IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i12p1521-d121923.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building-Based Analysis of the Spatial Provision of Urban Parks in Shenzhen, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wenxiu Gao

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Nanhai Ave 3688, Shenzhen 518060, China
    Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Optimizing Design of Built Environment, Shenzhen University, Nanhai Ave 3688, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Qiang Lyu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Nanhai Ave 3688, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Xiang Fan

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Nanhai Ave 3688, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Xiaochun Yang

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Nanhai Ave 3688, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Jiangtao Liu

    (Urban Planning, Land and Resources Commission of Shenzhen Municipality, Shenzhen 518034, China)

  • Xirui Zhang

    (Urban Planning, Land and Resources Commission of Shenzhen Municipality, Shenzhen 518034, China)

Abstract

Urban parks provide important environmental, social, and economic benefits to people and urban areas. The literature demonstrates that proximity to urban parks is one of the key factors influencing people’s willingness to use them. Therefore, the provision of urban parks near residential areas and workplaces is one of the key factors influencing quality of life. This study designed a solution based on the spatial association between urban parks and buildings where people live or work to identify whether people in different buildings have nearby urban parks available for their daily lives. A building density map based on building floor area (BFA) was used to illustrate the spatial distribution of urban parks and five indices were designed to measure the scales, service coverage and potential service loads of urban parks and reveal areas lacking urban park services in an acceptable walking distance. With such solution, we investigated the provision of urban parks in ten districts of Shenzhen in China, which has grown from several small villages to a megacity in only 30 years. The results indicate that the spatial provision of urban parks in Shenzhen is not sufficient since people in about 65% of the buildings cannot access urban parks by walking 10-min. The distribution and service coverage of the existing urban parks is not balanced at the district level. In some districts, the existing urban parks have good numbers of potential users and even have large service loads, while in some districts, the building densities surrounding the existing parks are quite low and at the same time there is no urban parks nearby some high-density areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenxiu Gao & Qiang Lyu & Xiang Fan & Xiaochun Yang & Jiangtao Liu & Xirui Zhang, 2017. "Building-Based Analysis of the Spatial Provision of Urban Parks in Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:12:p:1521-:d:121923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/12/1521/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/12/1521/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barr, Jason & Cohen, Jeffrey P., 2014. "The floor area ratio gradient: New York City, 1890–2009," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 110-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Langjiao Li & Qingyun Du & Fu Ren & Xiangyuan Ma, 2019. "Assessing Spatial Accessibility to Hierarchical Urban Parks by Multi-Types of Travel Distance in Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qing Lu & Jing Ning & Hong You & Liyan Xu, 2023. "Urban Intensity in Theory and Practice: Empirical Determining Mechanism of Floor Area Ratio and Its Deviation from the Classic Location Theories in Beijing," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Zhang, Xingxing & Lovati, Marco & Vigna, Ilaria & Widén, Joakim & Han, Mengjie & Gal, Csilla & Feng, Tao, 2018. "A review of urban energy systems at building cluster level incorporating renewable-energy-source (RES) envelope solutions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1034-1056.
    3. Jeffrey P. Cohen & Robert G. Cromley & Kevin T. Banach, 2015. "Are Homes Near Water Bodies and Wetlands Worth More or Less? An Analysis of Housing Prices in One Connecticut Town," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 114-132, March.
    4. Mostafa Ghadami & Andreas Dittmann & Taher Safarrad, 2020. "Lack of Spatial Approach in Urban Density Policies: The Case of the Master Plan of Tehran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Jan K. Brueckner & Shihe Fu & Yizhen Gu & Junfu Zhang, 2017. "Measuring the Stringency of Land Use Regulation: The Case of China's Building Height Limits," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 99(4), pages 663-677, July.
    6. Jedwab, Remi & Barr, Jason & Brueckner, Jan K., 2022. "Cities Without Skylines: Worldwide Building-Height Gaps and their Possible Determinants and Implications," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    7. Vinci, Sabato & Bartolacci, Francesca & Salvia, Rosanna & Salvati, Luca, 2022. "Housing markets, the great crisis, and metropolitan gradients: Insights from Greece, 2000–2014," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. Walter D'Lima & Luis Arturo Lopez & Archana Pradhan, 2022. "COVID‐19 and housing market effects: Evidence from U.S. shutdown orders," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 50(2), pages 303-339, June.
    9. Fuess, Roland & Koller, Jan A. & Weigand, Alois, 2017. "Best Land Use with Negative Externalities: Determining Land Values from Residential Rents," Working Papers on Finance 1705, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance, revised May 2019.
    10. Jeffrey P. Cohen & Cletus C. Coughlin & Jonas C. Crews, 2017. "Airport Noise in Atlanta: The Inequality of Sound," Working Papers 2017-15, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    11. Roland Füss & Jan A. Koller & Alois Weigand, 2021. "Determining Land Values from Residential Rents," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-29, March.
    12. Moon, Byunggeor & Ahn, Sungin, 2022. "The effects of a FAR regulation in a model of durable building with redevelopment: The case of New York City," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    13. Jeffrey P. Cohen & Felix L. Friedt & Jackson P. Lautier, 2022. "The impact of the Coronavirus pandemic on New York City real estate: First evidence," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 858-888, June.
    14. Massimo Cecchini & Ilaria Zambon & Luca Salvati, 2019. "Housing and the City: A Spatial Analysis of Residential Building Activity and the Socio-Demographic Background in a Mediterranean City, 1990–2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, January.
    15. Ahlfeldt, Gabriel M. & Barr, Jason, 2022. "Viewing urban spatial history from tall buildings," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    16. Michael Wurm & Jan Goebel & Gert G Wagner & Matthias Weigand & Stefan Dech & Hannes Taubenböck, 2021. "Inferring floor area ratio thresholds for the delineation of city centers based on cognitive perception," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(2), pages 265-279, February.
    17. Gluszak, Michal & Zygmunt, Robert, 2018. "Development density, administrative decisions, and land values: An empirical investigation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 153-161.
    18. Brueckner, Jan K. & Singh, Ruchi, 2020. "Stringency of land-use regulation: Building heights in US cities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    19. Marco Zitti & Luca Salvati, 2017. "Recession and value of new dwellings: Changes in the spatial structure of Greece, 2003-2015," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 7(2), pages 1313-1313.
    20. Jonatan Almagor & Itzhak Benenson & Nurit Alfasi, 2018. "Assessing innovation: Dynamics of high-rise development in an Israeli city," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(2), pages 253-274, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:12:p:1521-:d:121923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.