IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i17p10930-d904263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Driving Factors of Remote Sensing Ecological Index Changes from the Perspective of Geospatial Differentiation: A Case Study of the Weihe River Basin, China

Author

Listed:
  • Kaili Zhang

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Rongrong Feng

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Zhicheng Zhang

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Chun Deng

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Hongjuan Zhang

    (Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development & Collaborative Innovation Center on Yellow River Civilization Jointly Built by Henan Province and Ministry of Education, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China)

  • Kang Liu

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
    National Forestry and Grassland Administration Urban Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Xi’an 710127, China)

Abstract

Using the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform, Moderate-resolution image spectroradiometer (MODIS) data of the Weihe River Basin from 2001 to 2021 were acquired, four ecological indicators, namely, greenness, wetness, heat, and dryness, were extracted, and the remote sensing ecological index (RSEI) was constructed through principal component analysis. In addition, the geographic detectors and a multi-scale geographic weighted regression model (MGWR) were used to identify the main driving factors of RSEI changes and capture the differences in spatial changes from different perspectives using multiple indicators. The results show that (1) the quality of the eco-environment in the Weihe River basin improved as a whole from 2001 to 2021, and the RSEI increased from 0.376 to 0.414. In terms of the RSEI grade, the medium RSEI and high RSEI areas increased significantly and the growth rate increased significantly, reaching 26.42% and 27.70%, respectively. (2) Spatially, the quality of the eco-environment in the Weihe River Basin exhibited a spatial distribution pattern that was high in the south and low in the north, among which the quality of the eco-environment in the Weihe River Basin in northern Shaanxi and northwestern Ningxia and Gansu was relatively low. In addition, during the study period, the RSEI of the Qinling Mountains in the southern part of the Weihe River Basin and the Jinghe River and Luohe River areas improved significantly. The urban area on the Guanzhong Plain in the Weihe River Basin experienced rapid economic growth, and urban expansion led to a significant decrease in the quality of the eco-environment. (3) The eco-environment quality in the Weihe River Basin is the result of the interaction of natural, anthropogenic, and landscape pattern factors. All of the interactions between the influencing factors had a stronger influence than those of the individual factors. There were significant differences between the individual drivers and the spatial variation in RSEI, suggesting that different factors dominate the variation in RSEI in different regions, and zonal management is crucial to achieving sustainable management of RSEI. The study shows that to improve the eco-environment quality of the Weihe River Basin, it is necessary to further strengthen ecological protection projects, reasonably allocate landscape elements, and strengthen the resistance and resilience of the ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaili Zhang & Rongrong Feng & Zhicheng Zhang & Chun Deng & Hongjuan Zhang & Kang Liu, 2022. "Exploring the Driving Factors of Remote Sensing Ecological Index Changes from the Perspective of Geospatial Differentiation: A Case Study of the Weihe River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10930-:d:904263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10930/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10930/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grossman, G.M & Krueger, A.B., 1991. "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement," Papers 158, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Public and International Affairs.
    2. Ekpeno L. Effiong, 2018. "On the urbanization-pollution nexus in Africa: a semiparametric analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 445-456, January.
    3. Seyed Banimahd & Davar Khalili, 2013. "Factors Influencing Markov Chains Predictability Characteristics, Utilizing SPI, RDI, EDI and SPEI Drought Indices in Different Climatic Zones," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(11), pages 3911-3928, September.
    4. Guo, Beibei & Fang, Yelin & Jin, Xiaobin & zhou, Yinkang, 2020. "Monitoring the effects of land consolidation on the ecological environmental quality based on remote sensing: A case study of Chaohu Lake Basin, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Subhasis Das & Biswajeet Pradhan & Pravat Kumar Shit & Abdullah M. Alamri, 2020. "Assessment of Wetland Ecosystem Health Using the Pressure–State–Response (PSR) Model: A Case Study of Mursidabad District of West Bengal (India)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Junnan Xiong & Wei Li & Hao Zhang & Weiming Cheng & Chongchong Ye & Yunliang Zhao, 2019. "Selected Environmental Assessment Model and Spatial Analysis Method to Explain Correlations in Environmental and Socio-Economic Data with Possible Application for Explaining the State of the Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-26, September.
    7. Wang, Bing & Gao, Peng & Niu, Xiang & Sun, Jianni, 2017. "Policy-driven China’s Grain to Green Program: Implications for ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 38-47.
    8. Pengwen Gao & Alimujiang Kasimu & Yongyu Zhao & Bing Lin & Jinpeng Chai & Tuersunayi Ruzi & Hemiao Zhao, 2020. "Evaluation of the Temporal and Spatial Changes of Ecological Quality in the Hami Oasis Based on RSEI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    9. A. Stewart Fotheringham & Wenbai Yang & Wei Kang, 2017. "Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR)," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(6), pages 1247-1265, November.
    10. Kaili Zhang & Tan Liu & Rongrong Feng & Zhicheng Zhang & Kang Liu, 2021. "Coupling Coordination Relationship and Driving Mechanism between Urbanization and Ecosystem Service Value in Large Regions: A Case Study of Urban Agglomeration in Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-26, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xueman Zuo & Jiazheng Li & Ludan Zhang & Zhilong Wu & Sen Lin & Xisheng Hu, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Variations in Ecological Quality and Its Response to Topography and Road Network Based on GEE: Taking the Minjiang River Basin as a Case," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tongning Li & Daozheng Li & Diling Liang & Simin Huang, 2022. "Coupling Coordination Degree of Ecological-Economic and Its Influencing Factors in the Counties of Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Shahnazi, Rouhollah & Dehghan Shabani, Zahra, 2021. "The effects of renewable energy, spatial spillover of CO2 emissions and economic freedom on CO2 emissions in the EU," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 293-307.
    3. Liang Geng & Xinyue Zhao & Yu An & Lingtong Peng & Dan Ye, 2022. "Study on the Spatial Interaction between Urban Economic and Ecological Environment—A Case Study of Wuhan City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Shen, Neng & Peng, Hui, 2021. "Can industrial agglomeration achieve the emission-reduction effect?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    5. Hui Yang & Liang Zheng & Ying Wang & Jiangfeng Li & Bowen Zhang & Yuzhe Bi, 2022. "Quantifying the Relationship between Land Use Intensity and Ecosystem Services’ Value in the Hanjiang River Basin: A Case Study of the Hubei Section," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Meili Tang & Jia’ni Ding & Haojia Kong & Brandon J. Bethel & Decai Tang, 2022. "Influence of Green Finance on Ecological Environment Quality in Yangtze River Delta," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, August.
    7. Nasreen, Samia & Anwar, Sofia & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2017. "Financial stability, energy consumption and environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian economies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1105-1122.
    8. Song, Tao & Zheng, Tingguo & Tong, Lianjun, 2008. "An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: A panel cointegration approach," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 381-392, September.
    9. Giedrė Lapinskienė & Kęstutis Peleckis & Neringa Slavinskaitė, 2017. "Energy consumption, economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union countries," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 1082-1097, November.
    10. Emrah Kocak & Hayriye Hilal Baglitas, 2022. "The path to sustainable municipal solid waste management: Do human development, energy efficiency, and income inequality matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1947-1962, December.
    11. Jose Mendez & Lewis Gale, "undated". "A Note on the Empirical Relationship Between Trade, Growth and the Environment," Working Papers 2132836, Department of Economics, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University.
    12. Jingwen Lu & Lihua Dai, 2023. "Examining the Threshold Effect of Environmental Regulation: The Impact of Agricultural Product Trade Openness on Agricultural Carbon Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Löschel, Andreas & Pothen, Frank & Schymura, Michael, 2015. "Peeling the onion: Analyzing aggregate, national and sectoral energy intensity in the European Union," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(S1), pages 63-75.
    14. Jikun Jiang & Shenglai Zhu & Weihao Wang, 2022. "Carbon Emissions, Economic Growth, Urbanization, and Foreign Trade in China: Empirical Evidence from ARDL Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Bradford David F. & Fender Rebecca A & Shore Stephen H. & Wagner Martin, 2005. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Exploring a Fresh Specification," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-30, June.
    16. Yanzhao Wang & Jianfei Cao, 2023. "Examining the Effects of Socioeconomic Development on Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) in China’s Cities Based on Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis and MGWR Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-23, February.
    17. Ruqayya Ibraheem & Ismat Nasim, 2021. "Globalization, Energy Use and Environmental Degradation in Thailand," iRASD Journal of Energy and Environment, International Research Association for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 2(1), pages 01-11, June.
    18. Wang, Zheng-Xin & Jv, Yue-Qi, 2021. "A non-linear systematic grey model for forecasting the industrial economy-energy-environment system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    19. Yao Zhao & Xuena Kong & Mahmood Ahmad & Zahoor Ahmed, 2023. "Digital Economy, Industrial Structure, and Environmental Quality: Assessing the Roles of Educational Investment, Green Innovation, and Economic Globalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    20. Coxhead, Ian A. & Jayasuriya, Sisira, 2003. "Trade, Liberalization, Resource Degradation and Industrial Pollution in Developing Countries: An Integrated Analysis," Staff Papers 12691, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10930-:d:904263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.