapalan Vivekarajah, 2018. "Beyond institutional voids and the middle-income trap: The emerging business angel market in Malaysia," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 965-991, December.
    21. Ho, Yuen-Ping & Ruan, Yi & Hang, Chang-Chieh & Wong, Poh-Kam, 2016. "Technology upgrading of Small-and-Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) through a manpower secondment strategy – A mixed-methods study of Singapore's T-Up program," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 57, pages 21-29.
    22. Meghdad Ahmadi & Mohd. Hassan Mohd. Osman, 2020. "Exploitative dominant balanced ambidexterity solving the paradox of innovation strategies in SMEs," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(1), pages 79-107.
    23. JosephNg, P.S., 2018. "EaaS Optimization: Available yet hidden information technology infrastructure inside medium size enterprise," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 165-173.
    24. Kraus, Sascha & Kallmuenzer, Andreas & Stieger, Daniel & Peters, Mike & Calabrò, Andrea, 2018. "Entrepreneurial paths to family firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 382-387.
    25. Joe Tidd & John Bessant, 2018. "Innovation Management Challenges: From Fads To Fundamentals," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(05), pages 1-13, June.
    26. Christian Corsi & Antonio Prencipe, 2018. "Internal funding, debt and external equity: which of these effectively improve the growth of university spin-offs?," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(6), pages 638-662.
    27. Rocío Aliaga-Isla (PhD) & Alex Rialp (PhD), 2013. "Systematic review of immigrant entrepreneurship literature: previous findings and ways forward," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(9-10), pages 819-844, December.
    28. Reinhardt, Ronny & Gurtner, Sebastian, 2018. "The overlooked role of embeddedness in disruptive innovation theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 268-283.
    29. Eduardo Kunzel Teixeira & Mirian Oliveira & Carla Curado, 2019. "Linking knowledge management processes to innovation," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 43(3), pages 332-349, October.
    30. Scott L. Newbert, 2007. "Empirical research on the resource‐based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 121-146, February.
    31. Risimati Maurice Khosa & Vivence Kalitanyi, 2015. "Migration reasons, traits and entrepreneurial motivation of African immigrant entrepreneurs," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(2), pages 132-155, May.
    32. Duarte, Paulo & Pinho, José Carlos, 2019. "A mixed methods UTAUT2-based approach to assess mobile health adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 140-150.
    33. Bakhshi, Hasan & Edwards, John S. & Roper, Stephen & Scully, Judy & Shaw, Duncan & Morley, Lorraine & Rathbone, Nicola, 2015. "Assessing an experimental approach to industrial policy evaluation: Applying RCT+ to the case of Creative Credits," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(8), pages 1462-1472.
    34. Nazrul Islam & Kumiko Miyazaki, 2009. "NanoSI: Exploring nanotechnology research conflation and nano-innovation dynamism in the case of Japan," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(3), pages 170-182, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geissinger, Andrea & Laurell, Christofer & Öberg, Christina & Sandström, Christian, 2023. "Social media analytics for innovation management research: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khosravi, Pouria & Newton, Cameron & Rezvani, Azadeh, 2019. "Management innovation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of past decades of research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 694-707.
    2. Chang, Yuan-Chieh & Chen, Min-Nan, 2016. "Service regime and innovation clusters: An empirical study from service firms in Taiwan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1845-1857.
    3. Tahereh Maghsoudi & Rosalía Cascón-Pereira & Ana Beatriz Hernández Lara, 2020. "The Role of Collaborative Healthcare in Improving Social Sustainability: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Mohamed Mansouri & Cheklekbire Malainine & Hayat Souti & Ikram Cadimi, 2022. "Dynamic capabilities, competitiveness and performance of small and medium-sized enterprises: a systematic literature review [Capacités dynamiques, compétitivité et performance des petites et moyenn," Post-Print hal-03794567, HAL.
    5. Plantec, Quentin & Deval, Marie-Alix & Hooge, Sophie & Weil, Benoit, 2023. "Big data as an exploration trigger or problem-solving patch: Design and integration of AI-embedded systems in the automotive industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    6. Somohano Rodríguez, Francisco M. & López Fernández, José Manuel & Martínez García, Francisco Javier, 2018. "El efecto de la innovación en el resultado empresarial durante la recesión económica. Una aplicación a la industria de la automoción," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 91-105.
    7. Mingook Lee & Sungjoo Lee, 2016. "Evaluating Internal Technological Capabilities in Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Bhatt, Priyanka C. & Lai, Kuei-Kuei & Drave, Vinayak A. & Lu, Tzu-Chuen & Kumar, Vimal, 2023. "Patent analysis based technology innovation assessment with the lens of disruptive innovation theory: A case of blockchain technological trajectories," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Jaeheung YOO & Kibaek LEE & Munkee CHOI, 2013. "Crowdsourcing for Device Manufacturers in the Convergent Media Industry," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(89), pages 73-93, 1st quart.
    10. Józef Ober, 2020. "Innovation Adoption: Empirical Analysis on the Example of Selected Factors of Organizational Culture in the IT Industry in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    11. Alkaraan, Fadi & Albitar, Khaldoon & Hussainey, Khaled & Venkatesh, VG, 2022. "Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Chaudhary, Sanjay & Dhir, Amandeep & Ferraris, Alberto & Bertoldi, Bernando, 2021. "Trust and reputation in family businesses: A systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 143-161.
    13. Chirumalla, Koteshwar & Leoni, Luna & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2023. "Moving from servitization to digital servitization: Identifying the required dynamic capabilities and related microfoundations to facilitate the transition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Nils Grashof & Alexander Kopka, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and radical innovation: an opportunity for all companies?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 771-797, August.
    15. Arman Avadikyan & Gilles Lambert & Christophe Lerch, 2016. "A Multi-Level Perspective on Ambidexterity: The Case of a Synchrotron Research Facility," Working Papers of BETA 2016-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    16. Francesco Bogliacino & Mario Pianta, 2016. "The Pavitt Taxonomy, revisited: patterns of innovation in manufacturing and services," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 33(2), pages 153-180, August.
    17. Weking, Jörg & Desouza, Kevin C. & Fielt, Erwin & Kowalkiewicz, Marek, 2023. "Metaverse-enabled entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    18. Tedjo Soelaksono & Achmad Sudiro & Mintarti Rahayu & Sudjatno Sudjatno, 2018. "The Influence of Capability Managerial on Competitiveness of the Company through the Planning Strategy, Investment, Innovation and Performance of the Company (a Study on Corporate Manufacturing Indust," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(2), pages 22-32.
    19. Balland, Pierre-Alexandre & Boschma, Ron, 2022. "Do scientific capabilities in specific domains matter for technological diversification in European regions?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    20. Ilhan-Nas, Tulay & Okan, Tarhan & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Demirbag, Mehmet & Wood, Geoffrey & Glaister, Keith W., 2018. "Board composition, family ownership, institutional distance and the foreign equity ownership strategies of Turkish MNEs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 862-879.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:13:y:2020:i:11:p:252-:d:435470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.