IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10435-d649623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neighborhood and Child Development at Age Five: A UK–US Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Buttaro

    (Independent Researcher, San Francisco, CA 94102, USA)

  • Ludovica Gambaro

    (Department of Sociology, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany)

  • Heather Joshi

    (Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, UK)

  • Mary Clare Lennon

    (Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10016, USA)

Abstract

Early childhood is a critical period in the life course, setting the foundation for future life. Early life contexts—neighborhoods and families—influence developmental outcomes, especially when children are exposed to economic and social disadvantage. Residential mobility, frequent among families with pre-school children, may reduce or increase exposure to adverse surroundings. We examine children’s cognitive and behavioral outcomes at age five, in relation to neighborhood composition, family circumstances and residential moves, using two longitudinal micro datasets: an urban subsample of the UK Millennium Cohort Study (N up to 7967), and the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study in the US (N up to 1820). Each is linked to an index of neighborhood advantage, created to make UK/US comparisons, based on census and administrative information. A series of estimates indicate a strong association, in both countries, between cognitive scores and neighborhood advantage, attenuated but not eliminated by family circumstances. Children’s behavior problems, on the other hand, show less association with neighborhood advantage. There are minor and mixed differences by residential mobility particularly when neighborhood disadvantage changes. Notwithstanding the primacy of the family in predicting preschool development, the findings support the notion of neighborhood as potentially advantageous at least in relation to cognitive outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Buttaro & Ludovica Gambaro & Heather Joshi & Mary Clare Lennon, 2021. "Neighborhood and Child Development at Age Five: A UK–US Comparison," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10435-:d:649623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10435/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10435/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth M. Lawrence & Elisabeth Root & Stefanie Mollborn, 2015. "Residential mobility in early childhood," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(32), pages 939-950.
    2. Leon Feinstein, 2003. "Inequality in the Early Cognitive Development of British Children in the 1970 Cohort," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 70(277), pages 73-97, February.
    3. Ruth Lupton, 2003. "'Neighbourhood Effects': Can we measure them and does it matter?," CASE Papers 073, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    4. Ruth Lupton, 2003. "Neighbourhood Effects: Can we measure them and does it matter?," CASE Papers case73, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    5. Hill Kulu & Fiona Steele, 2013. "Interrelationships Between Childbearing and Housing Transitions in the Family Life Course," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(5), pages 1687-1714, October.
    6. Leventhal, T. & Brooks-Gunn, J., 2003. "Moving to Oppurtunity: An Experimental Study of Neighborhood Effects on Mental Health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1576-1582.
    7. Maarten van Ham & David Manley, 2012. "Neighbourhood Effects Research at a Crossroads. Ten Challenges for Future Research Introduction," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(12), pages 2787-2793, December.
    8. Reichman, Nancy E. & Teitler, Julien O. & Garfinkel, Irwin & McLanahan, Sara S., 2001. "Fragile Families: sample and design," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4-5), pages 303-326.
    9. Maarten van Ham & David Manley, 2012. "Neighbourhood Effects Research at a Crossroads: Ten Challenges for Future Research," RatSWD Working Papers 204, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    10. Raj Chetty & Nathaniel Hendren & Lawrence F. Katz, 2016. "The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(4), pages 855-902, April.
    11. Flowerdew, Robin & Manley, David J. & Sabel, Clive E., 2008. "Neighbourhood effects on health: Does it matter where you draw the boundaries?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(6), pages 1241-1255, March.
    12. Martens, P.J. & Chateau, D.G. & Burland, E.M.J. & Finlayson, G.S. & Smith, M.J. & Taylor, C.R. & Brownell, M.D. & Nickel, N.C. & Katz, A. & Bolton, J.M. & Burchill, C. & Chartier, M. & Doupe, M. & Fra, 2014. "The effect of neighborhood socioeconomic status on education and health outcomes for children living in social housing," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(11), pages 2103-2113.
    13. Edwards, Benjamin & Bromfield, Leah M., 2009. "Neighborhood influences on young children's conduct problems and pro-social behavior: Evidence from an Australian national sample," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 317-324, March.
    14. Root, E.D. & Humphrey, J.L., 2014. "The impact of childhood mobility on exposure to neighborhood socioeconomic context over time," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(1), pages 80-82.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bert Provan, 2022. "CASE Annual Report 2021," CASE Reports casereport142, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gundi Knies & Patricia C Melo & Min Zhang, 2021. "Neighbourhood deprivation, life satisfaction and earnings: Comparative analyses of neighbourhood effects at bespoke scales," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(13), pages 2640-2659, October.
    2. Stanley, John K. & Hensher, David A. & Stanley, Janet R., 2022. "Place-based disadvantage, social exclusion and the value of mobility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 101-113.
    3. Miguel Serra & Sophia Psarra & Jamie O'Brien, 2018. "Social and Physical Characterization of Urban Contexts: Techniques and Methods for Quantification, Classification and Purposive Sampling," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 58-74.
    4. Petrović, Ana & Manley, David & van Ham, Maarten, 2018. "Freedom from the Tyranny of Neighbourhood: Rethinking Socio-Spatial Context Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 11416, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Stefanie Mollborn & Elizabeth Lawrence & Elisabeth Dowling Root, 2018. "Residential Mobility Across Early Childhood and Children’s Kindergarten Readiness," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(2), pages 485-510, April.
    6. Eleonore M Veldhuizen & Karien Stronks & Anton E Kunst, 2013. "Assessing Associations between Socio-Economic Environment and Self-Reported Health in Amsterdam Using Bespoke Environments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-10, July.
    7. Nieuwenhuis, Jaap & van Ham, Maarten & Yu, Rongqin & Branje, Susan & Meeus, Wim & Hooimeijer, Pieter, 2016. "Being Poorer than the Rest of the Neighbourhood: Relative Deprivation and Problem Behaviour of Youth," IZA Discussion Papers 10220, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Kati Kadarik & Emily Miltenburg & Sako Musterd & John Östh, 2021. "Country-of-origin-specific economic capital in neighbourhoods: Impact on immigrants’ employment opportunities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(5), pages 1201-1218, August.
    9. Martin Gächter & Engelbert Theurl, 2010. "Convergence of the Health Status at the Local Level: Empirical Evidence from Austria," NRN working papers 2010-09, The Austrian Center for Labor Economics and the Analysis of the Welfare State, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    10. Julie Vallée & Guillaume Le Roux & Basile Chaix & Yan Kestens & Pierre Chauvin, 2015. "The ‘constant size neighbourhood trap’ in accessibility and health studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(2), pages 338-357, February.
    11. Yongxin Deng, 2016. "Challenges and complications in neighborhood mapping: from neighborhood concept to operationalization," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 229-248, July.
    12. Plane, Jocelyn & Klodawsky, Fran, 2013. "Neighbourhood amenities and health: Examining the significance of a local park," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-8.
    13. Agata Górny & Sabina Toruńczyk-Ruiz, 2015. "Relative deprivation and ‘the diversity effect’ in explaining neighbourhood attachment: Alternative or complementary mechanisms?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(5), pages 984-990, April.
    14. Heike Hanhörster & Susanne Wessendorf, 2020. "The Role of Arrival Areas for Migrant Integration and Resource Access," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 1-10.
    15. Caitlin Robinson & Stefan Bouzarovski & Sarah Lindley, 2018. "Underrepresenting neighbourhood vulnerabilities? The measurement of fuel poverty in England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(5), pages 1109-1127, August.
    16. Zwiers, Merle & Kleinhans, Reinout & van Ham, Maarten, 2015. "Divided Cities: Increasing Socio-Spatial Polarization within Large Cities in the Netherlands," IZA Discussion Papers 8882, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Mia Arp Fallov, 2010. "Community Capacity Building as the Route to Inclusion in Neighbourhood Regeneration?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 789-804, December.
    18. Elspeth Graham & David Manley & Rosemary Hiscock & Paul Boyle & Joe Doherty, 2009. "Mixing Housing Tenures: Is it Good for Social Well-being?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(1), pages 139-165, January.
    19. Alex Hirschfield & Mark Birkin & Chris Brunsdon & Nicolas Malleson & Andrew Newton, 2014. "How Places Influence Crime: The Impact of Surrounding Areas on Neighbourhood Burglary Rates in a British City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(5), pages 1057-1072, April.
    20. Emily M Miltenburg & Tom WG van der Meer, 2018. "Lingering neighbourhood effects: A framework to account for residential histories and temporal dynamics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(1), pages 151-174, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10435-:d:649623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.