IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i23p7836-d1290322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Economic Comparative Analysis of Two Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for Powering a Simulated House, including a Hydrogen Vehicle Load at Jeju Island

Author

Listed:
  • Christelle Arielle Mbouteu Megaptche

    (Department of Physics, University of Nairobi, Nairobi P.O. Box 30197-00100, Kenya
    Distributed Energy Team, Jeju Global Research Center, Korea Institute of Energy Research, 200 Haemajihaean-ro, Gujwa-eup, Jeju-si 63357, Republic of Korea)

  • Hanki Kim

    (Distributed Energy Team, Jeju Global Research Center, Korea Institute of Energy Research, 200 Haemajihaean-ro, Gujwa-eup, Jeju-si 63357, Republic of Korea)

  • Peter Moses Musau

    (Department of Electrical Electronic and Information Engineering, South Eastern Kenya University, Kitui P.O. Box 170-90200, Kenya)

  • Sebastian Waita

    (Department of Physics, University of Nairobi, Nairobi P.O. Box 30197-00100, Kenya)

  • Bernard Aduda

    (Department of Physics, University of Nairobi, Nairobi P.O. Box 30197-00100, Kenya)

Abstract

This work undertakes a techno-economic comparative analysis of the design of photovoltaic panel/wind turbine/electrolyzer-H 2 tank–fuel cell/electrolyzer-H 2 tank (configuration 1) and photovoltaic panel/wind turbine/battery/electrolyzer-H 2 tank (configuration 2) to supply electricity to a simulated house and a hydrogen-powered vehicle on Jeju Island. The aim is to find a system that will make optimum use of the excess energy produced by renewable energies to power the hydrogen vehicle while guaranteeing the reliability and cost-effectiveness of the entire system. In addition to evaluating the Loss of Power Supply Probability (LPSP) and the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE), the search for achieving that objective leads to the evaluation of two new performance indicators: Loss of Hydrogen Supply Probability (LHSP) and Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH). After analysis, for 0 < LPSP < 1 and 0 < LHSP < 1 used as the constraints in a multi-objective genetic algorithm, configuration 1 turns out to be the most efficient loads feeder with an LCOE of 0.3322 USD/kWh, an LPSP of 0% concerning the simulated house load, an LCOH of 11.5671 USD/kg for a 5 kg hydrogen storage, and an LHSP of 0.0043% regarding the hydrogen vehicle load.

Suggested Citation

  • Christelle Arielle Mbouteu Megaptche & Hanki Kim & Peter Moses Musau & Sebastian Waita & Bernard Aduda, 2023. "Techno-Economic Comparative Analysis of Two Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for Powering a Simulated House, including a Hydrogen Vehicle Load at Jeju Island," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:23:p:7836-:d:1290322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/23/7836/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/23/7836/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Park, Joungho & Hwan Ryu, Kyung & Kim, Chang-Hee & Chul Cho, Won & Kim, MinJoong & Hun Lee, Jae & Cho, Hyun-Seok & Lee, Jay H., 2023. "Green hydrogen to tackle the power curtailment: Meteorological data-based capacity factor and techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    2. Baghaee, H.R. & Mirsalim, M. & Gharehpetian, G.B. & Talebi, H.A., 2016. "Reliability/cost-based multi-objective Pareto optimal design of stand-alone wind/PV/FC generation microgrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1022-1041.
    3. Falama, Ruben Zieba & Saidi, Abdelaziz Salah & Soulouknga, Marcel Hamda & Salah, Chokri Ben, 2023. "A techno-economic comparative study of renewable energy systems based different storage devices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiaxin Lu & Weijun Wang & Yingchao Zhang & Song Cheng, 2017. "Multi-Objective Optimal Design of Stand-Alone Hybrid Energy System Using Entropy Weight Method Based on HOMER," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Xu, Xiao & Hu, Weihao & Cao, Di & Liu, Wen & Huang, Qi & Hu, Yanting & Chen, Zhe, 2021. "Enhanced design of an offgrid PV-battery-methanation hybrid energy system for power/gas supply," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 440-456.
    3. Davoudkhani, Iraj Faraji & Dejamkhooy, Abdolmajid & Nowdeh, Saber Arabi, 2023. "A novel cloud-based framework for optimal design of stand-alone hybrid renewable energy system considering uncertainty and battery aging," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    4. He, Yi & Guo, Su & Zhou, Jianxu & Wu, Feng & Huang, Jing & Pei, Huanjin, 2021. "The many-objective optimal design of renewable energy cogeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    5. Davarzani, Sima & Pisica, Ioana & Taylor, Gareth A. & Munisami, Kevin J., 2021. "Residential Demand Response Strategies and Applications in Active Distribution Network Management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Rahmat Khezri & Amin Mahmoudi & Hirohisa Aki & S. M. Muyeen, 2021. "Optimal Planning of Remote Area Electricity Supply Systems: Comprehensive Review, Recent Developments and Future Scopes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-29, September.
    7. Naderipour, Amirreza & Ramtin, Amir Reza & Abdullah, Aldrin & Marzbali, Massoomeh Hedayati & Nowdeh, Saber Arabi & Kamyab, Hesam, 2022. "Hybrid energy system optimization with battery storage for remote area application considering loss of energy probability and economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    8. Förster, Robert & Kaiser, Matthias & Wenninger, Simon, 2023. "Future vehicle energy supply - sustainable design and operation of hybrid hydrogen and electric microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    9. Luo, Jianing & Li, Hangxin & Wang, Shengwei, 2022. "A quantitative reliability assessment and risk quantification method for microgrids considering supply and demand uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    10. Wenhao Zhuo & Andrey V. Savkin, 2019. "Profit Maximizing Control of a Microgrid with Renewable Generation and BESS Based on a Battery Cycle Life Model and Energy Price Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Lin, Xing-Min & Kireeva, Natalia & Timoshin, A.V. & Naderipour, Amirreza & Abdul-Malek, Zulkurnain & Kamyab, Hesam, 2021. "A multi-criteria framework for designing of stand-alone and grid-connected photovoltaic, wind, battery clean energy system considering reliability and economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    12. de Wildt, T.E. & Chappin, E.J.L. & van de Kaa, G. & Herder, P.M. & van de Poel, I.R., 2019. "Conflicting values in the smart electricity grid a comprehensive overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 184-196.
    13. Toopshekan, Ashkan & Yousefi, Hossein & Astaraei, Fatemeh Razi, 2020. "Technical, economic, and performance analysis of a hybrid energy system using a novel dispatch strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    14. Ashraf Ramadan & Mohamed Ebeed & Salah Kamel & Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz & Hassan Haes Alhelou, 2021. "Scenario-Based Stochastic Framework for Optimal Planning of Distribution Systems Including Renewable-Based DG Units," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Tanoto, Yusak & Haghdadi, Navid & Bruce, Anna & MacGill, Iain, 2021. "Reliability-cost trade-offs for electricity industry planning with high variable renewable energy penetrations in emerging economies: A case study of Indonesia’s Java-Bali grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    16. Escalera, Alberto & Hayes, Barry & Prodanović, Milan, 2018. "A survey of reliability assessment techniques for modern distribution networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 344-357.
    17. Bartolucci, Lorenzo & Cordiner, Stefano & Mulone, Vincenzo & Rocco, Vittorio & Rossi, Joao Luis, 2018. "Renewable source penetration and microgrids: Effects of MILP – Based control strategies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 416-426.
    18. Takele Ferede Agajie & Armand Fopah-Lele & Isaac Amoussou & Ahmed Ali & Baseem Khan & Om Prakash Mahela & Ramakrishna S. S. Nuvvula & Divine Khan Ngwashi & Emmanuel Soriano Flores & Emmanuel Tanyi, 2023. "Techno-Economic Analysis and Optimization of Hybrid Renewable Energy System with Energy Storage under Two Operational Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-31, July.
    19. Mukhopadhyay, Bineeta & Das, Debapriya, 2021. "Optimal multi-objective expansion planning of a droop-regulated islanded microgrid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    20. Chalaye, Pierrick & Sturmberg, Bjorn & Ransan-Cooper, Hedda & Lucas-Healey, Kathryn & Russell, A. Wendy & Hendriks, Johannes & Hansen, Paula & O'Neill, Matthew & Crowfoot, Warwick & Shorten, Phil, 2023. "Does site selection need to be democratized? A case study of grid-tied microgrids in Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:23:p:7836-:d:1290322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.