IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i3p1037-d483646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Challenges in the Status Analysis for the Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan in Podgorica, Montenegro

Author

Listed:
  • Radoje Vujadinović

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

  • Jelena Šaković Jovanović

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

  • Aljaž Plevnik

    (Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Luka Mladenovič

    (Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Tom Rye

    (Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Faculty of Logistics, Molde University College, 6410 Molde, Norway)

Abstract

The paper presents the results of the application of a practical approach for collecting data, which provides a simple, cost efficient, and easily reproducible method that was applied to obtain the necessary data for the status analysis of the Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) for Podgorica, the capital of Montenegro. Important data for the estimation of the existing condition of the traffic system were collected through desk research from the appropriate institutions and organizations. Several surveys and focus group interviews were conducted, in which about 5000 residents of Podgorica participated. In addition to answering questions, residents made numerous suggestions, confirming the correctness of a participatory approach in the new traffic planning paradigm that provides the SUMP with crucial advantages. A manual cordon count of traffic on five bridges for the traffic of the motor vehicles, as well as on two pedestrian-only bridges, was performed by students from the study program Road Traffic, and there are plans to repeat this in the coming years in order to enable more reliable monitoring and evaluation of the obtained data. Contemporary quality management tools such as BYPAD and ParkPAD were also used to assess the status of cycling and parking policy, respectively. It is especially important to emphasize that Podgorica is the first city in the West Balkans, and the fourth city in Europe, in which the ParkPAD tool was applied. A wide range of negative phenomena and trends was identified, like a rapid increase in the number of registered vehicles, an increase in the motorization rate and the number of traffic accidents, increased non-compliance with traffic rules, excessive use of passenger cars and auto-taxi vehicles, insufficient use of unattractive public transport, walking and cycling, etc. Based on the data collected, key challenges in status analysis in Podgorica were identified, which the SUMP should try to overcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Radoje Vujadinović & Jelena Šaković Jovanović & Aljaž Plevnik & Luka Mladenovič & Tom Rye, 2021. "Key Challenges in the Status Analysis for the Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan in Podgorica, Montenegro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1037-:d:483646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1037/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1037/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mojca Balant & Marjan Lep, 2020. "Comprehensive Traffic Calming as a Key Element of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans—Impacts of a Neighbourhood Redesign in Ljutomer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Malene Freudendal-Pedersen & Sven Kesselring & Eriketti Servou, 2019. "What is Smart for the Future City? Mobilities and Automation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Romanika Okraszewska & Aleksandra Romanowska & Marcin Wołek & Jacek Oskarbski & Krystian Birr & Kazimierz Jamroz, 2018. "Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Curiel-Esparza, Jorge & Mazario-Diez, Julio L. & Canto-Perello, Julian & Martin-Utrillas, Manuel, 2016. "Prioritization by consensus of enhancements for sustainable mobility in urban areas," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(P1), pages 248-257.
    5. Ralph Buehler & John Pucher & Regine Gerike & Thomas Götschi, 2017. "Reducing car dependence in the heart of Europe: lessons from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 4-28, January.
    6. Erling Holden & Geoffrey Gilpin & David Banister, 2019. "Sustainable Mobility at Thirty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Diez, Jose Maria & Lopez-Lambas, Maria Eugenia & Gonzalo, Hernán & Rojo, Marta & Garcia-Martinez, Andres, 2018. "Methodology for assessing the cost effectiveness of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs). The case of the city of Burgos," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 22-30.
    8. Hickman, Robin & Hall, Peter & Banister, David, 2013. "Planning more for sustainable mobility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 210-219.
    9. Ana Louro & Nuno Marques da Costa & Eduarda Marques da Costa, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Mobility Policies as a Path to Healthy Cities—The Case Study of LMA, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-32, May.
    10. Tiziana Campisi & Nurten Akgün & Dario Ticali & Giovanni Tesoriere, 2020. "Exploring Public Opinion on Personal Mobility Vehicle Use: A Case Study in Palermo, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Maja Kiba-Janiak & Jarosław Witkowski, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: How Do They Work?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Mozos-Blanco, Miguel Ángel & Pozo-Menéndez, Elisa & Arce-Ruiz, Rosa & Baucells-Aletà, Neus, 2018. "The way to sustainable mobility. A comparative analysis of sustainable mobility plans in Spain," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 45-54.
    13. Stefan Werland, 2020. "Diffusing Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning in the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Banister, David, 2008. "The sustainable mobility paradigm," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 73-80, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gülay Demir & Milanko Damjanović & Boško Matović & Radoje Vujadinović, 2022. "Toward Sustainable Urban Mobility by Using Fuzzy-FUCOM and Fuzzy-CoCoSo Methods: The Case of the SUMP Podgorica," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, April.
    2. Oz Sahin & Edoardo Bertone, 2022. "Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems (SDEWES)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-4, October.
    3. Nikoleta Mikušová & Gabriel Fedorko & Vieroslav Molnár & Martina Hlatká & Rudolf Kampf & Veronika Sirková, 2021. "Possibility of a Solution of the Sustainability of Transport and Mobility with the Application of Discrete Computer Simulation—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maja Kiba-Janiak & Jarosław Witkowski, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: How Do They Work?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Uroš Kramar & Dejan Dragan & Darja Topolšek, 2019. "The Holistic Approach to Urban Mobility Planning with a Modified Focus Group, SWOT, and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-29, November.
    3. Giulio Mario Cappelletti & Luca Grilli & Carlo Russo & Domenico Santoro, 2023. "Benchmarking Sustainable Mobility in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Mojca Balant & Marjan Lep, 2020. "Comprehensive Traffic Calming as a Key Element of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans—Impacts of a Neighbourhood Redesign in Ljutomer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Gülay Demir & Milanko Damjanović & Boško Matović & Radoje Vujadinović, 2022. "Toward Sustainable Urban Mobility by Using Fuzzy-FUCOM and Fuzzy-CoCoSo Methods: The Case of the SUMP Podgorica," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, April.
    6. Fernández-González, Raquel & Pérez-Vas, Raisa & Puime-Guillén, Félix, 2022. "Small companies facing the mobility policy in Spain: Is it profitable to remain in the market?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 113-120.
    7. Tom Rye & Robert Hrelja, 2020. "Policies for Reducing Car Traffic and Their Problematisation. Lessons from the Mobility Strategies of British, Dutch, German and Swedish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, October.
    8. Marco Mazzarino & Lucio Rubini, 2019. "Smart Urban Planning: Evaluating Urban Logistics Performance of Innovative Solutions and Sustainable Policies in the Venice Lagoon—the Results of a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    9. Varvara Nikulina & David Simon & Henrik Ny & Henrikke Baumann, 2019. "Context-Adapted Urban Planning for Rapid Transitioning of Personal Mobility towards Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-37, February.
    10. Tiziana Campisi & Nurten Akgün & Dario Ticali & Giovanni Tesoriere, 2020. "Exploring Public Opinion on Personal Mobility Vehicle Use: A Case Study in Palermo, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Michelini, Gabriela & Dametto, Diego & Michel, Antje, 2023. "Who is doing what and how? Descriptive analysis of the sustainable mobility planning practice in Germany," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 231-241.
    12. Pilar Jiménez & David María-Dolores & Stephany Beltrán, 2020. "An Integrative and Sustainable Workplace Mobility Plan: The Case Study of Navantia-Cartagena (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Suprava Chakraborty & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Arunkumar Jayakumar & Santanu Kumar Dash & Devaraj Elangovan, 2021. "Selected Aspects of Sustainable Mobility Reveals Implementable Approaches and Conceivable Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-31, November.
    14. Mozos-Blanco, Miguel Ángel & Pozo-Menéndez, Elisa & Arce-Ruiz, Rosa & Baucells-Aletà, Neus, 2018. "The way to sustainable mobility. A comparative analysis of sustainable mobility plans in Spain," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 45-54.
    15. Awasthi, Anjali & Omrani, Hichem & Gerber, Philippe, 2018. "Investigating ideal-solution based multicriteria decision making techniques for sustainability evaluation of urban mobility projects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 247-259.
    16. Sarbast Moslem & Tiziana Campisi & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz & Szabolcs Duleba & Kh Md Nahiduzzaman & Giovanni Tesoriere, 2020. "Best–Worst Method for Modelling Mobility Choice after COVID-19: Evidence from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    17. José Renato Barandier & Milena Bodmer & Izabella Lentino, 2017. "Evidence of the impacts of the national housing programme on the accessibility of the low‐income population in Rio de Janeiro," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(2), pages 105-118, May.
    18. Daniel Kaszubowski, 2019. "A Method for the Evaluation of Urban Freight Transport Models as a Tool for Improving the Delivery of Sustainable Urban Transport Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, March.
    19. Maurici Ruiz-Pérez & Joana Maria Seguí-Pons, 2020. "Transport Mode Choice for Residents in a Tourist Destination: The Long Road to Sustainability (the Case of Mallorca, Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-31, November.
    20. Marc Dijk & Moshe Givoni & Karen Diederiks, 2018. "Piling up or Packaging Policies? An Ex-Post Analysis of Modal Shift in Four Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1037-:d:483646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.