IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i12p3462-d573261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classification Trees in the Assessment of the Road–Railway Accidents Mortality

Author

Listed:
  • Edward Kozłowski

    (Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 38, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

  • Anna Borucka

    (Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Military University of Technology, ul. gen. Sylwestra Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Andrzej Świderski

    (Motor Transport Institute, ul. Jagiellońska 80, 03-301 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Przemysław Skoczyński

    (Motor Transport Institute, ul. Jagiellońska 80, 03-301 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

A special element of road safety research is accidents at the interface of the road and rail system. Due to their low share in the total number of incidents, they are not a popular subject of analyses but rather an element of collective studies, whereas the specificity of the road–rail accidents requires a separate characteristic, allowing, on the one hand, to categorize these types of incidents, and on the other, to specify the factors that affect them, along with an assessment of the strength of this impact. It is important to include in such analyses all potential predictors, both qualitative and quantitative. Moreover, the literature considers most often a number of accidents while, according to the authors, it does not fully reflect the scale of the danger. A better evaluation would be the victim’s degree of injury. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to assess the likelihood of occurrence of various effects of road–rail accidents in the aspect of selected factors. Due to the ordinal form of the dependent variable, the classification trees method was used. The results obtained not only allow the characterization and assessment of the danger but also constitute guidelines for taking preventive actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward Kozłowski & Anna Borucka & Andrzej Świderski & Przemysław Skoczyński, 2021. "Classification Trees in the Assessment of the Road–Railway Accidents Mortality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3462-:d:573261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3462/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3462/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rungskunroch, Panrawee & Jack, Anson & Kaewunruen, Sakdirat, 2021. "Benchmarking on railway safety performance using Bayesian inference, decision tree and petri-net techniques based on long-term accidental data sets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. G. V. Kass, 1980. "An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 29(2), pages 119-127, June.
    3. Aleksandar Blagojević & Sandra Kasalica & Željko Stević & Goran Tričković & Vesna Pavelkić, 2021. "Evaluation of Safety Degree at Railway Crossings in Order to Achieve Sustainable Traffic Management: A Novel Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Strobl, Carolin & Boulesteix, Anne-Laure & Augustin, Thomas, 2007. "Unbiased split selection for classification trees based on the Gini Index," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 483-501, September.
    2. I. Albarrán & P. Alonso-González & J. M. Marin, 2017. "Some criticism to a general model in Solvency II: an explanation from a clustering point of view," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1289-1308, June.
    3. Yousaf Muhammad & Dey Sandeep Kumar, 2022. "Best proxy to determine firm performance using financial ratios: A CHAID approach," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 22(3), pages 219-239, September.
    4. Archana R. Panhalkar & Dharmpal D. Doye, 2020. "An approach of improving decision tree classifier using condensed informative data," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 47(4), pages 431-445, December.
    5. Bas Donkers & Richard Paap & Jedid‐Jah Jonker & Philip Hans Franses, 2006. "Deriving target selection rules from endogenously selected samples," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(5), pages 549-562, July.
    6. Lea Piscitelli & Annalisa De Boni & Rocco Roma & Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano, 2023. "Carbon Farming: How to Support Farmers in Choosing the Best Management Strategies for Low-Impact Food Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Böyükaslan, Adem & Ecer, Fatih, 2021. "Determination of drivers for investing in cryptocurrencies through a fuzzy full consistency method-Bonferroni (FUCOM-F’B) framework," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. H Seol & H Lee & S Kim & Y Park, 2008. "The impact of information technology on organizational efficiency in public services: a DEA-based DT approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(2), pages 231-238, February.
    9. Vanhoucke, Mario & Maenhout, Broos, 2009. "On the characterization and generation of nurse scheduling problem instances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 457-467, July.
    10. Todor Krastevich, 2013. "Using Predictive Modeling to Improve Direct Marketing Performance," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 25-55.
    11. Wei, Xiupeng & Kusiak, Andrew & Li, Mingyang & Tang, Fan & Zeng, Yaohui, 2015. "Multi-objective optimization of the HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) system performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 294-306.
    12. Adrien Ehrhardt & Christophe Biernacki & Vincent Vandewalle & Philippe Heinrich, 2019. "Feature quantization for parsimonious and interpretable predictive models," Papers 1903.08920, arXiv.org.
    13. Onur Doğan & Hakan Aşan & Ejder Ayç, 2015. "Use Of Data Mining Techniques In Advance Decision Making Processes In A Local Firm," European Journal of Business and Economics, Central Bohemia University, vol. 10(2), pages 6821:10-682, January.
    14. Jae-Dong Kim & Tae-Hyeong Kim & Sung Won Han, 2023. "Demand Forecasting of Spare Parts Using Artificial Intelligence: A Case Study of K-X Tanks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-10, January.
    15. Agapito, Dora & Mendes, Julio & Valle, Patricia, 2011. "The Sea as a Connection between Residents and Tourists in Coastal Destinations: A Case in Algarve," Spatial and Organizational Dynamics Discussion Papers 2011-13, CIEO-Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, University of Algarve.
    16. Francisco Javier Rondán-Cataluña & Patricio E. Ramírez-Correa & Jorge Arenas-Gaitán & Muriel Ramírez-Santana & Elizabeth E. Grandón & Jorge Alfaro-Pérez, 2020. "Social Network Communications in Chilean Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, August.
    17. Timmins, Christopher & Vissing, Ashley, 2022. "Environmental justice and Coasian bargaining: The role of race, ethnicity, and income in lease negotiations for shale gas," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    18. A. Israëls & J. Driel, 1983. "Use of the chi-square statistic for selecting explanatory variables in multiway tables," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 103-116, April.
    19. Nocella, Giuseppe & Stefani, Gianluca & Romano, Donato, 2011. "Preferences, trust and willingness to pay for food information: An analysis of the Italian Market," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114606, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Auld, Joshua & Mohammadian, Abolfazl (Kouros) & Doherty, Sean T., 2009. "Modeling activity conflict resolution strategies using scheduling process data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 386-400, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3462-:d:573261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.