IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiiiy2020ispecial1p586-599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Selected European Cities’s Potentials to Influence the Formulation and Implementation of Logistics Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Maja Kiba-Janiak

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the article is a comparative analysis of the potentials of European Union (EU) capitals in the formulation and implementation of logistics strategies using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) multiple criteria decision making method. Approach/Methodology/Design: To compare the results obtained by capital cities in EU countries the multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) method – AHP was used. The basis of empirical research are the indicators used by the European Commission in Eurostat, including survey data on Urban Audit. Findings: As a result, cities were ranked based on their potential to formulate and implemente logistics strategies. Eight groups of cities with similar results emerged in the ranking. Helsinki had the highest potential while the weakest one is Athens. Research shows that cities that belong to countries that are so-called EU "old members" have higher potential in formulating and implementing logistics strategies than cities that belong to the so-called groups of "new members" of the EU. The exceptions are Athens and Lisbon. Practical Implications: The AHP method presented can significantly help local governments to formulate a logistics strategy. This method makes it possible to carry out a comparative analysis of the potentials of cities that influence logistic strategic decisions. As a result, it is possible to determine the position of a given city in comparison to others and indicate in which areas or in relation to which criteria a given city is better and which is worse. In addition, this method can be used to set priorities for urban logistics projects planned to be implemented and what is important can be done in groups. Originality/Value: The paper develops a group of criteria, which assist in analyzing the potential of the city in terms of logistics strategy formulation and implementation and in studying the results obtained with the use of multiple criteria decision making method AHP.

Suggested Citation

  • Maja Kiba-Janiak, 2020. "Comparative Analysis of Selected European Cities’s Potentials to Influence the Formulation and Implementation of Logistics Strategy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 586-599.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:special1:p:586-599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1779/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bjørgen, Astrid & Seter, Hanne & Kristensen, Terje & Pitera, Kelly, 2019. "The potential for coordinated logistics planning at the local level: A Norwegian in-depth study of public and private stakeholders," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 34-41.
    2. Dablanc, Laetitia, 2007. "Goods transport in large European cities: Difficult to organize, difficult to modernize," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 280-285, March.
    3. Justyna Winkowska & Danuta Szpilko, 2020. "Methodology for Integration of Smart City Dimensions in the Socialised Process of Creating City Development," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 524-547.
    4. Hickman, Robin & Hall, Peter & Banister, David, 2013. "Planning more for sustainable mobility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 210-219.
    5. Lindholm, Maria & Behrends, Sönke, 2012. "Challenges in urban freight transport planning – a review in the Baltic Sea Region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 129-136.
    6. Mozos-Blanco, Miguel Ángel & Pozo-Menéndez, Elisa & Arce-Ruiz, Rosa & Baucells-Aletà, Neus, 2018. "The way to sustainable mobility. A comparative analysis of sustainable mobility plans in Spain," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 45-54.
    7. Iwona Bak & Katarzyna Cheba & Irena Lacka, 2020. "Sustainable Development and Innovations- How They Work Together?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 93-113.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalia Wagner & Stanislaw Iwan & Kinga Kijewska, 2021. "The Assumptions, Conditions and Barriers of the Development of the Urban Consolidation Centre for Municipal Entities (UCC-ME)," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 806-821.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maja Kiba-Janiak & Jarosław Witkowski, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: How Do They Work?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Behiri, Walid & Belmokhtar-Berraf, Sana & Chu, Chengbin, 2018. "Urban freight transport using passenger rail network: Scientific issues and quantitative analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 227-245.
    3. Behrends, Sönke, 2017. "Burden or opportunity for modal shift? – Embracing the urban dimension of intermodal road-rail transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 10-16.
    4. Radoje Vujadinović & Jelena Šaković Jovanović & Aljaž Plevnik & Luka Mladenovič & Tom Rye, 2021. "Key Challenges in the Status Analysis for the Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan in Podgorica, Montenegro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, January.
    5. Vidal Vieira, José Geraldo & Fransoo, Jan C., 2015. "How logistics performance of freight operators is affected by urban freight distribution issues," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 37-47.
    6. Sijing Liu & Jiuping Xu & Xiaoyuan Shi & Guoqi Li & Dinglong Liu, 2018. "Sustainable Distribution Organization Based on the Supply–Demand Coordination in Large Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Veronika Harantová & Alica Kalašová & Simona Kubíková, 2021. "Use of Traffic Planning Software Outputs When a New Highway Section Is Put into Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Giulio Mario Cappelletti & Luca Grilli & Carlo Russo & Domenico Santoro, 2023. "Benchmarking Sustainable Mobility in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, March.
    9. Jacek Oskarbski & Daniel Kaszubowski, 2018. "Applying a Mesoscopic Transport Model to Analyse the Effects of Urban Freight Regulatory Measures on Transport Emissions—An Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Jianjun Dong & Yuanxian Xu & Bon-gang Hwang & Rui Ren & Zhilong Chen, 2019. "The Impact of Underground Logistics System on Urban Sustainable Development: A System Dynamics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Francesco Ciardiello & Andrea Genovese & Shucheng Luo & Antonino Sgalambro, 2023. "A game-theoretic multi-stakeholder model for cost allocation in urban consolidation centres," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 663-686, May.
    12. Akgün, Emine Zehra & Monios, Jason & Rye, Tom & Fonzone, Achille, 2019. "Influences on urban freight transport policy choice by local authorities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 88-98.
    13. Priscila Pereira Suzart Carvalho & Ricardo Araújo Kalid & Jorge Laureano Moya Rodríguez & Sandro Breval Santiago, 2019. "Interactions among stakeholders in the processes of city logistics: a systematic review of the literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(2), pages 567-607, August.
    14. Lindawati & Johan van Schagen & Mark Goh & Robert de Souza, 2014. "Collaboration in urban logistics: motivations and barriers," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 278-290, July.
    15. Vieira, José Geraldo Vidal & Fransoo, Jan C. & Carvalho, Carla Deguirmendjian, 2015. "Freight distribution in megacities: Perspectives of shippers, logistics service providers and carriers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 46-54.
    16. Romanika Okraszewska & Aleksandra Romanowska & Marcin Wołek & Jacek Oskarbski & Krystian Birr & Kazimierz Jamroz, 2018. "Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Kinga Kijewska & João Guilherme Costa Braga França & Leise Kelli de Oliveira & Stanislaw Iwan, 2022. "Evaluation of Urban Mobility Problems and Freight Solutions from Residents’ Perspectives: A Comparison of Belo Horizonte (Brazil) and Szczecin (Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    18. Pedro A. P. Dias & Hugo Yoshizaki & Patricia Favero & Jose Geraldo Vidal Vieira, 2019. "Daytime or Overnight Deliveries? Perceptions of Drivers and Retailers in São Paulo City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Yang, Chao & Chen, Mingyang & Yuan, Quan, 2021. "The geography of freight-related accidents in the era of E-commerce: Evidence from the Los Angeles metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Daniele Crotti & Elena Maggi, 2023. "Social Responsibility and Urban Consolidation Centres in Sustainable Freight Transport Markets," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 9(2), pages 829-850, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    City logistics strategy; city potential; MCDM; AHP.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • R42 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government and Private Investment Analysis; Road Maintenance; Transportation Planning
    • R48 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government Pricing and Policy
    • P25 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:special1:p:586-599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.