IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i9p849-d629478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Profit for Pasture-Based Beef Cattle and Sheep Farming Using Linear Programming: Young Beef Cattle Production in New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Addisu H. Addis

    (Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
    Applied Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar P.O. Box 196, Ethiopia)

  • Hugh T. Blair

    (Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand)

  • Paul R. Kenyon

    (Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand)

  • Stephen T. Morris

    (Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand)

  • Nicola M. Schreurs

    (Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand)

Abstract

In New Zealand, surplus dairy-origin calves not needed as replacement or for beef cattle farms requirements for finishing are commercially slaughtered within two weeks of age. This system has perceived ethical issues which can potentially negatively affect the dairy industry. Therefore, a young beef cattle production system to maximize the use of excess calves within the land size constraint is considered as an alternative to a traditional 18 to 33-months slaughtering system. The current study examined the effects of young beef cattle production with slaughter ages at 8 to 14 months on pasture utilization, farm profitability and selling policy on class 5, intensive finishing sheep and beef cattle farms in New Zealand. A linear programming model that had previously been developed for this farm class (optimized traditional beef cattle system) was modified to include a young beef cattle slaughter system and identified the carrying capacity for young and traditional beef cattle and the selling policy required to optimize pasture utilization and farm profitability. Systems with young beef cattle slaughtered at 8, 10, 12 or 14-months of age were simulated without (Scenario I) or with (Scenario II) decreasing the number of traditional beef cattle. Daily per head energy demand for maintenance and live weight change was estimated and converted to kg DM/head on a bimonthly basis. Carcasses from young beef cattle were processed as one class under manufacturing beef price (NZ$4.50). The modified young and traditional beef cattle slaughtering system maintained an extra 6% and 35% beef cattle in Scenario I and Scenario II respectively, and finished 90% and 84% of traditional beef cattle before the second winter. Pasture supplied 98% of the feed demand for the beef cattle activities and 79–83% of that was consumed. Mixed young and traditional beef cattle finishing scenarios returned 2% less gross farm revenue per hectare (GFR/ha). However, earnings before tax per hectare (ETB/ha) in Scenario I and Scenario II were 15–25% greater than that of the optimized traditional beef cattle system, respectively. Young beef cattle production increased pasture utilization and farm profitability and increased selling options for finished beef cattle. Therefore, the young beef cattle system is a viable option for farmers and will help to reduce the need to slaughter calves within two weeks of age.

Suggested Citation

  • Addisu H. Addis & Hugh T. Blair & Paul R. Kenyon & Stephen T. Morris & Nicola M. Schreurs, 2021. "Optimization of Profit for Pasture-Based Beef Cattle and Sheep Farming Using Linear Programming: Young Beef Cattle Production in New Zealand," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:9:p:849-:d:629478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/9/849/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/9/849/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Addisu H. Addis & Hugh T. Blair & Paul R. Kenyon & Stephen T. Morris & Nicola M. Schreurs, 2021. "Optimization of Profit for Pasture-Based Beef Cattle and Sheep Farming Using Linear Programming: Model Development and Evaluation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Conway, A. G. & Killen, L., 1987. "A linear programming model of grassland management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 51-71.
    3. Herron, Jonathan & Curran, Thomas P. & Moloney, Aidan P. & O'Brien, Donal, 2019. "Whole farm modelling the effect of grass silage harvest date and nitrogen fertiliser rate on nitrous oxide emissions from grass-based suckler to beef farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 66-78.
    4. van Selm, Benjamin & de Boer, Imke J.M. & Ledgard, Stewart F. & van Middelaar, Corina E., 2021. "Reducing greenhouse gas emissions of New Zealand beef through better integration of dairy and beef production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    5. Farrell, L.J. & Tozer, P.R. & Kenyon, P.R. & Ramilan, T. & Cranston, L.M., 2019. "The effect of ewe wastage in New Zealand sheep and beef farms on flock productivity and farm profitability," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 125-132.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Addisu H. Addis & Hugh T. Blair & Paul R. Kenyon & Stephen T. Morris & Nicola M. Schreurs & Dorian J. Garrick, 2023. "Agent-Based Modelling to Improve Beef Production from Dairy Cattle: Young Beef Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Addisu H. Addis & Hugh T. Blair & Paul R. Kenyon & Stephen T. Morris & Nicola M. Schreurs & Dorian J. Garrick, 2022. "Agent-Based Modeling to Improve Beef Production from Dairy Cattle: Model Description and Evaluation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-10, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kearney, M. & O'Riordan, E.G. & Byrne, N. & Breen, J. & Crosson, P., 2023. "Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in pasture-based dairy-beef production systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Addisu H. Addis & Hugh T. Blair & Paul R. Kenyon & Stephen T. Morris & Nicola M. Schreurs & Dorian J. Garrick, 2022. "Agent-Based Modeling to Improve Beef Production from Dairy Cattle: Model Description and Evaluation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Addisu H. Addis & Hugh T. Blair & Paul R. Kenyon & Stephen T. Morris & Nicola M. Schreurs, 2021. "Optimization of Profit for Pasture-Based Beef Cattle and Sheep Farming Using Linear Programming: Model Development and Evaluation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Stelios Rozakis & Alexandra Sintori & Konstantinos Tsiboukas, 2009. "Utility-derived Supply Function of Sheep Milk: The Case of Etoloakarnania, Greece," Working Papers 2009-11, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    5. Herrero, M. & Fawcett, R. H. & Dent, J. B., 1999. "Bio-economic evaluation of dairy farm management scenarios using integrated simulation and multiple-criteria models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 169-188, December.
    6. James Chege Wangui & Paul R. Kenyon & Peter R. Tozer & James P. Millner & Sarah J. Pain, 2021. "Bioeconomic Modelling to Assess the Impacts of Using Native Shrubs on the Marginal Portions of the Sheep and Beef Hill Country Farms in New Zealand," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Finger, Robert & Lazzarotto, Patrick & Calanca, Pierluigi, 2010. "Bio-economic assessment of climate change impacts on managed grassland production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(9), pages 666-674, November.
    8. Farrell, L.J. & Kenyon, P.R. & Tozer, P.R. & Ramilan, T. & Cranston, L.M., 2020. "Quantifying sheep enterprise profitability with varying flock replacement rates, lambing rates, and breeding strategies in New Zealand," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    9. Kearney, M. & O'Riordan, E.G. & McGee, M. & Breen, J. & Crosson, P., 2022. "Farm-level modelling of bioeconomic, greenhouse gas emissions and feed-food performance of pasture-based dairy-beef systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    10. Girard, N. & Hubert, B., 1999. "Modelling expert knowledge with knowledge-based systems to design decision aids : The example of a knowledge-based model on grazing management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 123-144, February.
    11. McGee, M. & Moloney, A.P. & O'Riordan, E.G. & Regan, M. & Lenehan, C. & Kelly, A.K. & Crosson, P., 2023. "Pasture-finishing of late-maturing bulls or steers in a suckler calf-to-beef system: Animal production, meat quality, economics, greenhouse gas emissions and human-edible food-feed efficiency," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    12. Sintori, Alexandra & Rozakis, Stelios & Tsiboukas, Kostas, 2009. "Multiple goals in farmers’ decision making: The case of sheep farming in Western Greece," 83rd Annual Conference, March 30 - April 1, 2009, Dublin, Ireland 51075, Agricultural Economics Society.
    13. Lydia J. Farrell & Stephen T. Morris & Paul R. Kenyon & Peter R. Tozer, 2021. "Simulating Beef Cattle Herd Productivity with Varying Cow Liveweight and Fixed Feed Supply," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Crosson, P. & O'Kiely, P. & O'Mara, F.P. & Wallace, M., 2006. "The development of a mathematical model to investigate Irish beef production systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 89(2-3), pages 349-370, September.
    15. Lydia J. Farrell & Paul R. Kenyon & Stephen T. Morris & Peter R. Tozer, 2020. "The Impact of Hogget and Mature Flock Reproductive Success on Sheep Farm Productivity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:9:p:849-:d:629478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.