IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiiiy2020i4p6-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation Capability Development in Regional Entrepreneurship: The Case of Economies in Transition

Author

Listed:
  • Jasinska-Biliczak Anna
  • Kowal Jolanta

Abstract

Purpose: The first purpose of this study is to identify and explore IT professionals’ innovation capability (IC) in terms of two dimensions: organizational and individual, in regional, micro-sized, and small organizations (RMSOs) in Poland, a transition economy. The second goal is to find demographic and organizational factors which may influence IC. Design/Methodology/Approach: The authors unites an analysis comprised multiple-case studies based on mixed methods. The study employed qualitative and quantitative methods such as the method of competent judges, in-depth interviews and a structured survey as well as a combination of random and snowball sampling. On the basis of a survey among 60 IT professionals (supervisors and subordinates) the authors identified individual IC factors such as social competences, knowledge and skills, as well as organizational dimensions, such as the type of innovative change and ICT innovations. Factors influencing IC on an individual basis include position, education, age, and gender, while organizational determinants are related to organization size and location. Findings: The proposed methodology let to find the benefits for management practices in transition economies, an underestimated problem within RMSOs. Practical Implications: The current research expands the existing knowledge stream on ICT innovation capability in relation to individual socio-demographic factors and organizational factors, affecting its development in RMSOs in transition economies. This study adds potential to the implementation of the management practices in transition economies, an underestimated problem within RMSOs. Originality/Value: The authors purpose, as the novelty, the new approach of ICT innovation capability at the organizational and individual levels of an enterprise tool. We developed our previous tool – the Questionnaire of Innovation Capability (QIC). The authors defined its two dimensions, as organizational innovation capability and individual innovation capability. The use of RMSOs in transition economies yielded rich data for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasinska-Biliczak Anna & Kowal Jolanta, 2020. "Innovation Capability Development in Regional Entrepreneurship: The Case of Economies in Transition," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 6-32.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:4:p:6-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1669/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karel HavlÃ­Ä ek & Eleftherios Thalassinos & Liliana Berezkinova, 2013. "Innovation Management and Controlling in SMEs," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 57-70.
    2. Surendra Gera & Wulong Gu, 2004. "The Effect of Organizational Innovation and Information and Communications Technology on Firm Performance," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 9, pages 37-51, Fall.
    3. Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "In Search of Creative Champions in High-Tech Spaces," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-193/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Mincer, Jacob & Polachek, Solomon, 1974. "Family Investment in Human Capital: Earnings of Women," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(2), pages 76-108, Part II, .
    5. Tello-Gamarra, Jorge & Zawislak, Paulo Antônio, 2013. "Transactional capability: Innovation’s missing link," Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, Universidad ESAN, vol. 18(34), pages 2-8.
    6. repec:ers:journl:v:xvi:y:2013:i:sisme:p:57-70 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Narcyz Roztocki & H. Roland Weistroffer, 2016. "Conceptualizing and Researching the Adoption of ICT and the Impact on Socioeconomic Development," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 541-549, October.
    8. Sophia Belghiti-Mahut & Anne-Laurence Lafont & Ouidad Yousfi, 2016. "Gender gap in innovation: a confused link?," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 159-177.
    9. Gu, Wulong Gera, Surendra, 2004. "The Effect of Organizational Innovation and Information Technology on Firm Performance," The Canadian Economy in Transition 2004007e, Statistics Canada, Economic Analysis Division.
    10. Robert Huggins & Piers Thompson, 2017. "Networks and regional economic growth: A spatial analysis of knowledge ties," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(6), pages 1247-1265, June.
    11. Jolanta Kowal & Alicja Keplinger & Juho Mäkiö, 2019. "Organizational citizenship behavior of IT professionals: lessons from Poland and Germany," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 227-249, April.
    12. Jolanta Kowal & Narcyz Roztocki, 2015. "Job satisfaction of IT professionals in Poland: does business competence matter?," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 995-1012, October.
    13. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    14. Jason Henderson & Stephan Weiler, 2010. "Entrepreneurs and Job Growth: Probing the Boundaries of Time and Space," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 24(1), pages 23-32, February.
    15. Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "In Search Of Creative Champions In High-Tech Spaces: A Spatial Application Of Strategic Performance Management," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 749-777, December.
    16. Piotr Soja & Paulo Rupino da Cunha, 2015. "ICT in Transition Economies: Narrowing the Research Gap to Developed Countries," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 323-329, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boban Melović & Slavica Mitrović Veljković & Dragana Ćirović & Tamara Backović Vulić & Marina Dabić, 2022. "Entrepreneurial decision-making perspectives in transition economies – tendencies towards risky/rational decision-making," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1739-1773, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orozco, Luis Antonio & Sanabria, John Alirio & Sosa, Juan Camilo & Aristizabal, Jeimy & López, Liliana, 2022. "How do IT investments interact with other resources to improve innovation?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 358-365.
    2. Grillitsch, Markus & Schubert, Torben & Srholec, Martin, 2019. "Knowledge base combinations and firm growth," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 234-247.
    3. Richard Dion & Robert Fay, 2008. "Understanding Productivity: A Review of Recent Technical Research," Discussion Papers 08-3, Bank of Canada.
    4. Żółtaszek Agata & Pisarek Renata, 2016. "Effectiveness of National Airlines in Europe – the DEA Approach," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 103-118, December.
    5. Centre for the Study of Living Standards, 2012. "The Impact of Information and Communication Technology on the Productivity of the Canadian Transportation System: A Macroeconomic Approach for the Air and Rail Sectors," CSLS Research Reports 2012-07, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    6. Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp & Mark D. Partridge & Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "In praise of megacities in a global world," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 167-182, June.
    7. Rinaldo Evangelista & Maria Savona, 2010. "Innovation and Employment in Services," Chapters, in: Faïz Gallouj & Faridah Djellal (ed.), The Handbook of Innovation and Services, chapter 16, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Evangelista, Rinaldo & Vezzani, Antonio, 2010. "The economic impact of technological and organizational innovations. A firm-level analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1253-1263, December.
    9. Simone Sehnem & Adriane A. Farias S. L. de Queiroz & Susana Carla Farias Pereira & Gabriel dos Santos Correia & Edson Kuzma, 2022. "Circular economy and innovation: A look from the perspective of organizational capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 236-250, January.
    10. Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2018. "Impact of Cultural “Ambiance†on the Spatial Distribution of Creative Professions," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 41(1), pages 103-128, January.
    11. Żółtaszek Agata, 2014. "Leaders And Followers In The Effectiveness Of Public Safety Services In European States – A Spatial Frontier Approach," Comparative Economic Research, Sciendo, vol. 17(4), pages 253-272, December.
    12. Maria José Sousa & Miguel González-Loureiro, 2016. "Employee knowledge profiles – a mixed-research methods approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1103-1117, December.
    13. Bernhard Dachs & Martin Hud & Christian Köhler & Bettina Peters, 2016. "Employment Effects of Innovations over the Business Cycle: Firm-Level Evidence from European Countries," DEM Discussion Paper Series 16-20, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    14. Meiqi Jiao & Debin Du & Wentian Shi & Chunguang Hou & Qinchang Gui, 2021. "Dynamic Absorptive Capability and Innovation Performance: Evidence from Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    15. Meyer, Jenny, 2007. "Older Workers and the Adoption of New Technologies," ZEW Discussion Papers 07-050, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    16. Jean-Francois Arsenault & Andrew Sharpe, 2008. "An Analysis of the Causes of Weak Labour Productivity Growth in Canada since 2000," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 16, pages 14-39, Spring.
    17. MOTHE Caroline & NGUYEN Thi Thuc Uyen, 2011. "Do firms rely on sources of information for organizational innovation?," LISER Working Paper Series 2011-39, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    18. Rashid Nikzad, 2023. "Evaluation of Productivity in the Canadian Copyrightbased Industries," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 9(3), pages 273-284, July.
    19. Jakub Zawieska & Hanna Obracht-Prondzyńska & Ewa Duda & Danuta Uryga & Małgorzata Romanowska, 2022. "In Search of the Innovative Digital Solutions Enhancing Social Pro-Environmental Engagement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Samoilenko, Sergey & Osei-Bryson, Kweku-Muata, 2008. "An exploration of the effects of the interaction between ICT and labor force on economic growth in transition economies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 471-481, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovation capability; human capital; knowledge economics; region; SMEs; transition economies; entrepreneurship; Poland.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
    • J44 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Professional Labor Markets and Occupations
    • M50 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - General
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:4:p:6-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.