IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i11p6552-d825906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the Impact of Alternative Bus Stop Platforms on Vehicle Emissions and Individual Pollution Exposure at Bus Stops

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Yu

    (College of Transportation Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Management, Control and Cycle Repair Technology for Traffic Network Facilities in Ecological Security Barrier Area, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Lili Lu

    (Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Tiezhu Li

    (Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Nanjing 211189, China
    School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Ran Tu

    (Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Nanjing 211189, China
    School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

Abstract

Due to stop-and-go events, bus stops are often treated as “hot spots” for air pollution. The design of bus stops should be optimized to reduce emissions and exposure for transit commuters. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of bus stop platform types on vehicle emissions and individual pollution exposure. Second-by-second emissions data were first collected from one bus using a portable emission measurement system (PEMS). Microscopic traffic simulation was then used to estimate overall traffic emissions under six scenarios with different bus stop settings. Numerical simulation of pollutant dispersion was also conducted to calculate individual pollution exposure at bus stops. The results of PEMS tests showed no significant differences between bus emissions generated near two different types of stops. However, the effect of platform types on overall traffic emissions was revealed using traffic simulation. The results demonstrated that bus bays reduced the emissions of other heavy-duty vehicles. However, bus bays were not always effective during rush hours. The study also highlighted the importance of the location of bus stops, the number of bus lines, and the length of the platform, in addition to dynamic characteristics of traffic flows in the design of bus stop platforms. Bus stop platforms also affected individuals’ exposure due to the changes in the pollutant flow field. The passenger’s exposure at one bus stop was influenced by both the platform type and standing location. Results suggested that in a condition with a wind direction perpendicular to the bus stop shelter, the total exposure level to CO was lower at the bus bay stop if a passenger stood at the upstream of the station platform. However, the exposure was less at the downstream of the curbside bus stop.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Yu & Lili Lu & Tiezhu Li & Ran Tu, 2022. "Quantifying the Impact of Alternative Bus Stop Platforms on Vehicle Emissions and Individual Pollution Exposure at Bus Stops," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6552-:d:825906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6552/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6552/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pan, Yingjiu & Chen, Shuyan & Li, Tiezhu & Niu, Shifeng & Tang, Kun, 2019. "Exploring spatial variation of the bus stop influence zone with multi-source data: A case study in Zhenjiang, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 166-177.
    2. Rosero, Fredy & Fonseca, Natalia & López, José-María & Casanova, Jesús, 2021. "Effects of passenger load, road grade, and congestion level on real-world fuel consumption and emissions from compressed natural gas and diesel urban buses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PB).
    3. Tirachini, Alejandro, 2014. "The economics and engineering of bus stops: Spacing, design and congestion," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 37-57.
    4. Xumei Chen & Xiaomi Han & Lei Yu & Changhai Wei, 2017. "Does Operation Scheduling Make a Difference: Tapping the Potential of Optimized Design for Skipping-Stop Strategy in Reducing Bus Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Ibarra-Rojas, O.J. & Delgado, F. & Giesen, R. & Muñoz, J.C., 2015. "Planning, operation, and control of bus transport systems: A literature review," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 38-75.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maksymilian Mądziel, 2023. "Vehicle Emission Models and Traffic Simulators: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-31, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Proboste, Francisco & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Gschwender, Antonio, 2020. "Comparing social costs of public transport networks structured around an Open and Closed BRT corridor in medium sized cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 187-212.
    2. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    3. John HE Taplin & Yuchao Sun, 2020. "Optimizing bus stop locations for walking access: Stops-first design of a feeder route to enhance a residential plan," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(7), pages 1237-1259, September.
    4. Daniel Hörcher & Daniel J. Graham, 2021. "The Gini index of demand imbalances in public transport," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2521-2544, October.
    5. Zhou, Yu & Meng, Qiang & Ong, Ghim Ping, 2022. "Electric Bus Charging Scheduling for a Single Public Transport Route Considering Nonlinear Charging Profile and Battery Degradation Effect," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 49-75.
    6. Xu, Zhandong & Xie, Jun & Liu, Xiaobo & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2020. "Hyperpath-based algorithms for the transit equilibrium assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    7. Sánchez-Martínez, G.E. & Koutsopoulos, H.N. & Wilson, N.H.M., 2016. "Real-time holding control for high-frequency transit with dynamics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-19.
    8. Wu, Weitiao & Liu, Ronghui & Jin, Wenzhou & Ma, Changxi, 2019. "Stochastic bus schedule coordination considering demand assignment and rerouting of passengers," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 275-303.
    9. Börjesson, Maria & Fung, Chau Man & Proost, Stef & Yan, Zifei, 2018. "Do buses hinder cyclists or is it the other way around? Optimal bus fares, bus stops and cycling tolls," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 326-346.
    10. Dessouky, Maged M & Hu, Shichun, 2021. "Dynamic Routing for Ride-Sharing," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6qq8r7hz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    11. Zhang, Wei & (Ato) Xu, Wangtu, 2017. "Simulation-based robust optimization for the schedule of single-direction bus transit route: The design of experiment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 203-230.
    12. Kulkarni, Sarang & Krishnamoorthy, Mohan & Ranade, Abhiram & Ernst, Andreas T. & Patil, Rahul, 2018. "A new formulation and a column generation-based heuristic for the multiple depot vehicle scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 457-487.
    13. Moccia, Luigi & Laporte, Gilbert, 2016. "Improved models for technology choice in a transit corridor with fixed demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 245-270.
    14. Bixuan Sun & Jeffrey Apland, 2019. "Operational planning of public transit with economic and environmental goals: application to the Minneapolis–St. Paul bus system," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 237-267, August.
    15. David Canca & Belén Navarro-Carmona & Gabriel Villa & Alejandro Zarzo, 2023. "A Multilayer Network Approach for the Bimodal Bus–Pedestrian Line Planning Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-36, October.
    16. Perumal, Shyam S.G. & Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper, 2022. "Electric bus planning & scheduling: A review of related problems and methodologies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 395-413.
    17. Börjesson, Maria & Fung, Chau Man & Proost, Stef & Yan, Zifei, 2017. "Cycling tolls and optimal number of bus stops: the importance of congestion and crowding," Working papers in Transport Economics 2017:10, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    18. Wu, Weitiao & Liu, Ronghui & Jin, Wenzhou, 2016. "Designing robust schedule coordination scheme for transit networks with safety control margins," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 495-519.
    19. He, Yi & Liu, Zhaocai & Song, Ziqi, 2020. "Optimal charging scheduling and management for a fast-charging battery electric bus system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    20. Xingchen Yan & Tao Wang & Jun Chen & Xiaofei Ye & Zhen Yang & Hua Bai, 2019. "Analysis of the Characteristics and Number of Bicycle–Passenger Conflicts at Bus Stops for Improving Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6552-:d:825906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.