IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i12p3571-d575620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taxonomy, Saving Potentials and Key Performance Indicators for Energy End-Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Aluminium Industry and Aluminium Casting Foundries

Author

Listed:
  • Joakim Haraldsson

    (Department of Management and Engineering, Division of Energy Systems, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden)

  • Simon Johnsson

    (Department of Management and Engineering, Division of Energy Systems, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden)

  • Patrik Thollander

    (Department of Management and Engineering, Division of Energy Systems, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden)

  • Magnus Wallén

    (Department of Management and Engineering, Division of Energy Systems, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden)

Abstract

Increasing energy efficiency within the industrial sector is one of the main approaches in order to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions. The production and processing of aluminium is energy and greenhouse gas intensive. To make well-founded decisions regarding energy efficiency and greenhouse gas mitigating investments, it is necessary to have relevant key performance indicators and information about energy end-use. This paper develops a taxonomy and key performance indicators for energy end-use and greenhouse gas emissions in the aluminium industry and aluminium casting foundries. This taxonomy is applied to the Swedish aluminium industry and two foundries. Potentials for energy saving and greenhouse gas mitigation are estimated regarding static facility operation. Electrolysis in primary production is by far the largest energy using and greenhouse gas emitting process within the Swedish aluminium industry. Notably, almost half of the total greenhouse gas emissions from electrolysis comes from process-related emissions, while the other half comes from the use of electricity. In total, about 236 GWh/year (or 9.2% of the total energy use) and 5588–202,475 tonnes CO 2eq /year can be saved in the Swedish aluminium industry and two aluminium casting foundries. The most important key performance indicators identified for energy end-use and greenhouse gas emissions are MWh/tonne product and tonne CO 2 -eq/tonne product. The most beneficial option would be to allocate energy use and greenhouse gas emissions to both the process or machine level and the product level, as this would give a more detailed picture of the company’s energy use and greenhouse gas emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Joakim Haraldsson & Simon Johnsson & Patrik Thollander & Magnus Wallén, 2021. "Taxonomy, Saving Potentials and Key Performance Indicators for Energy End-Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Aluminium Industry and Aluminium Casting Foundries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3571-:d:575620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3571/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3571/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haraldsson, Joakim & Johansson, Maria T., 2018. "Review of measures for improved energy efficiency in production-related processes in the aluminium industry – From electrolysis to recycling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 525-548.
    2. Xu, Tengfang & Flapper, Joris & Kramer, Klaas Jan, 2009. "Characterization of energy use and performance of global cheese processing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 1993-2000.
    3. Fleiter, Tobias & Hirzel, Simon & Worrell, Ernst, 2012. "The characteristics of energy-efficiency measures – a neglected dimension," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 502-513.
    4. Andersson, Elias & Karlsson, Magnus & Thollander, Patrik & Paramonova, Svetlana, 2018. "Energy end-use and efficiency potentials among Swedish industrial small and medium-sized enterprises – A dataset analysis from the national energy audit program," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 165-177.
    5. Johnsson, Simon & Andersson, Elias & Thollander, Patrik & Karlsson, Magnus, 2019. "Energy savings and greenhouse gas mitigation potential in the Swedish wood industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Tesema, Gudise & Worrell, Ernst, 2015. "Energy efficiency improvement potentials for the cement industry in Ethiopia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2042-2052.
    7. Oecd, 2019. "Measuring distortions in international markets: The aluminium value chain," OECD Trade Policy Papers 218, OECD Publishing.
    8. Trianni, Andrea & Cagno, Enrico & De Donatis, Alessio, 2014. "A framework to characterize energy efficiency measures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 207-220.
    9. Backlund, Sandra & Thollander, Patrik, 2015. "Impact after three years of the Swedish energy audit program," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 54-60.
    10. Saidur, R. & Rahim, N.A. & Masjuki, H.H. & Mekhilef, S. & Ping, H.W. & Jamaluddin, M.F., 2009. "End-use energy analysis in the Malaysian industrial sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 153-158.
    11. Saygin, D. & Worrell, E. & Patel, M.K. & Gielen, D.J., 2011. "Benchmarking the energy use of energy-intensive industries in industrialized and in developing countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6661-6673.
    12. Dotzauer, Erik, 2010. "Greenhouse gas emissions from power generation and consumption in a nordic perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 701-704, February.
    13. Joakim Haraldsson & Maria T. Johansson, 2019. "Energy Efficiency in the Supply Chains of the Aluminium Industry: The Cases of Five Products Made in Sweden," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sgouridis, Sgouris & Ali, Mohamed & Sleptchenko, Andrei & Bouabid, Ali & Ospina, Gustavo, 2021. "Aluminum smelters in the energy transition: Optimal configuration and operation for renewable energy integration in high insolation regions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 937-953.
    2. Alessandro Franco & Lorenzo Miserocchi & Daniele Testi, 2023. "Energy Indicators for Enabling Energy Transition in Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johnsson, Simon & Andersson, Elias & Thollander, Patrik & Karlsson, Magnus, 2019. "Energy savings and greenhouse gas mitigation potential in the Swedish wood industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. Accordini, D. & Cagno, E. & Trianni, A., 2021. "Identification and characterization of decision-making factors over industrial energy efficiency measures in electric motor systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Kubule, Anna & Ločmelis, Kristaps & Blumberga, Dagnija, 2020. "Analysis of the results of national energy audit program in Latvia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    4. Trianni, Andrea & Cagno, Enrico & Farné, Stefano, 2016. "Barriers, drivers and decision-making process for industrial energy efficiency: A broad study among manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1537-1551.
    5. Daniela Artemisa Calu & Adriana Ana Maria Davidescu & Alina Mihaela Irimescu & Corina-Graziella Batca Dumitru & Viorel Avram, 2023. "Implementation of Energy Efficiency Improvement Measures in Romania and the Role of Professional Accountants," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(63), pages 479-479, April.
    6. Andersson, Elias & Karlsson, Magnus & Thollander, Patrik & Paramonova, Svetlana, 2018. "Energy end-use and efficiency potentials among Swedish industrial small and medium-sized enterprises – A dataset analysis from the national energy audit program," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 165-177.
    7. Andrea Trianni & Davide Accordini & Enrico Cagno, 2020. "Identification and Categorization of Factors Affecting the Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures within Compressed Air Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-51, October.
    8. Werner König & Sabine Löbbe & Stefan Büttner & Christian Schneider, 2020. "Establishing Energy Efficiency—Drivers for Energy Efficiency in German Manufacturing Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-31, October.
    9. Therese Nehler, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Review of Methods for Improved Utilisation of the Non-Energy Benefits of Industrial Energy Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-27, November.
    10. Krutwig Michael C. & Tanțău Adrian, 2018. "Obligatory versus voluntary energy audits: are there differences in quality?," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 522-532, May.
    11. Dhayaneswaran, Y. & Ashok Kumar, L., 2014. "A study on current characteristics of induction motor while operating at its base frequency in textile industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 340-345.
    12. Alexander Melnik & Kirill Ermolaev, 2020. "Strategy Context of Decision Making for Improved Energy Efficiency in Industrial Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, March.
    13. Outcault, Sarah & Sanguinetti, Angela & Nelson, Leslie, 2022. "Technology characteristics that influence adoption of residential distributed energy resources: Adapting Rogers’ framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    14. Josefine Rasmussen, 2020. "The Role of Structural Context in Making Business Sense of Investments for Sustainability–A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-25, August.
    15. Palamutcu, S., 2010. "Electric energy consumption in the cotton textile processing stages," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 2945-2952.
    16. Shi, Yingying & Zeng, Yongchao & Engo, Jean & Han, Botang & Li, Yang & Muehleisen, Ralph T., 2020. "Leveraging inter-firm influence in the diffusion of energy efficiency technologies: An agent-based model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    17. Shveta Soam & Pål Börjesson, 2020. "Considerations on Potentials, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Performance of Biofuels Based on Forest Residues for Heavy-Duty Road Transport in Sweden," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Bandeiras, F. & Gomes, M. & Coelho, P. & Fernandes, J., 2020. "Towards net zero energy in industrial and commercial buildings in Portugal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    19. Cagno, Enrico & Accordini, Davide & Trianni, Andrea & Katic, Mile & Ferrari, Nicolò & Gambaro, Federico, 2022. "Understanding the impacts of energy efficiency measures on a Company’s operational performance: A new framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    20. Olsthoorn, Mark & Schleich, Joachim & Hirzel, Simon, 2017. "Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures for Non-residential Buildings: Technological and Organizational Heterogeneity in the Trade, Commerce and Services Sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 240-254.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3571-:d:575620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.