IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v8y2020i1p6-d315885.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Advantages of Free Trade Port Construction in Shanghai under the Belt and Road Initiative

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Hu

    (The Centre for Modern Chinese City Studies & Institute of Urban Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    Geo-Studies Center, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Shufang Wang

    (Geo-Studies Center, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    School of Geographic and Environmental Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China)

  • Jin-liao He

    (The Centre for Modern Chinese City Studies & Institute of Urban Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

Abstract

As China’s opening-up grows wider under the Belt and Road Initiative, the exploration and construction of free trade ports have received increasing attention. In 2018, China’s first free trade port was settled in Hainan instead of Shanghai. In 2019, after the Lingang New Area of China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone was approved by the central government, six new pilot free trade zones were launched in Shandong, Hebei, Heilongjiang, Jiangsu, Yunnan, and Guangxi provinces. As the bridgehead of the Belt and Road Initiative, Shanghai established the first and biggest pilot free trade zone in China and gained the priority of institutional innovation exploration in Lingang New Area. Whether and how Shanghai will lead the construction of free trade ports and the new round of higher-level opening-up has become a research agenda that requires further study. Based on the document analysis, competition analysis and factor analysis in this paper, the following results were drawn out: (1) The construction of a free trade port is an upgrade of the 18 free trade zones and the 50 cities involved, and it needs more high-level opening-up, more sophisticated services, more rigorous supervision, and more professional talent; (2) With its geographical location, economic foundation, development support, and industrial services, Shanghai has the potential, foundation, and momentum to explore institutional innovation in the construction of pilot free trade zones and free trade port; (3) Development basis, port shipping, talent attraction, service support, risk supervision and control are the five major comparative advantages and the important driving factors that need to be considered in exploring and leading the construction of China’s free trade port under the higher quality development of the Belt and Road Initiative.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Hu & Shufang Wang & Jin-liao He, 2020. "Comparative Advantages of Free Trade Port Construction in Shanghai under the Belt and Road Initiative," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:6-:d:315885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/8/1/6/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/8/1/6/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bin Wang, 2017. "Employment in China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(4), pages 266-273, July.
    2. Miyagiwa, Kaz F., 1986. "A reconsideration of the welfare economics of a free-trade zone," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3-4), pages 337-350, November.
    3. Lorenzo Riccardi, 2016. "Investing in China through Free Trade Zones," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-662-47354-2, December.
    4. Sissani Midoun & Bengana Ismail, 2018. "Digital and Free Trade Zones Impact on Malaysia's Economy and Its Prospects (2000 2018)," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(4), pages 39-44.
    5. Paul R. Krugman, 1991. "The move toward free trade zones," Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 7-58.
    6. Dennis A. Rondinellli, 1987. "Export Processing Zones and Economic Development in Asia: A Review and Reassessment of a Means of Promoting Growth and Jobs," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 89-106, January.
    7. Delei Peng & Xiuyan Fei, 2017. "China’s Free Trade Zones: Regulatory Innovation, Legal Assessment and Economic Implication," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(4), pages 238-248, July.
    8. Ricardo,David, 2015. "On the Principles of Political Economy, and Taxation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108075435.
    9. Mona Kashiha & Craig Depken & Jean-Claude Thill, 2017. "Border effects in a free-trade zone: Evidence from European wine shipments," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 411-433.
    10. Jenkins, Mauricio & Arce, Ronald, 2016. "Do backward linkages in export processing zones increase dynamically? Firm-level evidence from Costa Rica," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 400-409.
    11. Guangwen Meng & Douglas Zhihua Zeng, . "Structural transformation through free trade zones: the case of Shanghai," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Artemis Chang & Rui Torres de Oliveira & Hsi-Mei Chung & Nan Zheng, 2022. "Subnational response differences on the Belt and Road Initiative policy and firm internationalization: A longitudinal and multi-level approach," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(2), pages 152-171, June.
    2. Jia Geng & Mingsheng Yuan & Shen Xu & Tingting Bai & Yang Xiao & Xiaopeng Li & Dong Xu, 2022. "Urban Expansion Was the Main Driving Force for the Decline in Ecosystem Services in Hainan Island during 1980–2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Lian-Sheng Tang & Xiang Tan & Peng Guo & Ting-Ting Huang & Tie-Li Liu, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of Locational Factors and Their External Influence on Free-Trade Port Zones in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Yuan Feng & Ying Li & Changfei Nie, 2023. "The Effect of Place-Based Policy on Urban Land Green Use Efficiency: Evidence from the Pilot Free-Trade Zone Establishment in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sissani Midoun & Bengana Ismail, 2018. "Digital and Free Trade Zones Impact on Malaysia's Economy and Its Prospects (2000 2018)," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(4), pages 39-44.
    2. Chandra Prakash Garg & Vishal Kashav & Xuemuge Wang, 2023. "Evaluating sustainability factors of green ports in China under fuzzy environment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7795-7821, August.
    3. Panagariya, A., 1997. "Preferential trading and the myth of natural trading partners," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 471-489, December.
    4. Feng, Wei & Sun, Shujun & Yuan, Hang, 2023. "Research on the efficiency of factor allocation in the pilot free trade zones," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 727-745.
    5. Jagdambe, Subhash & Kannan, Elumalai, 2020. "Effects of ASEAN-India Free Trade Agreement on agricultural trade: The gravity model approach," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    6. Florentina Chirodea & Luminita Soproni & Mihai Marian, 2023. "European Union Tools for the Sustainable Development of Border Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Maskus, Keith E., 1997. "Should core labor standards be imposed through international trade policy?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1817, The World Bank.
    8. Winters, L. Alan, 1996. "Regionalism versus Multilateralism," CEPR Discussion Papers 1525, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Branko Milanović, 2001. "Nations, Conglomerates and Empires: Trade-off Between Income and Sovereignty," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Dominick Salvatore & Marjan Svetličič & Jože P. Damijan (ed.), Small Countries in a Global Economy, chapter 1, pages 25-69, Palgrave Macmillan.
    10. Carol Newman & John Page, 2017. "Industrial clusters: The case for Special Economic Zones in Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series 015, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Anne O. Krueger, 1999. "Are Preferential Trading Arrangements Trade-Liberalizing or Protectionist?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 105-124, Fall.
    12. Michaely, Michael, 1998. "Partners to a preferential trade agreement: Implications of varying size," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 73-85, October.
    13. Distefano, Tiziano & Chiarotti, Guido & Laio, Francesco & Ridolfi, Luca, 2019. "Spatial Distribution of the International Food Prices: Unexpected Heterogeneity and Randomness," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 122-132.
    14. David Tsirekidze, 2021. "Global supply chains, trade agreements and rules of origin," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(11), pages 3111-3140, November.
    15. Peter H. Egger & Michael Pfaffermayr, 2013. "The Pure Effects of European Integration on Intra-EU Core and Periphery Trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 701-712, June.
    16. Kholekile L. Gwebu & Jeffrey Sohl & Jing Wang, 2019. "Differential performance of science park firms: an integrative model," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 193-211, January.
    17. Kyle Bagwell & Robert W. Staiger, 1999. "Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Bilateral Opportunism and the Rules of GATT," NBER Working Papers 7071, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Browne, William P. & Schweikhardt, David B. & Bonnen, James T., 2000. "Chance Governs All: The Fragmented, Frustating State Of Agricultural Trade Policy In The United States," Staff Paper Series 11769, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    19. HUBERT Marie-Hélène & MOREAUX Michel, 2007. "The challenge of meeting the future food needs," LERNA Working Papers 07.17.238, LERNA, University of Toulouse.
    20. Kyle Bagwell & Robert W. Staiger, 1993. "Multilateral Tarriff Cooperation During the Formation of Regional Free Trade Areas," NBER Working Papers 4364, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:6-:d:315885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.