IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i7p2312-d777040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pre-Normative Charging Technology Roadmap for Heavy-Duty Electric Vehicles in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Mehrnaz Farzam Far

    (Electrical Powertrains and Storage, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 02150 Espoo, Finland)

  • Mikko Pihlatie

    (Electrical Powertrains and Storage, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 02150 Espoo, Finland)

  • Marko Paakkinen

    (Electrical Powertrains and Storage, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 02150 Espoo, Finland)

  • Marko Antila

    (Electrical Powertrains and Storage, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 02150 Espoo, Finland)

  • Aida Abdulah

    (Knowledge & Innovation, Bus Unit, International Association of Public Transport (UITP), Rue Sainté-Marie 6, 1080 Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

This paper presents a pre-normative roadmap that foresees the developments in the charging of heavy-duty electric vehicles (HD-EVs). It supports and facilitates the future standardization efforts of charging technologies by creating an overview of the popularity of charging technologies and the end users’ needs. The required input for the work was collected using a comprehensive investigation on the available charging technologies and their standardization, reviewing the existing roadmaps and research work, and conducting surveys and interviews of end users and technical stakeholders. According to the findings, a pantograph on the roof of a vehicle and plug-based charging are currently the most used charging interfaces. This trend is likely to continue in the future, since (1) pantographs on vehicle roofs, (2) pantographs on infrastructure, and (3) plugs were graded as charging interfaces with the highest potential by the participants of the technical survey. Static and conductive charging technologies show more potential than dynamic and wireless charging technologies. Nevertheless, inductive charging may be a future charging solution for HD-EVs if the current bottlenecks in the technology can be addressed. These bottlenecks include high prices, slightly lower efficiency, lack of standardization, the maximum achievable power, and safety concerns. Furthermore, interoperability was repeatedly mentioned as the main challenge for today’s charging technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehrnaz Farzam Far & Mikko Pihlatie & Marko Paakkinen & Marko Antila & Aida Abdulah, 2022. "Pre-Normative Charging Technology Roadmap for Heavy-Duty Electric Vehicles in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2312-:d:777040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2312/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2312/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noel, Lance & McCormack, Regina, 2014. "A cost benefit analysis of a V2G-capable electric school bus compared to a traditional diesel school bus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 246-255.
    2. Liimatainen, Heikki & van Vliet, Oscar & Aplyn, David, 2019. "The potential of electric trucks – An international commodity-level analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 804-814.
    3. Yu Feng & Xiaochun Lu, 2021. "Construction Planning and Operation of Battery Swapping Stations for Electric Vehicles: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olayiwola Alatise & Arkadeep Deb & Erfan Bashar & Jose Ortiz Gonzalez & Saeed Jahdi & Walid Issa, 2023. "A Review of Power Electronic Devices for Heavy Goods Vehicles Electrification: Performance and Reliability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Korberg, Andrei David & Skov, Iva Ridjan & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2020. "The role of biogas and biogas-derived fuels in a 100% renewable energy system in Denmark," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Mehdi Jahangir Samet & Heikki Liimatainen & Oscar Patrick René van Vliet & Markus Pöllänen, 2021. "Road Freight Transport Electrification Potential by Using Battery Electric Trucks in Finland and Switzerland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Kester, Johannes & Noel, Lance & Zarazua de Rubens, Gerardo, 2020. "Actors, business models, and innovation activity systems for vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Alabi, Oluwafisayo & Turner, Karen & Figus, Gioele & Katris, Antonios & Calvillo, Christian, 2020. "Can spending to upgrade electricity networks to support electric vehicles (EVs) roll-outs unlock value in the wider economy?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Fady M. A. Hassouna, 2022. "Urban Freight Transport Electrification in Westbank, Palestine: Environmental and Economic Benefits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, June.
    7. Christina Littlejohn & Stef Proost, 2021. "How to Be a Good Forerunner in Carbon Neutral Trucking," CESifo Working Paper Series 8876, CESifo.
    8. Azra Ghobadi & Mohammad Fallah & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam & Hamed Kazemipoor, 2022. "A Fuzzy Two-Echelon Model to Optimize Energy Consumption in an Urban Logistics Network with Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-31, October.
    9. Freitas Gomes, Icaro Silvestre & Perez, Yannick & Suomalainen, Emilia, 2020. "Coupling small batteries and PV generation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    10. Kim, Dong-Min & Lee, Soo-Gyung & Kim, Dae-Kee & Park, Min-Ro & Lim, Myung-Seop, 2022. "Sizing and optimization process of hybrid electric propulsion system for heavy-duty vehicle based on Gaussian process modeling considering traction motor characteristics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Ramona Rieckhof & Nadine May & Christoph Scope & Edeltraud Günther, 2016. "Ökonomisch-ökologischer Nettoeffekt der Elektromobilität im öffentlichen Personennahverkehr," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 107-119, June.
    12. Purnell, K. & Bruce, A.G. & MacGill, I., 2022. "Impacts of electrifying public transit on the electricity grid, from regional to state level analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    13. Zichong Lyu & Dirk Pons & Yilei Zhang, 2023. "Emissions and Total Cost of Ownership for Diesel and Battery Electric Freight Pickup and Delivery Trucks in New Zealand: Implications for Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.
    14. Noori, Mehdi & Zhao, Yang & Onat, Nuri C. & Gardner, Stephanie & Tatari, Omer, 2016. "Light-duty electric vehicles to improve the integrity of the electricity grid through Vehicle-to-Grid technology: Analysis of regional net revenue and emissions savings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 146-158.
    15. Jian, Linni & Zheng, Yanchong & Xiao, Xinping & Chan, C.C., 2015. "Optimal scheduling for vehicle-to-grid operation with stochastic connection of plug-in electric vehicles to smart grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 150-161.
    16. Sebastian Szymon Grzesiak & Adam Sulich, 2023. "Electromobility: Logistics and Business Ecosystem Perspectives Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-27, October.
    17. Carlo Cunanan & Manh-Kien Tran & Youngwoo Lee & Shinghei Kwok & Vincent Leung & Michael Fowler, 2021. "A Review of Heavy-Duty Vehicle Powertrain Technologies: Diesel Engine Vehicles, Battery Electric Vehicles, and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-16, June.
    18. McDonagh, Shane & Ahmed, Shorif & Desmond, Cian & Murphy, Jerry D, 2020. "Hydrogen from offshore wind: Investor perspective on the profitability of a hybrid system including for curtailment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    19. Bitencourt, Leonardo & Dias, Bruno & Soares, Tiago & Borba, Bruno & Quirós-Tortós, Jairo, 2023. "e-Carsharing siting and sizing DLMP-based under demand uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PB).
    20. Bálint Csonka, 2021. "Optimization of Static and Dynamic Charging Infrastructure for Electric Buses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2312-:d:777040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.