IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i6p1742-d521388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why We Continue to Need Energy Efficiency Programmes—A Critical Review Based on Experiences in Switzerland and Elsewhere

Author

Listed:
  • Martin K. Patel

    (Institute for Environmental Sciences (ISE) and Department Forel, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland)

  • Jean-Sébastien Broc

    (Institute for European Energy and Climate Policy (IEECP), 1043GR Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Haein Cho

    (Institute for Environmental Sciences (ISE) and Department Forel, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland)

  • Daniel Cabrera

    (Institute for Environmental Sciences (ISE) and Department Forel, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland)

  • Armin Eberle

    (Institute of Sustainable Development (INE), Zurich University of Applied Sciences (Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, ZHAW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland)

  • Alessandro Federici

    (Energy Efficiency Department, Italy’s National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, L’energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile, ENEA), 00044 Rome, Italy)

  • Alisa Freyre

    (Services Industriels de Genève (SIG), 1219 Geneva, Switzerland)

  • Cédric Jeanneret

    (Services Industriels de Genève (SIG), 1219 Geneva, Switzerland)

  • Kapil Narula

    (Institute for Environmental Sciences (ISE) and Department Forel, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland)

  • Vlasios Oikonomou

    (Institute for European Energy and Climate Policy (IEECP), 1043GR Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Selin Yilmaz

    (Institute for Environmental Sciences (ISE) and Department Forel, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland)

Abstract

Energy efficiency programmes (EEPs) are schemes operated by utilities or other bodies in order to incentivize energy efficiency improvement, in particular by adoption of energy-efficient products and typically by means of an economic reward. Ample experience has been gained, especially in the U.S., where EEPs have been in use for decades, with the rationale of avoiding additional energy supply by improving energy efficiency. More recently, EEPs have been implemented in Europe and in Switzerland. This review paper presents insights from the U.S., the EU and especially from Switzerland, with a focus on levelised programme cost of saved energy ( LPC ) as a key performance indicator. These LPC values, which take the perspective of the programme operator, are typically low to very low compared to the cost of electricity supply, thereby representing an important argument in favour of their use. The country examples show that EEPs are being effectively and successfully put into practice, for example, in Switzerland both as (i) a national tender-based scheme (called ProKilowatt) and in the form of a (ii) utility-operated obligation-based scheme (in Geneva). EEPs not only call for diligent implementation but also for suitable legal settings, e.g., in the form of mandatory energy efficiency savings targets (as realised for energy efficiency obligations, EEOs) in combination with programme cost recovery. The main criticism of EEPs is the free-rider effect, which needs to be minimised. On the other hand, EEPs are accompanied by significant co-benefits (environmental, health-related and social) and spillover effects. In their currently prevalent form, EEPs allow one to effectively save energy at a (very) low cost (“low-hanging fruit”). They can hence play an important role in fostering the energy transition; however, they should be implemented as part of a policy portfolio, in combination with other policy instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin K. Patel & Jean-Sébastien Broc & Haein Cho & Daniel Cabrera & Armin Eberle & Alessandro Federici & Alisa Freyre & Cédric Jeanneret & Kapil Narula & Vlasios Oikonomou & Selin Yilmaz, 2021. "Why We Continue to Need Energy Efficiency Programmes—A Critical Review Based on Experiences in Switzerland and Elsewhere," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-28, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:6:p:1742-:d:521388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/6/1742/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/6/1742/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth Gillingham & Karen Palmer, 2014. "Bridging the Energy Efficiency Gap: Policy Insights from Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 8(1), pages 18-38, January.
    2. Hirst, Eric & Goldman, Charles & Hopkins, Mary Ellen, 1991. "Integrated resource planning: Electric and gas utilities in the USA," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 172-186, January.
    3. Olsthoorn, Mark & Schleich, Joachim & Gassmann, Xavier & Faure, Corinne, 2017. "Free riding and rebates for residential energy efficiency upgrades: A multi-country contingent valuation experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(S1), pages 33-44.
    4. Markaki, M. & Belegri-Roboli, A. & Michaelides, P. & Mirasgedis, S. & Lalas, D.P., 2013. "The impact of clean energy investments on the Greek economy: An input–output analysis (2010–2020)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 263-275.
    5. Eric Malm, 1996. "An Actions-Based Estimate of the Free Rider Fraction in Electric Utility DSM Programs," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3), pages 41-48.
    6. Rosenow, Jan & Bayer, Edith, 2017. "Costs and benefits of Energy Efficiency Obligations: A review of European programmes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 53-62.
    7. Tvinnereim, Endre & Mehling, Michael, 2018. "Carbon pricing and deep decarbonisation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 185-189.
    8. Krewitt, Wolfram, 2002. "External costs of energy--do the answers match the questions?: Looking back at 10 years of ExternE," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 839-848, August.
    9. Yushchenko, Alisa & Patel, Martin Kumar, 2017. "Cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency programs: How to better understand and improve from multiple stakeholder perspectives?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 538-550.
    10. Jean-Sébastien Broc & Catherine Guermont & Christian Deconninck & Marie-Laure Nauleau, 2017. "Impacts and cost-effectiveness of major energy efficiency policies for existing buildings: what do we exactly know and what can we learn?," Post-Print hal-01577516, HAL.
    11. Florian Landis, Sebastian Rausch, Mirjam Kosch, and Christoph Böhringer, 2019. "Efficient and Equitable Policy Design: Taxing Energy Use or Promoting Energy Savings?," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    12. Reuter, Matthias & Patel, Martin K. & Eichhammer, Wolfgang & Lapillonne, Bruno & Pollier, Karine, 2020. "A comprehensive indicator set for measuring multiple benefits of energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    13. Stirling, Andrew, 1997. "Limits to the value of external costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 517-540, April.
    14. Louis-Gaetan Giraudet and Dominique Finon, 2015. "European experiences with white certifirecate obligations: A critical review of existing evaluations," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    15. Nicolas Antheaume, 2004. "Valuing external costs - from theory to practice: implications for full cost environmental accounting," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 443-464.
    16. Tuominen, Pekka & Forsström, Juha & Honkatukia, Juha, 2013. "Economic effects of energy efficiency improvements in the Finnish building stock," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 181-189.
    17. Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm & Kronenberg, Tobias & Hansen, Patrick, 2010. "The social return on investment in the energy efficiency of buildings in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4317-4329, August.
    18. DeCanio, Stephen J, 1998. "The efficiency paradox: bureaucratic and organizational barriers to profitable energy-saving investments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 441-454, April.
    19. Rohdin, P. & Thollander, P., 2006. "Barriers to and driving forces for energy efficiency in the non-energy intensive manufacturing industry in Sweden," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1836-1844.
    20. Philippe Quirion, 2013. "L'effet net sur l'emploi de la transition énergétique en France : Une analyse input-output du scénario négaWatt," Working Papers hal-00866447, HAL.
    21. Rosenow, Jan & Platt, Reg & Demurtas, Andrea, 2014. "Fiscal impacts of energy efficiency programmes—The example of solid wall insulation investment in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 610-620.
    22. Scott, Michael J. & Roop, Joseph M. & Schultz, Robert W. & Anderson, David M. & Cort, Katherine A., 2008. "The impact of DOE building technology energy efficiency programs on U.S. employment, income, and investment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 2283-2301, September.
    23. Wei, Max & Patadia, Shana & Kammen, Daniel M., 2010. "Putting renewables and energy efficiency to work: How many jobs can the clean energy industry generate in the US?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 919-931, February.
    24. Yushchenko, Alisa & Patel, Martin Kumar, 2016. "Contributing to a green energy economy? A macroeconomic analysis of an energy efficiency program operated by a Swiss utility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1304-1320.
    25. Louis-Gaëtan Giraudet, 2018. "Energy efficiency as a credence good: A review of informational barriers to building energy savings," Working Papers 2018.07, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    26. Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan, 2020. "Energy efficiency as a credence good: A review of informational barriers to energy savings in the building sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    27. Bertoldi, Paolo & Rezessy, Silvia & Lees, Eoin & Baudry, Paul & Jeandel, Alexandre & Labanca, Nicola, 2010. "Energy supplier obligations and white certificate schemes: Comparative analysis of experiences in the European Union," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1455-1469, March.
    28. Todd Gerarden & Richard G. Newell & Robert N. Stavins, 2015. "Deconstructing the Energy-Efficiency Gap: Conceptual Frameworks and Evidence," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 183-186, May.
    29. Hartwig, Johannes & Kockat, Judit & Schade, Wolfgang & Braungardt, Sibylle, 2017. "The macroeconomic effects of ambitious energy efficiency policy in Germany – Combining bottom-up energy modelling with a non-equilibrium macroeconomic model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 510-520.
    30. repec:aen:journl:eeep4_1_giraudet is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Bo & Han, Yukai & Wang, Chensheng & Sun, Wei, 2022. "Did civilized city policy improve energy efficiency of resource-based cities? Prefecture-level evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Fouiteh, Imane & Cabrera Santelices, José Daniel & Patel, Martin K., 2023. "How committed are swiss utilities to energy saving without being obligated to do so?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Tzani, Dimitra & Stavrakas, Vassilis & Santini, Marion & Thomas, Samuel & Rosenow, Jan & Flamos, Alexandros, 2022. "Pioneering a performance-based future for energy efficiency: Lessons learnt from a comparative review analysis of pay-for-performance programmes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yushchenko, Alisa & Patel, Martin Kumar, 2016. "Contributing to a green energy economy? A macroeconomic analysis of an energy efficiency program operated by a Swiss utility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1304-1320.
    2. Costantini, Valeria & Crespi, Francesco & Paglialunga, Elena, 2018. "The employment impact of private and public actions for energy efficiency: Evidence from European industries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 250-267.
    3. Mikulić, Davor & Bakarić, Ivana Rašić & Slijepčević, Sunčana, 2016. "The economic impact of energy saving retrofits of residential and public buildings in Croatia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 630-644.
    4. Rolando Biere-Arenas & Silvia Spairani-Berrio & Yolanda Spairani-Berrio & Carlos Marmolejo-Duarte, 2021. "One-Stop-Shops for Energy Renovation of Dwellings in Europe—Approach to the Factors That Determine Success and Future Lines of Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Franzò, Simone & Frattini, Federico & Cagno, Enrico & Trianni, Andrea, 2019. "A multi-stakeholder analysis of the economic efficiency of industrial energy efficiency policies: Empirical evidence from ten years of the Italian White Certificate Scheme," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 424-435.
    6. Katris, Antonios & Turner, Karen, 2021. "Can different approaches to funding household energy efficiency deliver on economic and social policy objectives? ECO and alternatives in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Schleich, Joachim & Faure, Corinne & Meissner, Thomas, 2021. "Adoption of retrofit measures among homeowners in EU countries: The effects of access to capital and debt aversion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    8. Artur Meynkhard, 2019. "Energy Efficient Development Model for Regions of the Russian Federation: Evidence of Crypto Mining," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(4), pages 16-21.
    9. Quentin Perrier & Philippe Quirion, 2016. "La transition énergétique est-elle favorable aux branches à fort contenu en emploi ? Une approche input-output pour la France," Working Papers 2016.09, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    10. Choi, Jun-Ki & Eom, Jiyong & McClory, Emma, 2018. "Economic and environmental impacts of local utility-delivered industrial energy-efficiency rebate programs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 289-298.
    11. Reuter, Matthias & Patel, Martin K. & Eichhammer, Wolfgang & Lapillonne, Bruno & Pollier, Karine, 2020. "A comprehensive indicator set for measuring multiple benefits of energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    12. Li, Jia & Just, Richard E., 2018. "Modeling household energy consumption and adoption of energy efficient technology," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 404-415.
    13. Quentin Perrier & Philippe Quirion, 2017. "La transition énergétique est-elle favorable aux branches à fort contenu en emploi ? Une analyse input-output pour la France," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 127(5), pages 851-887.
    14. Paolo Bertoldi & Marina Economidou & Valentina Palermo & Benigna Boza‐Kiss & Valeria Todeschi, 2021. "How to finance energy renovation of residential buildings: Review of current and emerging financing instruments in the EU," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), January.
    15. Perrier, Quentin & Quirion, Philippe, 2018. "How shifting investment towards low-carbon sectors impacts employment: Three determinants under scrutiny," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 464-483.
    16. Valeriia Denisova, 2019. "Energy Efficiency as a Way to Ecological Safety: Evidence From Russia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 32-37.
    17. Andra Blumberga & Reinis Āzis & Dāvis Reinbergs & Ieva Pakere & Dagnija Blumberga, 2021. "The Bright and Dark Sides of Energy Efficiency Obligation Scheme: The Case of Latvia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Luca Caneparo, 2020. "Financing the (Environmental) Quality of Cities with Energy Efficiency Investments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Evgeniy Lopatin, 2019. "Methodological Approaches to Research Resource Saving Industrial Enterprises," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(4), pages 181-187.
    20. Olsthoorn, Mark & Schleich, Joachim & Hirzel, Simon, 2017. "Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures for Non-residential Buildings: Technological and Organizational Heterogeneity in the Trade, Commerce and Services Sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 240-254.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:6:p:1742-:d:521388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.