IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviy2023i1p94-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Training Employees in Sustainability and Assessing their Ability to Implement Bottom-up Changes in Companies for the Green Revolution – A Comparative Analysis in Poland and India

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa Kupczyk
  • Elwira Gross-Golacka
  • Joanna Kubicka

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to identify and analyze the opinions of employees from Poland and India on the sustainability training they have received. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study was conducted based on a survey questionnaire, the preparation of which was preceded by preliminary research. The study involved 497 employees of companies from Poland and India. The results of the study were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U test. Associations between variables were analyzed using the chi^2 test, as well as estimating Spearman's and Kendall's rank correlation coefficients. Findings: The opinions of employees regarding participation in training courses on sustainability and the possibility of grassroots implementation of changes for the green revolution were determined using the example of companies from Poland and India. According to their opinions, there is not enough of these trainings and they have negligible opportunities to implement changes from below. A significant relationship was identified between the number of trainings received by employees on sustainability and their assessment of the sustainability of their company's operations. Practical implication: The results of the study can support managers responsible for sustainability in companies. This is because they will allow them to better recognize how employees evaluate the sustainability training offered to them and their ability to implement changes in their companies from the bottom up for the green revolution. Originality/value: It was found that in India, employees participate in significantly more training than in Poland on sustainability and have more opportunities to implement changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Kupczyk & Elwira Gross-Golacka & Joanna Kubicka, 2023. "Training Employees in Sustainability and Assessing their Ability to Implement Bottom-up Changes in Companies for the Green Revolution – A Comparative Analysis in Poland and India," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 94-107.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvi:y:2023:i:1:p:94-107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3099/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Waseem Ahmad & Colin Soskolne & Tanvir Ahmed, 2012. "Strategic thinking on sustainability: challenges and sectoral roles," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 67-83, February.
    2. Robert B. Gibson, 2006. "Beyond The Pillars: Sustainability Assessment As A Framework For Effective Integration Of Social, Economic And Ecological Considerations In Significant Decision-Making," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(03), pages 259-280.
    3. Nilsson, Måns & Persson, Åsa, 2012. "Reprint of “Can Earth system interactions be governed? Governance functions for linking climate change mitigation with land use, freshwater and biodiversity protection”," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 10-20.
    4. Nilsson, Måns & Persson, Åsa, 2012. "Can Earth system interactions be governed? Governance functions for linking climate change mitigation with land use, freshwater and biodiversity protection," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 61-71.
    5. Therese Fagerlind & Martin Stefanicki & Andreas Feldmann & Jouni Korhonen, 2019. "The Distribution of Sustainable Decision-Making in Multinational Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Harsha Sarvaiya & Gabriel Eweje & Jim Arrowsmith, 2018. "The Roles of HRM in CSR: Strategic Partnership or Operational Support?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 825-837, December.
    7. Yu, Wantao & Chavez, Roberto & Feng, Mengying & Wong, Chee Yew & Fynes, Brian, 2020. "Green human resource management and environmental cooperation: An ability-motivation-opportunity and contingency perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 224-235.
    8. Rakesh D. Raut & Bhaskar Gardas & Sunil Luthra & Balkrishna Narkhede & Sachin Kumar Mangla, 2020. "Analysing green human resource management indicators of automotive service sector," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(7), pages 925-944, February.
    9. Frances Drake & Martin Purvis & Jane Hunt, 2004. "Meeting the environmental challenge: a case of win–win or lose–win? A study of the UK baking and refrigeration industries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 172-186, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teresa Kupczyk & Andrzej Wiatrak & Elwira Gross-Golacka & Joanna Kubicka, 2022. "Evaluation of Corporate Sustainability Strategies and Practices in this Area in the Opinion of Employees – A Comparative Analysis in Poland and India," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 308-322.
    2. Frantzeskaki, Niki & Buchel, Sophie & Spork, Charlie & Ludwig, Kathrin & Kok, Marcel T.J., 2019. "The Multiple Roles of ICLEI: Intermediating to Innovate Urban Biodiversity Governance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Agata Gurzawska & Markus Mäkinen & Philip Brey, 2017. "Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Practices in Industry: Providing the Right Incentives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Michelle Scobie, 2018. "Accountability in climate change governance and Caribbean SIDS," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 769-787, April.
    5. Galaz, Victor & Biermann, Frank & Folke, Carl & Nilsson, Måns & Olsson, Per, 2012. "Global environmental governance and planetary boundaries: An introduction," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-3.
    6. Brian G. Fitzgerald & Travis O'Doherty & Richard Moles & Bernadette O'Regan, 2015. "Quantitative Evaluation of Settlement Sustainability Policy (QESSP); Forward Planning for 26 Irish Settlements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Xuemei Bai & Syezlin Hasan & Lauren Seaby Andersen & Anders Bjørn & Şiir Kilkiş & Daniel Ospina & Jianguo Liu & Sarah E. Cornell & Oscar Sabag Muñoz & Ariane Bremond & Beatrice Crona & Fabrice DeClerc, 2024. "Translating Earth system boundaries for cities and businesses," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(2), pages 108-119, February.
    8. Vaissière, Anne-Charlotte & Levrel, Harold & Pioch, Sylvain & Carlier, Antoine, 2014. "Biodiversity offsets for offshore wind farm projects: The current situation in Europe," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 172-183.
    9. Kamalakanta Muduli & Simonov Kusi-Sarpong & Devendra K. Yadav & Himanshu Gupta & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour, 2021. "An original assessment of the influence of soft dimensions on implementation of sustainability practices: implications for the thermal energy sector in fast growing economies," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 337-358, December.
    10. Dona Azizi, 0. "Access and allocation in food governance, a decadal view 2008–2018," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    11. Christian Voegtlin & Andreas Georg Scherer, 2017. "Responsible Innovation and the Innovation of Responsibility: Governing Sustainable Development in a Globalized World," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 227-243, June.
    12. Ashton, Lisa, 2022. "A framework for promoting natural climate solutions in the agriculture sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    13. Saqib Yaqoob Malik & Yasir Hayat Mughal & Tamoor Azam & Yukun Cao & Zhifang WAN & Hongge ZHU & Ramayah Thurasamy, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Human Resources Management, and Sustainable Performance: Is Organizational Citizenship Behavior towards Environment the Missing Link?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Verbruggen, Aviel, 2013. "Revocability and reversibility in societal decision-making," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 20-27.
    15. Christian Voegtlin & Andreas Georg Scherer & Günter K. Stahl & Olga Hawn, 2022. "Grand Societal Challenges and Responsible Innovation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 1-28, January.
    16. Anne-Charlotte Vaissière & Harold Levrel & Sylvain Pioch & Antoine Carlier, 2014. "Biodiversity offsets for offshore wind farm projects: The current situation in Europe," Post-Print hal-01692356, HAL.
    17. Christian Voegtlin & Andreas Georg Scherer & Günter K Stahl & Olga Hawn, 2022. "Grand Societal Challenges and Responsible Innovation," Post-Print hal-03466563, HAL.
    18. Dona Azizi, 2020. "Access and allocation in food governance, a decadal view 2008–2018," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 323-338, June.
    19. van Kerkhoff, Lorrae & Berry, Helen, 2016. "Serving the public good: Empirical links between governance and research investment in the context of global environmental change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 101-107.
    20. Abhilasha Singh & Apurva Shaurya, 2021. "Impact of Artificial Intelligence on HR practices in the UAE," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Training; sustainability; grassroots employee initiatives; green revolution.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvi:y:2023:i:1:p:94-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.