IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i16p4980-d614063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biofuels for Maritime Transportation: A Spatial, Techno-Economic, and Logistic Analysis in Brazil, Europe, South Africa, and the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Francielle Carvalho

    (Centro de Tecnologia, Energy Planning Program, Graduate School of Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-594, Brazil)

  • Joana Portugal-Pereira

    (Centro de Tecnologia, Energy Planning Program, Graduate School of Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-594, Brazil)

  • Martin Junginger

    (Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Alexandre Szklo

    (Centro de Tecnologia, Energy Planning Program, Graduate School of Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-594, Brazil)

Abstract

Low or zero carbon fuels are crucial for maritime transportation decarbonization goals. This paper assesses potential localities for maritime biofuels (biobunkers) production in Brazil, Europe, South Africa, and United States considering geographical, logistic, and economic aspects. This assessment combines georeferenced and techno-economic analyses to identify suitable fuel production hotspots based on not only plant performance and costs but also on logistic integration and biomass seasonality. Five technology pathways were considered: Straight vegetable Oils (SVO), Hydrotreated Vegetable Oils (HVO), Fischer–Tropsch Biomass-to-liquids (FT-BTL), Alcohol oligomerization to middle distillates (ATD), and Hydrotreated Pyrolysis Oil (HDPO). Findings reveal that biomass concentration in Brazil makes it the region with highest biobunker potential, which are mostly close to coastal areas and surpasses regional demand. Although other regions registered more limited potentials, hotspots proximity to ports would enable fossil fuel replacements in these areas. For all cases, biobunker costs (USD 21–104/GJ) are higher than conventional marine fuels prices (USD 11–17/GJ). Only 15% of the hotspots’ carbon prices that would allow its competitiveness are lower than USD 100/tCO 2 . Alternatives to incentivize biobunker production would be, first, to establish mandatory fuel blends and second, to join forces with other sectors that would be benefited from the co-production of advanced biofuels.

Suggested Citation

  • Francielle Carvalho & Joana Portugal-Pereira & Martin Junginger & Alexandre Szklo, 2021. "Biofuels for Maritime Transportation: A Spatial, Techno-Economic, and Logistic Analysis in Brazil, Europe, South Africa, and the USA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-27, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:4980-:d:614063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/4980/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/4980/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitriou, Ioanna & Goldingay, Harry & Bridgwater, Anthony V., 2018. "Techno-economic and uncertainty analysis of Biomass to Liquid (BTL) systems for transport fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 160-175.
    2. Sultana, Arifa & Kumar, Amit, 2014. "Development of tortuosity factor for assessment of lignocellulosic biomass delivery cost to a biorefinery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 288-295.
    3. Visser, L. & Hoefnagels, R. & Junginger, M., 2020. "Wood pellet supply chain costs – A review and cost optimization analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Karin Andersson & Selma Brynolf & Julia Hansson & Maria Grahn, 2020. "Criteria and Decision Support for A Sustainable Choice of Alternative Marine Fuels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Bengtsson, Selma & Fridell, Erik & Andersson, Karin, 2012. "Environmental assessment of two pathways towards the use of biofuels in shipping," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 451-463.
    6. Safarian, Sahar & Unnþórsson, Rúnar & Richter, Christiaan, 2019. "A review of biomass gasification modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 378-391.
    7. Morrison, Geoff M. & Witcover, Julie & Parker, Nathan C. & Fulton, Lew, 2016. "Three routes forward for biofuels: Incremental, leapfrog, and transitional," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 64-73.
    8. Müller-Casseres, Eduardo & Carvalho, Francielle & Nogueira, Tainan & Fonte, Clarissa & Império, Mariana & Poggio, Matheus & Wei, Huang Ken & Portugal-Pereira, Joana & Rochedo, Pedro R.R. & Szklo, Alex, 2021. "Production of alternative marine fuels in Brazil: An integrated assessment perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    9. Blin, J. & Brunschwig, C. & Chapuis, A. & Changotade, O. & Sidibe, S.S. & Noumi, E.S. & Girard, P., 2013. "Characteristics of vegetable oils for use as fuel in stationary diesel engines—Towards specifications for a standard in West Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 580-597.
    10. Gilbert, Paul, 2014. "From reductionism to systems thinking: How the shipping sector can address sulphur regulation and tackle climate change," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 376-378.
    11. Klein, Bruno Colling & Chagas, Mateus Ferreira & Junqueira, Tassia Lopes & Rezende, Mylene Cristina Alves Ferreira & Cardoso, Terezinha de Fátima & Cavalett, Otavio & Bonomi, Antonio, 2018. "Techno-economic and environmental assessment of renewable jet fuel production in integrated Brazilian sugarcane biorefineries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 290-305.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vinicius Andrade dos Santos & Patrícia Pereira da Silva & Luís Manuel Ventura Serrano, 2022. "The Maritime Sector and Its Problematic Decarbonization: A Systematic Review of the Contribution of Alternative Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-30, May.
    2. Alejandro Ortega & Konstantinos Gkoumas & Anastasios Tsakalidis & Ferenc Pekár, 2021. "Low-Emission Alternative Energy for Transport in the EU: State of Play of Research and Innovation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Nepomuceno de Oliveira, Maurício Aguilar & Szklo, Alexandre & Castelo Branco, David Alves, 2022. "Implementation of Maritime Transport Mitigation Measures according to their marginal abatement costs and their mitigation potentials," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Francisco Rosillo-Calle, 2022. "New Insights into Biomass and Biofuels in Rapidly Changing Energy Scenario," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-5, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jéssica Marcon Bressanin & Bruno Colling Klein & Mateus Ferreira Chagas & Marcos Djun Barbosa Watanabe & Isabelle Lobo de Mesquita Sampaio & Antonio Bonomi & Edvaldo Rodrigo de Morais & Otávio Cavalet, 2020. "Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Gasification and Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis Integrated to Sugarcane Biorefineries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Al Baroudi, Hisham & Awoyomi, Adeola & Patchigolla, Kumar & Jonnalagadda, Kranthi & Anthony, E.J., 2021. "A review of large-scale CO2 shipping and marine emissions management for carbon capture, utilisation and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    3. ben Brahim, Till & Wiese, Frauke & Münster, Marie, 2019. "Pathways to climate-neutral shipping: A Danish case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Linda Dominique Fabiola Bambara & Marie Sawadogo & Daniel Roy & Didier Anciaux & Joël Blin & Salifou Koucka Ouiminga, 2018. "Biofuel from Balanites aegyptiaca : Optimization of the Feedstock Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Bilgili, Levent, 2023. "A systematic review on the acceptance of alternative marine fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    6. Petersen, Abdul M. & Chireshe, Farai & Gorgens, Johann F. & Van Dyk, Johan, 2022. "Flowsheet analysis of gasification-synthesis-refining for sustainable aviation fuel production from invasive alien plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    7. Salehi-Amiri, Amirhossein & Zahedi, Ali & Akbapour, Navid & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa, 2021. "Designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network for walnut industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    8. Buentello-Montoya, D.A. & Duarte-Ruiz, C.A. & Maldonado-Escalante, J.F., 2023. "Co-gasification of waste PET, PP and biomass for energy recovery: A thermodynamic model to assess the produced syngas quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    9. Navas-Anguita, Zaira & García-Gusano, Diego & Iribarren, Diego, 2019. "A review of techno-economic data for road transportation fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 11-26.
    10. Cheteni, Priviledge, 2017. "Sustainability development: Biofuels in agriculture," MPRA Paper 80969, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Jun 2017.
    11. Neves, Renato Cruz & Klein, Bruno Colling & da Silva, Ricardo Justino & Rezende, Mylene Cristina Alves Ferreira & Funke, Axel & Olivarez-Gómez, Edgardo & Bonomi, Antonio & Maciel-Filho, Rubens, 2020. "A vision on biomass-to-liquids (BTL) thermochemical routes in integrated sugarcane biorefineries for biojet fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    12. Anastasia Christodoulou & Kevin Cullinane, 0. "Potential for, and drivers of, private voluntary initiatives for the decarbonisation of short sea shipping: evidence from a Swedish ferry line," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    13. Raquel de Souza Deuber & Jéssica Marcon Bressanin & Daniel Santos Fernandes & Henrique Real Guimarães & Mateus Ferreira Chagas & Antonio Bonomi & Leonardo Vasconcelos Fregolente & Marcos Djun Barbosa , 2023. "Production of Sustainable Aviation Fuels from Lignocellulosic Residues in Brazil through Hydrothermal Liquefaction: Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Andrzej Bochniak & Monika Stoma, 2021. "Estimating the Optimal Location for the Storage of Pellet Surplus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Ruivo, Luís & Silva, Tiago & Neves, Daniel & Tarelho, Luís & Frade, Jorge, 2023. "Thermodynamic guidelines for improved operation of iron-based catalysts in gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    16. Chiong, Meng-Choung & Kang, Hooi-Siang & Shaharuddin, Nik Mohd Ridzuan & Mat, Shabudin & Quen, Lee Kee & Ten, Ki-Hong & Ong, Muk Chen, 2021. "Challenges and opportunities of marine propulsion with alternative fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    17. Zhang, Hanfei & Wang, Ligang & Van herle, Jan & Maréchal, François & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Techno-economic evaluation of biomass-to-fuels with solid-oxide electrolyzer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    18. Piotr F. Borowski, 2022. "Management of Energy Enterprises in Zero-Emission Conditions: Bamboo as an Innovative Biomass for the Production of Green Energy by Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, March.
    19. Anastasia Christodoulou & Kevin Cullinane, 2021. "Potential for, and drivers of, private voluntary initiatives for the decarbonisation of short sea shipping: evidence from a Swedish ferry line," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(4), pages 632-654, December.
    20. Ahmed, Shoaib & Li, Tie & Yi, Ping & Chen, Run, 2023. "Environmental impact assessment of green ammonia-powered very large tanker ship for decarbonized future shipping operations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:4980-:d:614063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.