IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2370-d1050087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land-Use Planning Serves as a Critical Tool for Improving Resources and Environmental Carrying Capacity: A Review of Evaluation Methods and Application

Author

Listed:
  • An Huang

    (School of Public Administration, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
    School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Li Tian

    (School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Innovation Center for Smart Human Settlements and Spatial Planning & Governance, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100084, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Qing Li

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Yongfu Li

    (Shanghai Academy of Fine Arts, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Jianghao Yu

    (School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Yuan Gao

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jing Xia

    (College of Architecture & Art, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

Abstract

Research on resources and environmental carrying capacity (RECC) has been expanding since the early 20th century, and RECC has become a global concern and criterion for measuring regional sustainable development. Land-use planning (LUP) serves as a key tool of socioeconomic–ecological coordinated development and is deeply associated with RECC. In China, the newly established spatial planning system of 2019 identifies RECC assessment as the basis for spatial planning. However, after systematically reviewing the research history, conceptual evolution, and evaluation methods of RECC, we found that the existing approach of RECC has not addressed the impacts of stakeholders’ behavior on RECC, in other words, the governance perspective has not been sufficiently discussed. Further, research on the interaction between RECC and LUP has been far from sufficient, hampering our deep understanding of the roles of LUP in improving RECC. In order to fill this gap, a new framework is proposed to explain the formation mechanism of RECC combining the governance considerations based on the social–ecological system (SES) framework, which has made contributions to enrich the research perspective of RECC and its theoretical and methods system. In addition, the interaction path between RECC and LUP is constructed according to the new RECC framework and a policy toolbox for improving RECC, which will provide a comprehensive and systematic practical application path for improving RECC and promoting regional socioeconomic–ecological coordinated sustainable development. The conclusion part discusses the future research topics and limitations for RECC and LUP.

Suggested Citation

  • An Huang & Li Tian & Qing Li & Yongfu Li & Jianghao Yu & Yuan Gao & Jing Xia, 2023. "Land-Use Planning Serves as a Critical Tool for Improving Resources and Environmental Carrying Capacity: A Review of Evaluation Methods and Application," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2370-:d:1050087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2370/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2370/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Pei & Lin, Borong & Zhou, Hao & Wu, Xiaoying & Little, John C., 2020. "CO2 emissions from urban buildings at the city scale: System dynamic projections and potential mitigation policies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Marc L. Imhoff & Lahouari Bounoua & Taylor Ricketts & Colby Loucks & Robert Harriss & William T. Lawrence, 2004. "Global patterns in human consumption of net primary production," Nature, Nature, vol. 429(6994), pages 870-873, June.
    3. Li Tian & Gaofeng Xu & Chenjing Fan & Yue Zhang & Chaolin Gu & Yang Zhang, 2019. "Analyzing Mega City-Regions through Integrating Urbanization and Eco-Environment Systems: A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Dong Yang & Mengyuan Dang & Lingwen Sun & Feng Han & Feng Shi & Hongbo Zhang & Hongjun Zhang, 2021. "A System Dynamics Model for Urban Residential Building Stock towards Sustainability: The Case of Jinan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Junfeng Yang & Kun Lei & Soonthiam Khu & Wei Meng, 2015. "Assessment of Water Resources Carrying Capacity for Sustainable Development Based on a System Dynamics Model: A Case Study of Tieling City, China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(3), pages 885-899, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suizi Wang & Jiangwen Fan & Haiyan Zhang & Yaxian Zhang & Huajun Fang, 2023. "Harmonizing Population, Grain, and Land: Unlocking Sustainable Land Resource Management in the Farming–Pastoral Ecotone," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yanjie & Pan, Ying & Li, Meng & Wang, Zhipeng & Wu, Junxi & Zhang, Xianzhou & Cao, Yanan, 2021. "Impacts of human appropriation of net primary production on ecosystem regulating services in Tibet," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    2. Yutong Tian & Chunhui Li & Yujun Yi & Xuan Wang & Anping Shu, 2020. "Dynamic Model of a Sustainable Water Resources Utilization System with Coupled Water Quality and Quantity in Tianjin City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Martínez-Alier, Joan & Pascual, Unai & Vivien, Franck-Dominique & Zaccai, Edwin, 2010. "Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1741-1747, July.
    4. Huo, Tengfei & Du, Qianxi & Xu, Linbo & Shi, Qingwei & Cong, Xiaobo & Cai, Weiguang, 2023. "Timetable and roadmap for achieving carbon peak and carbon neutrality of China's building sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    5. Beatrice Asenso Barnieh & Li Jia & Massimo Menenti & Min Jiang & Jie Zhou & Yelong Zeng & Ali Bennour, 2021. "Modeling the Underlying Drivers of Natural Vegetation Occurrence in West Africa with Binary Logistic Regression Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-37, April.
    6. Pritchard, Rose & Ryan, Casey M. & Grundy, Isla & van der Horst, Dan, 2018. "Human Appropriation of Net Primary Productivity and Rural Livelihoods: Findings From Six Villages in Zimbabwe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 115-124.
    7. Hermann, Weston A., 2006. "Quantifying global exergy resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1685-1702.
    8. Esther Barrios-Crespo & Saúl Torres-Ortega & Pedro Díaz-Simal, 2021. "Developing a Dynamic Model for Assessing Green Infrastructure Investments in Urban Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Erb, Karl-Heinz & Krausmann, Fridolin & Lucht, Wolfgang & Haberl, Helmut, 2009. "Embodied HANPP: Mapping the spatial disconnect between global biomass production and consumption," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 328-334, December.
    10. Zaiyu Fan & Zhen Zhong, 2023. "Spatial Morphological Characteristics and Evolution of Policy-Oriented Urban Agglomerations—Take the Yangtze River Middle Reaches Urban Agglomeration as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Murphy, Sinnott & Pincetl, Stephanie, 2013. "Zero waste in Los Angeles: Is the emperor wearing any clothes?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 40-51.
    12. Lauk, Christian & Erb, Karl-Heinz, 2009. "Biomass consumed in anthropogenic vegetation fires: Global patterns and processes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 301-309, December.
    13. Jingjing Liu & Jing Wang & Tianlin Zhai & Zehui Li, 2022. "The Response of Ecologically Functional Land to Changes in Urban Economic Growth and Transportation Construction in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Andrew J. Wiltshire & Gillian Kay & Jemma L. Gornall & Richard A. Betts, 2013. "The Impact of Climate, CO 2 and Population on Regional Food and Water Resources in the 2050s," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Wahhaj Ahmed & Ayman Alazazmeh & Muhammad Asif, 2022. "Energy and Water Saving Potential in Commercial Buildings: A Retrofit Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Qianjin Dong & Xu Zhang & Yalin Chen & Debin Fang, 2019. "Dynamic Management of a Water Resources-Socioeconomic-Environmental System Based on Feedbacks Using System Dynamics," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(6), pages 2093-2108, April.
    17. Luiz Maurício Furtado Maués & Felipe de Sá Moreira & Luciana de Nazaré Pinheiro Cordeiro & Raísse Layane de Paula Saraiva & Paulo Cerqueira dos Santos Junior & Olga Maria Pinheiro Pinheiro, 2022. "Impact on Education and Ecological Footprint as a Consequence of SARS-CoV-2 in the Perception of the Quality of Teaching Engineering Students in the Brazilian Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    18. de Boer, Joop & Helms, Martine & Aiking, Harry, 2006. "Protein consumption and sustainability: Diet diversity in EU-15," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 267-274, September.
    19. Chao Bao & Dongmei He, 2019. "Scenario Modeling of Urbanization Development and Water Scarcity Based on System Dynamics: A Case Study of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Krausmann, Fridolin & Erb, Karl-Heinz & Gingrich, Simone & Lauk, Christian & Haberl, Helmut, 2008. "Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: A comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 471-487, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2370-:d:1050087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.