IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v169y2023ics1366554522003490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply chain management professionals’ proficiency in big data analytics: Antecedents and impact on performance

Author

Listed:
  • Schoenherr, Tobias

Abstract

While big data analytics (BDA) carries great potential for supply chain management (SCM), actual advanced applications of these approaches are still limited in practice. Within this context, we seek to identify what can foster an SCM professional’s proficient use of BDA, and define BDA proficiency as an individual’s ability to effectively use BDA. Grounding our research in the theoretical framework of technology acceptance, we consider perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude toward, and behavioral intention to use BDA as potential influential antecedents. Using primary survey data from 212 SCM professionals, we find that all but one of these hypothesized relationships are confirmed among the sample. This offers valuable insight on how to drive the intention of SCM professionals to use BDA, which serves as a foundation to become proficient in it. In addition, we hypothesize about the impact of BDA proficiency on generating business value in terms of both quality and cost performance, two important outcome variables in SCM research. While the impact on cost performance is confirmed, the impact on quality performance is non-significant, bringing greater clarity to the differentiated performance impacts of BDA proficiency. When further scrutinizing these links to performance under the moderating effect of environmental competitiveness, we not only find the impact of BDA proficiency on cost performance to be greater under higher levels of environmental competitiveness, but also that under such greater levels the link from BDA proficiency to quality performance becomes significant. Overall, our research provides insight not only into what can foster an SCM professional’s BDA proficiency, but also into its impact on performance under various levels of environmental competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Schoenherr, Tobias, 2023. "Supply chain management professionals’ proficiency in big data analytics: Antecedents and impact on performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:169:y:2023:i:c:s1366554522003490
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2022.102972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554522003490
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102972?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Gang & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ngai, Eric W.T. & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2016. "Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 98-110.
    2. Lin, Zhibin & Filieri, Raffaele, 2015. "Airline passengers’ continuance intention towards online check-in services: The role of personal innovativeness and subjective knowledge," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 158-168.
    3. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    4. Lu, Jin-Long & Chou, Hung-Yen & Ling, Pei-Chuan, 2009. "Investigating passengers' intentions to use technology-based self check-in services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 345-356, March.
    5. Mitręga, Maciej & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "How small-and-medium transportation companies handle asymmetric customer relationships under COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-method study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    6. Tsao, Yu-Chung, 2017. "Managing default risk under trade credit: Who should implement Big-Data analytics in supply chains?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 276-293.
    7. Stekelorum, Rebecca & Laguir, Issam & Lai, Kee-hung & Gupta, Shivam & Kumar, Ajay, 2021. "Responsible governance mechanisms and the role of suppliers’ ambidexterity and big data predictive analytics capabilities in circular economy practices improvements," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    8. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    9. Balci, Gökcay & Surucu-Balci, Ebru, 2021. "Blockchain adoption in the maritime supply chain: Examining barriers and salient stakeholders in containerized international trade," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Tsan‐Ming Choi & Stein W. Wallace & Yulan Wang, 2018. "Big Data Analytics in Operations Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(10), pages 1868-1883, October.
    11. Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Akter, Shahriar, 2020. "The performance effects of big data analytics and supply chain ambidexterity: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    12. Sumit Maheshwari & Prerna Gautam & Chandra K. Jaggi, 2021. "Role of Big Data Analytics in supply chain management: current trends and future perspectives," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(6), pages 1875-1900, March.
    13. Yang, Chung-Shan, 2019. "Maritime shipping digitalization: Blockchain-based technology applications, future improvements, and intention to use," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 108-117.
    14. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Vidgen, Richard & Shaw, Sarah & Grant, David B., 2017. "Management challenges in creating value from business analytics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 626-639.
    16. Raut, Rakesh D. & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Narwane, Vaibhav S. & Dora, Manoj & Liu, Mengqi, 2021. "Big Data Analytics as a mediator in Lean, Agile, Resilient, and Green (LARG) practices effects on sustainable supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    17. Chen, Shukai & Meng, Qiang & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2022. "Transportation research Part E-logistics and transportation review: 25 years in retrospect," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Arunachalam, Deepak & Kumar, Niraj & Kawalek, John Paul, 2018. "Understanding big data analytics capabilities in supply chain management: Unravelling the issues, challenges and implications for practice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 416-436.
    19. Donkor, Frank & Papadopoulos, Thanos & Spiegler, Virginia, 2021. "The supply chain integration – Supply chain sustainability relationship in the UK and Ghana pharmaceutical industry: A stakeholder and contingency perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Mikalef, Patrick & Boura, Maria & Lekakos, George & Krogstie, John, 2019. "Big data analytics and firm performance: Findings from a mixed-method approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 261-276.
    21. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    22. Shirley Taylor & Peter A. Todd, 1995. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 144-176, June.
    23. Chen, Xu & Wang, Xiaojun & Chan, Hing Kai, 2017. "Manufacturer and retailer coordination for environmental and economic competitiveness: A power perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 268-281.
    24. Zeng, Fangli & Chan, Hing Kai & Pawar, Kulwant, 2020. "The adoption of open platform for container bookings in the maritime supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bag, Surajit & Rahman, Muhammad Sabbir & Srivastava, Gautam & Shore, Adam & Ram, Pratibha, 2023. "Examining the role of virtue ethics and big data in enhancing viable, sustainable, and digital supply chain performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    2. Nistor, Cristian, 2013. "A conceptual model for the use of social media in companies," MPRA Paper 44224, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Al-Qeisi, Kholoud & Dennis, Charles & Alamanos, Eleftherios & Jayawardhena, Chanaka, 2014. "Website design quality and usage behavior: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2282-2290.
    4. Oghuma, Apollos Patricks & Chang, Younghoon & Libaque-Saenz, Christian Fernando & Park, Myeong-Cheol & Rho, Jae Jeung, 2015. "Benefit-confirmation model for post-adoption behavior of mobile instant messaging applications: A comparative analysis of KakaoTalk and Joyn in Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 658-677.
    5. Juan F. Tavera Mesías & Juan C. Sánchez Giraldo & Bernardo Ballesteros Díaz, 2011. "Aceptación del E-Commerce en Colombia: un estudio para la ciudad de Medellín," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, December.
    6. Deborah Compeau & Barbara Marcolin & Helen Kelley & Chris Higgins, 2012. "Research Commentary ---Generalizability of Information Systems Research Using Student Subjects---A Reflection on Our Practices and Recommendations for Future Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1093-1109, December.
    7. Tamara Dinev & Paul Hart, 2006. "An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 61-80, March.
    8. Mariani, Marcello M. & Ek Styven, Maria & Teulon, Fréderic, 2021. "Explaining the intention to use digital personal data stores: An empirical study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    9. Wai-Ming To & Peter K C Lee & King-Hang Lam, 2018. "Building professionals’ intention to use smart and sustainable building technologies – An empirical study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Banita Lal & Michael D. Williams & Marc Clement, 2017. "Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 549-568, June.
    11. Türker, Cansu & Altay, Burak Can & Okumuş, Abdullah, 2022. "Understanding user acceptance of QR code mobile payment systems in Turkey: An extended TAM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    12. Andrei OGREZEANU, 2015. "Models Of Technology Adoption: An Integrative Approach," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 5, pages 55-67, June.
    13. Iviane Ramos-de-Luna & Francisco Montoro-Ríos & Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas, 2016. "Determinants of the intention to use NFC technology as a payment system: an acceptance model approach," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-314, May.
    14. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2021. "An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    15. Wajeeha Aslam & Marija Ham & Imtiaz Arif, 2017. "Consumer Behavioral Intentions towards Mobile Payment Services: An Empirical Analysis in Pakistan," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 29(2), pages 161-176.
    16. Cansu TÜRKER & Abdullah OKUMUŞ, 2019. "Mobil Ödeme Kullanımına Yönelik Niyet ve Algıların SosyoDemografik Özelliklere Göre Farklılıklarının İncelenmesi," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(87), pages 111-139, December.
    17. Hsiao, Chun Hua & Yang, Chyan, 2011. "The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 128-136.
    18. Christopher R. Plouffe & John S. Hulland & Mark Vandenbosch, 2001. "Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions—Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 208-222, June.
    19. Jun Hwan Kim & Woon-Kyung Song & Hyun Cheol Lee, 2023. "Exploring the Determinants of Travelers’ Intention to Use the Airport Biometric System: A Korean Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.
    20. Sung S. Kim & Naresh K. Malhotra, 2005. "A Longitudinal Model of Continued IS Use: An Integrative View of Four Mechanisms Underlying Postadoption Phenomena," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 741-755, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:169:y:2023:i:c:s1366554522003490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.