IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i18p9930-d640079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Exploration of Domain-Specific Sedentary Behaviors in College Students by Lifestyle Factors and Sociodemographics

Author

Listed:
  • Chelsea Carpenter

    (Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA)

  • Sang-Eun Byun

    (Department of Retailing, College of Hospitality, Retail and Sport Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

  • Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy

    (Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

  • Delia West

    (Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

Abstract

College students exhibit high levels of sedentary time and/or poor lifestyle factors (e.g., poor sleep, stress, physical inactivity). It is unknown; however, in what domains college students spend their sedentary time and whether there are associations between sedentary time and these lifestyle factors. This study examined sedentary behavior of college students by domains, current lifestyle factors and sociodemographics. Undergraduates (n = 272, M age = 20 years, 79% female) self-reported their sedentary behavior, sleep, stress, physical activity, anthropometrics and sociodemographics. Sedentary time was categorized as: total, recreational screen, education and social. Students reported spending > 12 h of their day sedentary on average, with over a third of this time spent in recreational screen time. All categories of sedentary time were significantly correlated with body mass index, and both total sedentary time and screen time were significantly correlated with sleep score, with poorer sleep quality associated with greater sedentary time. Physical activity was negatively correlated with social sedentary time only. Subgroups with elevated sedentary time included minority students, those with low parental education and students with overweight/obesity. Given the negative health impacts of sedentary behavior, college students would likely benefit from interventions tailored to this population which target reducing sedentary time, particularly recreational screen time.

Suggested Citation

  • Chelsea Carpenter & Sang-Eun Byun & Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy & Delia West, 2021. "An Exploration of Domain-Specific Sedentary Behaviors in College Students by Lifestyle Factors and Sociodemographics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9930-:d:640079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9930/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9930/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ernest T. Pascarella & Christopher T. Pierson & Gregory C. Wolniak & Patrick T. Terenzini, 2004. "First-Generation College Students," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(3), pages 249-284, May.
    2. Sarah S Cohen & Charles E Matthews & Lisa B Signorello & David G Schlundt & William J Blot & Maciej S Buchowski, 2013. "Sedentary and Physically Active Behavior Patterns Among Low-Income African-American and White Adults Living in the Southeastern United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Lanae Joubert & Matthew Kilgas & Alexandrea Riley & Yuba Gautam & Lars Donath & Scott Drum, 2017. "In-Class Cycling to Augment College Student Academic Performance and Reduce Physical Inactivity: Results from an RCT," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-9, November.
    4. Matthew A Christensen & Laura Bettencourt & Leanne Kaye & Sai T Moturu & Kaylin T Nguyen & Jeffrey E Olgin & Mark J Pletcher & Gregory M Marcus, 2016. "Direct Measurements of Smartphone Screen-Time: Relationships with Demographics and Sleep," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Matthew S. Chrisman & Robert Wright & William Purdy, 2021. "College Classroom Instructors Can Effectively Promote Standing among Students Provided with Standing Desks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eduardo Melguizo-Ibáñez & Félix Zurita-Ortega & José Luis Ubago-Jiménez & Pilar Puertas-Molero & Gabriel González-Valero, 2022. "Motivational Climate, Anxiety and Physical Self-Concept in Trainee Physical Education Teachers—An Explanatory Model Regarding Physical Activity Practice Time," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-13, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corina Nüesch & Jan-Niklas Kreppke & Annegret Mündermann & Lars Donath, 2018. "Effects of a Dynamic Chair on Chair Seat Motion and Trunk Muscle Activity during Office Tasks and Task Transitions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Sara Thomée, 2018. "Mobile Phone Use and Mental Health. A Review of the Research That Takes a Psychological Perspective on Exposure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Edwards, Rebecca & Gibson, Rachael & Harmon, Colm P. & Schurer, Stefanie, 2020. "First in Their Families at University: Can Non-cognitive Skills Compensate for Social Origin?," IZA Discussion Papers 13721, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Amez, Simon & Vujić, Sunčica & De Marez, Lieven & Baert, Stijn, 2019. "Smartphone Use and Academic Performance: First Evidence from Longitudinal Data," GLO Discussion Paper Series 438, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    5. Simon Amez & Stijn Baert, 2019. "Smartphone Use and Academic Performance: a Literature Review," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 19/982, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    6. Amez, Simon & Denecker, Floor & Ponnet, Koen & De Marez, Lieven & Baert, Stijn, 2021. "Mobile DNA and Sleep Quality," IZA Discussion Papers 14816, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Jara-Díaz, Sergio R. & Rosales-Salas, Jorge, 2020. "Time use: The role of sleep," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1-20.
    8. Edwards, Rebecca & Gibson, Rachael & Harmon, Colm & Schurer, Stefanie, 2022. "First-in-their-family students at university: Can non-cognitive skills compensate for social origin?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Mesmin Destin & Ryan C. Svoboda, 2018. "Costs on the Mind: The Influence of the Financial Burden of College on Academic Performance and Cognitive Functioning," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(3), pages 302-324, May.
    10. Barkley, Andrew P. & Boone, Kristina & Hollowat, Zelia Wiley, 2005. "Openness to Diversity and Challenge: Assessment of Undergraduate Attitudes and Experiences in the College of Agriculture at Kansas State University," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19299, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Jeffrey Prince & Shane Greenstein, 2021. "Mobile Internet usage and usage‐based pricing," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 760-783, November.
    12. Daniel Monsivais & Asim Ghosh & Kunal Bhattacharya & Robin I M Dunbar & Kimmo Kaski, 2017. "Tracking urban human activity from mobile phone calling patterns," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Fernando Furquim & Kristen M. Glasener & Meghan Oster & Brian P. McCall & Stephen L. DesJardins, 2017. "Navigating the Financial Aid Process: Borrowing Outcomes among First-Generation and Non-First-Generation Students," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 671(1), pages 69-91, May.
    14. Yu Par Khin & Yusuke Matsuyama & Takahiro Tabuchi & Takeo Fujiwara, 2021. "Association of Visual Display Terminal Usage with Self-Rated Health and Psychological Distress among Japanese Office Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-10, September.
    15. Ricardo Cunningham, 2016. "Student Response Systems (SRS) and the Performance of First-Generation Students Majoring in Business," Journal of Business, LAR Center Press, vol. 1(4), pages 1-12, September.
    16. Barkley, Andrew P. & Wiley, Zelia Z. & Hobbs, Lonnie Jr. & Smades, Summer, 2021. "Openness to Diversity and Challenge: Assessment of Undergraduate Attitudes and Experiences in The College of Agriculture at Kansas State University," Professional Agricultural Workers Journal (PAWJ), Professional Agricultural Workers Conference, vol. 8(1), October.
    17. Erik E. Morales, 2014. "Learning from Success: How Original Research on Academic Resilience Informs what College Faculty Can do to Increase the Retention of Low Socioeconomic Status Students," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(3), pages 1-92, August.
    18. Schwartz, Sarah E.O. & Kanchewa, Stella S. & Rhodes, Jean E. & Cutler, Evan & Cunningham, Jessica L., 2016. "“I didn't know you could just ask:” Empowering underrepresented college-bound students to recruit academic and career mentors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 51-59.
    19. Kostadin Kushlev & Matthew R Leitao, 2020. "The Effects of Smartphones on Well-Being: Theoretical Integration and Research Agenda," Papers 2005.09100, arXiv.org.
    20. Gregory C. Wolniak & Marjolein Muskens, 2021. "Undermatching and Noncognitive Development during the First Year of College: A Longitudinal Study of College Students in the Netherlands," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 62(6), pages 855-884, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9930-:d:640079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.