IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i7p2514-d782493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Method of Biomass Discrimination for Fast Assessment of Calorific Value

Author

Listed:
  • Jarosław Gocławski

    (Institute of Applied Computer Science, Lodz University of Technology, 18 Stefanowskiego Street, 90-537 Lodz, Poland)

  • Ewa Korzeniewska

    (Institute of Electrical Engineering Systems, Lodz University of Technology, 18 Stefanowskiego Street, 90-537 Lodz, Poland)

  • Joanna Sekulska-Nalewajko

    (Institute of Applied Computer Science, Lodz University of Technology, 18 Stefanowskiego Street, 90-537 Lodz, Poland)

  • Paweł Kiełbasa

    (Faculty of Production and Power Engineering, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Balicka Av. 116B, 30-149 Cracow, Poland)

  • Tomasz Dróżdż

    (Faculty of Production and Power Engineering, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Balicka Av. 116B, 30-149 Cracow, Poland)

Abstract

Crop byproducts are alternatives to nonrenewable energy resources. Burning biomass results in lower emission of undesirable nitrogen and sulfur oxides and contributes no significant greenhouse effect. There is a diverse range of energy-useful biomass, including in terms of calorific value. This article presents a new method of discriminating biomass, and of determining its calorific value. The method involves extracting the selected texture features on the surface of a briquette from a microscopic image and then classifying them using supervised classification methods. The fractal dimension, local binary pattern (LBP), and Haralick features are computed and then classified by linear discrimination analysis ( LDA ). The discrimination results are compared with the results obtained by random forest ( RF ) and deep neural network ( DNN ) type classifiers. This approach is superior in terms of complexity and operating time to other methods such as, for instance, the calorimetric method or analysis of the chemical composition of elements in a sample. In the normal operation mode, our method identifies the calorific value in the time of about 100 s, i.e., 90 times faster than traditional combustion of material samples. In predicting from a single sample image, the overall average accuracy of 95% was achieved for all tested classifiers. The authors’ idea to use ten input images of the same material and then majority voting after classification increases the discrimination system accuracy above 99%.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarosław Gocławski & Ewa Korzeniewska & Joanna Sekulska-Nalewajko & Paweł Kiełbasa & Tomasz Dróżdż, 2022. "Method of Biomass Discrimination for Fast Assessment of Calorific Value," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2514-:d:782493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2514/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2514/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veronika Chaloupková & Tatiana Ivanova & Ondřej Ekrt & Abraham Kabutey & David Herák, 2018. "Determination of Particle Size and Distribution through Image-Based Macroscopic Analysis of the Structure of Biomass Briquettes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Singh, Jaswinder, 2016. "Identifying an economic power production system based on agricultural straw on regional basis in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1140-1155.
    3. Sarkar, Nibedita & Ghosh, Sumanta Kumar & Bannerjee, Satarupa & Aikat, Kaustav, 2012. "Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: An overview," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 19-27.
    4. Naik, Satyanarayan & Goud, Vaibhav V. & Rout, Prasant K. & Jacobson, Kathlene & Dalai, Ajay K., 2010. "Characterization of Canadian biomass for alternative renewable biofuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1624-1631.
    5. Mikael Lantz & Thomas Prade & Serina Ahlgren & Lovisa Björnsson, 2018. "Biogas and Ethanol from Wheat Grain or Straw: Is There a Trade-Off between Climate Impact, Avoidance of iLUC and Production Cost?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-31, October.
    6. Renata Marks-Bielska & Stanisław Bielski & Anastasija Novikova & Kęstutis Romaneckas, 2019. "Straw Stocks as a Source of Renewable Energy. A Case Study of a District in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Piotr Gradziuk & Barbara Gradziuk & Anna Trocewicz & Błażej Jendrzejewski, 2020. "Potential of Straw for Energy Purposes in Poland—Forecasts Based on Trend and Causal Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    8. René Morissette & Philippe Savoie & Joey Villeneuve, 2011. "Combustion of Corn Stover Bales in a Small 146-kW Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(7), pages 1-10, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Izabella Maj, 2022. "Significance and Challenges of Poultry Litter and Cattle Manure as Sustainable Fuels: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Jadwiga Wyszkowska & Agata Borowik & Magdalena Zaborowska & Jan Kucharski, 2023. "Calorific Value of Zea mays Biomass Derived from Soil Contaminated with Chromium (VI) Disrupting the Soil’s Biochemical Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Gradziuk & Barbara Gradziuk & Anna Trocewicz & Błażej Jendrzejewski, 2020. "Potential of Straw for Energy Purposes in Poland—Forecasts Based on Trend and Causal Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Aldona Standar & Agnieszka Kozera & Łukasz Satoła, 2021. "The Importance of Local Investments Co-Financed by the European Union in the Field of Renewable Energy Sources in Rural Areas of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Stanisław Bielski & Renata Marks-Bielska & Anna Zielińska-Chmielewska & Kęstutis Romaneckas & Egidijus Šarauskis, 2021. "Importance of Agriculture in Creating Energy Security—A Case Study of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Gojiya, Anil & Deb, Dipankar & Iyer, Kannan K.R., 2019. "Feasibility study of power generation from agricultural residue in comparison with soil incorporation of residue," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 416-425.
    5. Jadwiga Wyszkowska & Agata Borowik & Magdalena Zaborowska & Jan Kucharski, 2023. "Calorific Value of Zea mays Biomass Derived from Soil Contaminated with Chromium (VI) Disrupting the Soil’s Biochemical Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Luis Armando Becerra-Pérez & Luis Rincón & John A. Posada-Duque, 2022. "Logistics and Costs of Agricultural Residues for Cellulosic Ethanol Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Bayrakci, Asiye Gül & Koçar, Günnur, 2014. "Second-generation bioethanol production from water hyacinth and duckweed in Izmir: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 306-316.
    8. Mohsen Jamali & Esmaeil Bakhshandeh & Mohammad Yaghoubi Khanghahi & Carmine Crecchio, 2021. "Metadata Analysis to Evaluate Environmental Impacts of Wheat Residues Burning on Soil Quality in Developing and Developed Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.
    9. M'Arimi, M.M. & Mecha, C.A. & Kiprop, A.K. & Ramkat, R., 2020. "Recent trends in applications of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in bioenergy production: Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    10. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Motevali, Ali & Ghobadian, Barat, 2019. "Ethanol production from date wastes: Adapted technologies, challenges, and global potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1094-1110.
    11. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Assar, Hossein Alizadeh & Ghobadian, Barat & Motevali, Ali, 2017. "Potential of biofuel production from pistachio waste in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 510-522.
    12. López-González, D. & Avalos-Ramirez, A. & Giroir-Fendler, A. & Godbout, S. & Fernandez-Lopez, M. & Sanchez-Silva, L. & Valverde, J.L., 2015. "Combustion kinetic study of woody and herbaceous crops by thermal analysis coupled to mass spectrometry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1626-1635.
    13. Hívila M. P. Marreiro & Rogério S. Peruchi & Riuzuani M. B. P. Lopes & Silvia L. F. Andersen & Sayonara A. Eliziário & Paulo Rotella Junior, 2021. "Empirical Studies on Biomass Briquette Production: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-40, December.
    14. Qu, Chunyun & Dai, Kaiqun & Fu, Hongxin & Wang, Jufang, 2021. "Enhanced ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoense SCUT27/ΔargR1864 with improved lignocellulose-derived inhibitors tolerance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 652-661.
    15. Chepeliev, Maksym & Diachuk, Oleksandr & Podolets, Roman & Trypolska, Galyna, 2021. "The role of bioenergy in Ukraine's climate mitigation policy by 2050," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    16. Erić, Aleksandar & Cvetinović, Dejan & Milutinović, Nada & Škobalj, Predrag & Bakić, Vukman, 2022. "Combined parametric modelling of biomass devolatilisation process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 13-22.
    17. Vallinayagam, R. & Vedharaj, S. & Yang, W.M. & Roberts, W.L. & Dibble, R.W., 2015. "Feasibility of using less viscous and lower cetane (LVLC) fuels in a diesel engine: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1166-1190.
    18. Oleg Bazaluk & Valerii Havrysh & Mykhailo Fedorchuk & Vitalii Nitsenko, 2021. "Energy Assessment of Sorghum Cultivation in Southern Ukraine," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Shirkavand, Ehsan & Baroutian, Saeid & Gapes, Daniel J. & Young, Brent R., 2016. "Combination of fungal and physicochemical processes for lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 217-234.
    20. M. N. Uddin & Kuaanan Techato & Juntakan Taweekun & Md Mofijur Rahman & M. G. Rasul & T. M. I. Mahlia & S. M. Ashrafur, 2018. "An Overview of Recent Developments in Biomass Pyrolysis Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2514-:d:782493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.