IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i14p3600-d383781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Consumption and CO 2 Emissions of Coach Stations in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xuejing Zheng

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
    Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Boxiao Xu

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Shijun You

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
    Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Huan Zhang

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
    Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Yaran Wang

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Leizhai Sun

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

Abstract

As a critical transportation infrastructure, with a high flow of people and high-energy consumption in China, coach stations have great potential in energy saving and CO 2 emission reduction. In this paper, the building information and energy consumption data of 29 coach stations in five climate regions of China were obtained by field investigations. The annual total comprehensive building energy consumption was 31.37–128.08 kWh/(m 2 ·a). The annual total CO 2 emissions from building operation in the coach stations was 17.01–134.77 kgCO 2 /(m 2 ·a). The heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system was the largest energy using and CO 2 emissions sector: 30.42–72.47% of the energy consumption and 30.42–83.93% of the CO 2 emissions were generated by HVAC system. The energy consumption and CO 2 emission level of coach stations and that of other kinds of public buildings were compared. Results showed that the energy consumption and CO 2 emission levels of coach stations investigated were relatively low, mainly because the passenger thermal comfort was scarified. Based on the investigation data, energy consumption analysis models of coach stations in five regions were established by simulation when the passenger thermal comfort was met. The potentials of energy saving and CO 2 emission reduction were studied from forms of the HVAC system, heat recovery and natural illumination.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuejing Zheng & Boxiao Xu & Shijun You & Huan Zhang & Yaran Wang & Leizhai Sun, 2020. "Energy Consumption and CO 2 Emissions of Coach Stations in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:14:p:3600-:d:383781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/14/3600/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/14/3600/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lu, Mengxue & Lai, Joseph, 2020. "Review on carbon emissions of commercial buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. A.M. Fogheri, 2015. "Energy Efficiency in Public Buildings," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3-4, pages 763-784.
    3. Yan, Junna & Su, Bin, 2020. "What drive the changes in China's energy consumption and intensity during 12th Five-Year Plan period?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Zhang, Yang & Yan, Da & Hu, Shan & Guo, Siyue, 2019. "Modelling of energy consumption and carbon emission from the building construction sector in China, a process-based LCA approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Dong & Tongyu Qin & Siyuan Zhou & Lu Huang & Rui Bo & Haibo Guo & Xunzhi Yin, 2020. "Comparative Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction Performance of Reinforced Concrete and Timber Stadiums—A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Zhu, Bangzhu & Su, Bin & Li, Yingzhu & Ng, Tsan Sheng, 2020. "Embodied energy and intensity in China’s (normal and processing) exports and their driving forces, 2005-2015," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Leurent, Martin & Jasserand, Frédéric & Locatelli, Giorgio & Palm, Jenny & Rämä, Miika & Trianni, Andrea, 2017. "Driving forces and obstacles to nuclear cogeneration in Europe: Lessons learnt from Finland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 138-150.
    4. Rao, Congjun & Zhang, Yue & Wen, Jianghui & Xiao, Xinping & Goh, Mark, 2023. "Energy demand forecasting in China: A support vector regression-compositional data second exponential smoothing model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    5. Tong, Zheming & Chen, Yujiao & Malkawi, Ali & Liu, Zhu & Freeman, Richard B., 2016. "Energy saving potential of natural ventilation in China: The impact of ambient air pollution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 660-668.
    6. Hui Li & Yanan Zheng & Guan Gong & Hongtao Guo, 2023. "A Simulation Study on Peak Carbon Emission of Public Buildings—In the Case of Henan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Alhamwi, Alaa & Medjroubi, Wided & Vogt, Thomas & Agert, Carsten, 2018. "Modelling urban energy requirements using open source data and models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1100-1108.
    8. Liu, Jia & Chen, Xi & Yang, Hongxing & Li, Yutong, 2020. "Energy storage and management system design optimization for a photovoltaic integrated low-energy building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. Li, Honglian & Huang, Jin & Hu, Yao & Wang, Shangyu & Liu, Jing & Yang, Liu, 2021. "A new TMY generation method based on the entropy-based TOPSIS theory for different climatic zones in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Yu, Jinghua & Leng, Kangxin & Ye, Hong & Xu, Xinhua & Luo, Yongqiang & Wang, Jinbo & Yang, Xie & Yang, Qingchen & Gang, Wenjie, 2020. "Study on thermal insulation characteristics and optimized design of pipe-embedded ventilation roof with outer-layer shape-stabilized PCM in different climate zones," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1609-1622.
    11. Ranka Gajić & Darinka Golubović-Matić & Biserka Mitrović & Svetlana Batarilo & Milena Kordić, 2021. "The Methodology for Supporting Land Use Management in Collective Housing towards Achieving Energy Efficiency: A Case Study of New Belgrade, Serbia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Ahn, Jonghoon & Cho, Soolyeon & Chung, Dae Hun, 2016. "Development of a statistical analysis model to benchmark the energy use intensity of subway stations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 488-496.
    13. Zhaocheng Li & Yu Song, 2022. "Energy Consumption Linkages of the Chinese Construction Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, February.
    14. Zhang, Wei & Wang, Nan, 2021. "Decomposition of energy intensity in Chinese industries using an extended LMDI method of production element endowment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    15. Shiying Li & Jae-Weon Jeong, 2018. "Energy Performance of Liquid Desiccant and Evaporative Cooling-Assisted 100% Outdoor Air Systems under Various Climatic Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Su, Bin & Ang, B.W., 2020. "Demand contributors and driving factors of Singapore’s aggregate carbon intensities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    17. Shilei Lu & Minchao Fan & Yiqun Zhao, 2018. "A System to Pre-Evaluate the Suitability of Energy-Saving Technology for Green Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Li, Dezhi & Huang, Guanying & Zhu, Shiyao & Chen, Long & Wang, Jiangbo, 2021. "How to peak carbon emissions of provincial construction industry? Scenario analysis of Jiangsu Province," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Lachlan Curmi & Kumudu Kaushalya Weththasinghe & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq, 2022. "Global Policy Review on Embodied Flows: Recommendations for Australian Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Droutsa, Kalliopi G. & Kontoyiannidis, Simon & Dascalaki, Elena G. & Balaras, Constantinos A., 2016. "Mapping the energy performance of hellenic residential buildings from EPC (energy performance certificate) data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 284-295.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:14:p:3600-:d:383781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.