IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i7p1666-d1367704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Underground Gas Storage in Saline Aquifers: Geological Aspects

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Uliasz-Misiak

    (Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, AGH University of Krakow, al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Jacek Misiak

    (Faculty of Geology, Geophysics, and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Krakow, al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Energy, gases, and solids in underground sites are stored in mining excavations, natural caverns, salt caverns, and in the pore spaces of rock formations. Aquifer formations are mainly isolated aquifers with significant spreading, permeability, and thickness, possessing highly mineralized non-potable waters. This study discusses the most important aspects that determine the storage of natural gas, hydrogen, or carbon dioxide in deep aquifers. In particular, the selection and characterization of the structure chosen for underground storage, the storage capacity, and the safety of the process are considered. The choice of underground sites is made on the basis of the following factors and criteria: geological, technical, economic, environmental, social, political, or administrative–legal. The geological and dynamic model of the storage site is then drawn based on the characteristics of the structure. Another important factor in choosing a structure for the storage of natural gas, hydrogen, or carbon dioxide is its capacity. In addition to the type and dimensions of the structure and the petrophysical parameters of the reservoir rock, the storage capacity is influenced by the properties of the stored gases and the operating parameters of the storage facility. Underground gas storage is a process fraught with natural and technical hazards. Therefore, the geological integrity of the structure under consideration should be documented and verified. This article also presents an analysis of the location and the basic parameters of gas storage and carbon dioxide storage facilities currently operating in underground aquifers. To date, there have been no successful attempts to store hydrogen under analogous conditions. This is mainly due to the parameters of this gas, which are associated with high requirements for its storage.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Uliasz-Misiak & Jacek Misiak, 2024. "Underground Gas Storage in Saline Aquifers: Geological Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:7:p:1666-:d:1367704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/7/1666/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/7/1666/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei, Liu & Jie, Chen & Deyi, Jiang & Xilin, Shi & Yinping, Li & Daemen, J.J.K. & Chunhe, Yang, 2016. "Tightness and suitability evaluation of abandoned salt caverns served as hydrocarbon energies storage under adverse geological conditions (AGC)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 703-720.
    2. Ismail Ismail & Vassilis Gaganis, 2023. "Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage in Saline Aquifers: Subsurface Policies, Development Plans, Well Control Strategies and Optimization Approaches—A Review," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-29, May.
    3. Chai, Maojie & Chen, Zhangxin & Nourozieh, Hossein & Yang, Min, 2023. "Numerical simulation of large-scale seasonal hydrogen storage in an anticline aquifer: A case study capturing hydrogen interactions and cushion gas injection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    4. Aminu, Mohammed D. & Nabavi, Seyed Ali & Rochelle, Christopher A. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2017. "A review of developments in carbon dioxide storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1389-1419.
    5. Bradshaw, J & Allinson, G & Bradshaw, B.E & Nguyen, V & Rigg, A.J & Spencer, L & Wilson, P, 2004. "Australia’s CO2 geological storage potential and matching of emission sources to potential sinks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1623-1631.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buttinelli, M. & Procesi, M. & Cantucci, B. & Quattrocchi, F. & Boschi, E., 2011. "The geo-database of caprock quality and deep saline aquifers distribution for geological storage of CO2 in Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2968-2983.
    2. Lankof, Leszek & Urbańczyk, Kazimierz & Tarkowski, Radosław, 2022. "Assessment of the potential for underground hydrogen storage in salt domes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Wei, Xinxing & Shi, Xilin & Li, Yinping & Liu, Hejuan & Li, Peng & Ban, Shengnan & Liang, Xiaopeng & Zhu, Shijie & Zhao, Kai & Yang, Kun & Huang, Si & Yang, Chunhe, 2023. "Advances in research on gas storage in sediment void of salt cavern in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    4. Reedman, Luke J. & Graham, Paul W., 2008. "Emissions Trading and the Convergence of the Australian Electricity and Transport Markets," 2008 Conference (52nd), February 5-8, 2008, Canberra, Australia 6042, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    5. Fan, Jing-Li & Shen, Shuo & Wei, Shi-Jie & Xu, Mao & Zhang, Xian, 2020. "Near-term CO2 storage potential for coal-fired power plants in China: A county-level source-sink matching assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    6. Zhang, Xiong & Liu, Wei & Chen, Jie & Jiang, Deyi & Fan, Jinyang & Daemen, J.J.K. & Qiao, Weibiao, 2022. "Large-scale CO2 disposal/storage in bedded rock salt caverns of China: An evaluation of safety and suitability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    7. Nan Zhang & Wei Liu & Yun Zhang & Pengfei Shan & Xilin Shi, 2020. "Microscopic Pore Structure of Surrounding Rock for Underground Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) Caverns in Bedded Rock Salt," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Haval Kukha Hawez & Taimoor Asim, 2024. "Impact of Regional Pressure Dissipation on Carbon Capture and Storage Projects: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-31, April.
    9. Ismail Ismail & Sofianos Panagiotis Fotias & Dimitris Avgoulas & Vassilis Gaganis, 2024. "Integrated Black Oil Modeling for Efficient Simulation and Optimization of Carbon Storage in Saline Aquifers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-30, April.
    10. Li, Wenjing & Miao, Xiuxiu & Wang, Jianfu & Li, Xiaozhao, 2023. "Study on thermodynamic behaviour of natural gas and thermo-mechanical response of salt caverns for underground gas storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    11. Barbara Uliasz-Misiak & Jacek Misiak & Joanna Lewandowska-Śmierzchalska, 2024. "Hydrogen Storage in Porous Rocks: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Barbara Uliasz-Misiak & Joanna Lewandowska-Śmierzchalska & Rafał Matuła, 2024. "Hydrogen Storage Potential in Natural Gas Deposits in the Polish Lowlands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Xitong Hu & Rupom Bhattacherjee & Kodjo Botchway & Jack C. Pashin & Goutam Chakraborty & Prem Bikkina, 2024. "CO 2 Storage Site Analysis, Screening, and Resource Estimation for Cenozoic Offshore Reservoirs in the Central Gulf of Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Katarzyna Luboń & Radosław Tarkowski, 2024. "Hydrogen Storage in Deep Saline Aquifers: Non-Recoverable Cushion Gas after Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Callas, Catherine & Saltzer, Sarah D. & Steve Davis, J. & Hashemi, Sam S. & Kovscek, Anthony R. & Okoroafor, Esuru R. & Wen, Gege & Zoback, Mark D. & Benson, Sally M., 2022. "Criteria and workflow for selecting depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs for carbon storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    16. Chen, Siyuan & Liu, Jiangfeng & Zhang, Qi & Teng, Fei & McLellan, Benjamin C., 2022. "A critical review on deployment planning and risk analysis of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) toward carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    17. Rui Cai & Hongling Ma & Xiaopeng Liang & Kai Zhao & Chunhe Yang, 2024. "Allowable Pillar Width for Salt Cavern Gas Storage Based on Triangular Well Layout: A Case Study in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:7:p:1666-:d:1367704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.