IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i12p3600-d576513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Degradation Assessment of Battery Energy Storage Systems in PV Smoothing Application

Author

Listed:
  • Valentin Silvera Diaz

    (Renewable Energy Center, Itaipu Technological Park Foundation—FPTI, 85867-900 Paraná City, Brazil
    Research Group on Energy & Energy Sustainability (GPEnSE/CNPq), Federal University of Latin American Integration—UNILA, 85867-000 Paraná City, Brazil)

  • Daniel Augusto Cantane

    (Renewable Energy Center, Itaipu Technological Park Foundation—FPTI, 85867-900 Paraná City, Brazil)

  • André Quites Ordovás Santos

    (Research Group on Energy & Energy Sustainability (GPEnSE/CNPq), Federal University of Latin American Integration—UNILA, 85867-000 Paraná City, Brazil)

  • Oswaldo Hideo Ando Junior

    (Research Group on Energy & Energy Sustainability (GPEnSE/CNPq), Federal University of Latin American Integration—UNILA, 85867-000 Paraná City, Brazil)

Abstract

Photovoltaic (PV) generation depends on the availability of solar resources, being directly influenced by the variation in irradiance due to the presence of clouds over the PV panels, causing a variation in the power output. The use of battery energy storage systems integrated with the PV showed to be a technically feasible solution to mitigate these power output fluctuations within the maximum ramp limit. Most articles reported in the literature on smoothing PV power output, by coupling with battery degradation as performance indicators of the control strategy, used the event-oriented model that considers only the number of cycles and depth of discharge. This paper presents on the comparative analysis of two approaches to battery degradation models, an event-oriented model based on the Rainflow counting and a semiempirical model, and applies to photovoltaic power smoothing by using a wide range of restrictions and installed PV plant capacities. The semi-empirical degradation model revealed higher battery degradation for all simulated cases. For Strategy 2, the order was 50% higher than the event-oriented model, probably due to severe DR and RR, which increases the stress on the battery. For Strategy 1, the difference was greater, between 100% and 300%. The event-based model indicated that Strategy 1 implied less battery degradation, but the semi-empirical model indicated the opposite. Considering that the semi-empirical model considers more parameters of degradation, the fact that Strategy 2 implies less degradation is more reliable. Moreover, the result obtained by the SimSES model corroborates that the accelerated lithium cell battery degradation takes place, as the operation is at high SoC. Maintaining Ebat, reference is SoC 80% decreased the degradation in at least 25% with respect to degradation, maintaining Ebat, reference is SoC 100%. For this, Ebat, reference of the SoC control, can be designed to avoid operating under a high load state. The results demonstrated that choosing a simplified degradation model approach can lead to an error in the conclusion of which strategies are the best since calendar life effects are very important in the application of PV power smoothing.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentin Silvera Diaz & Daniel Augusto Cantane & André Quites Ordovás Santos & Oswaldo Hideo Ando Junior, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Degradation Assessment of Battery Energy Storage Systems in PV Smoothing Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3600-:d:576513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3600/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3600/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nouha Mansouri & Abderezak Lashab & Dezso Sera & Josep M. Guerrero & Adnen Cherif, 2019. "Large Photovoltaic Power Plants Integration: A Review of Challenges and Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Javier Marcos & Iñigo De la Parra & Miguel García & Luis Marroyo, 2014. "Control Strategies to Smooth Short-Term Power Fluctuations in Large Photovoltaic Plants Using Battery Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Shivashankar, S. & Mekhilef, Saad & Mokhlis, Hazlie & Karimi, M., 2016. "Mitigating methods of power fluctuation of photovoltaic (PV) sources – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1170-1184.
    4. João Martins & Sergiu Spataru & Dezso Sera & Daniel-Ioan Stroe & Abderezak Lashab, 2019. "Comparative Study of Ramp-Rate Control Algorithms for PV with Energy Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, April.
    5. van Haaren, Rob & Morjaria, Mahesh & Fthenakis, Vasilis, 2015. "An energy storage algorithm for ramp rate control of utility scale PV (photovoltaics) plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 894-902.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nataliia Shamarova & Konstantin Suslov & Pavel Ilyushin & Ilia Shushpanov, 2022. "Review of Battery Energy Storage Systems Modeling in Microgrids with Renewables Considering Battery Degradation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arévalo, Paul & Benavides, Dario & Tostado-Véliz, Marcos & Aguado, José A. & Jurado, Francisco, 2023. "Smart monitoring method for photovoltaic systems and failure control based on power smoothing techniques," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 366-383.
    2. Gonzalez-Moreno, A. & Marcos, J. & de la Parra, I. & Marroyo, L., 2022. "A PV ramp-rate control strategy to extend battery lifespan using forecasting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    3. Lappalainen, Kari & Wang, Guang C. & Kleissl, Jan, 2020. "Estimation of the largest expected photovoltaic power ramp rates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    4. Wei Ma & Wei Wang & Xuezhi Wu & Ruonan Hu & Fen Tang & Weige Zhang, 2019. "Control Strategy of a Hybrid Energy Storage System to Smooth Photovoltaic Power Fluctuations Considering Photovoltaic Output Power Curtailment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Jiang, Zhimin & Cai, Jie & Moses, Paul S., 2020. "Smoothing control of solar photovoltaic generation using building thermal loads," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    6. Luana Pontes & Tatiane Costa & Amanda Souza & Nicolau Dantas & Andrea Vasconcelos & Guilherme Rissi & Roberto Dias & Mohamed A. Mohamed & Pierluigi Siano & Manoel Marinho, 2023. "Operational Data Analysis of a Battery Energy Storage System to Support Wind Energy Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Abebe Tilahun Tadie & Zhizhong Guo & Ying Xu, 2022. "Hybrid Model-Based BESS Sizing and Control for Wind Energy Ramp Rate Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Lappalainen, Kari & Valkealahti, Seppo, 2022. "Sizing of energy storage systems for ramp rate control of photovoltaic strings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1366-1375.
    9. Igor Cavalcante Torres & Daniel M. Farias & Andre L. L. Aquino & Chigueru Tiba, 2021. "Voltage Regulation For Residential Prosumers Using a Set of Scalable Power Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-28, June.
    10. Luis Gerardo González & Rommel Chacon & Bernardo Delgado & Dario Benavides & Juan Espinoza, 2020. "Study of Energy Compensation Techniques in Photovoltaic Solar Systems with the Use of Supercapacitors in Low-Voltage Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Cabrera-Tobar, Ana & Bullich-Massagué, Eduard & Aragüés-Peñalba, Mònica & Gomis-Bellmunt, Oriol, 2016. "Review of advanced grid requirements for the integration of large scale photovoltaic power plants in the transmission system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 971-987.
    12. Federica Cucchiella & Idiano D’Adamo & Paolo Rosa, 2015. "Industrial Photovoltaic Systems: An Economic Analysis in Non-Subsidized Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Tathagata Sarkar & Ankur Bhattacharjee & Kanak Mukhopadhyay & Konika Das Bhattacharya & Hiranmay Saha, 2018. "Energy Non-Availability in Distribution Grids with Heavy Penetration of Solar Power: Assessment and Mitigation through Solar Smoother," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Fan Wu & Jun Wang & Zhang Sun & Tao Wang & Lei Chen & Xiaoyan Han, 2019. "An Optimal Wavelet Packets Basis Method for Cascade Hydro-PV-Pumped Storage Generation Systems to Smooth Photovoltaic Power Fluctuations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Yang, Yuqing & Bremner, Stephen & Menictas, Chris & Kay, Merlinde, 2022. "Forecasting error processing techniques and frequency domain decomposition for forecasting error compensation and renewable energy firming in hybrid systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    16. Lu, Qing & Yu, Hao & Zhao, Kangli & Leng, Yajun & Hou, Jianchao & Xie, Pinjie, 2019. "Residential demand response considering distributed PV consumption: A model based on China's PV policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 443-456.
    17. Wenjie Liu & Kamran Ali Khan Niazi & Tamas Kerekes & Yongheng Yang, 2019. "A Review on Transformerless Step-Up Single-Phase Inverters with Different DC-Link Voltage for Photovoltaic Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Jose Miguel Riquelme-Dominguez & Jesús Riquelme & Sergio Martinez, 2022. "New Trends in the Control of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems for the Provision of Ancillary Services," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-11, October.
    19. Kotowicz, Janusz & Bartela, Łukasz & Węcel, Daniel & Dubiel, Klaudia, 2017. "Hydrogen generator characteristics for storage of renewably-generated energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 156-171.
    20. Frank, Matthias & Deja, Robert & Peters, Roland & Blum, Ludger & Stolten, Detlef, 2018. "Bypassing renewable variability with a reversible solid oxide cell plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 101-112.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3600-:d:576513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.