IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v167y2023ics0965856422003147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anger between bus drivers and passengers or among passengers: Development of a bus passenger anger scale (BPAS) and a bus driver anger scale (BDAS)

Author

Listed:
  • Ye, Shi
  • Chen, Qun
  • Tang, Yi

Abstract

In China, numerous fatal accidents have occurred due to anger caused by conflicts between the driver and passengers or among passengers on buses. Nonetheless, based on existing knowledge, there is no tool available to measure the anger experience of passengers and drivers. The existing driving anger scale (DAS) can be applied only to assess a driver’s tendency to experience driving anger in driving-related scenarios, such as traffic obstruction, others’ illegal driving and pedestrians illegally crossing, which often happen outside the vehicle. This study developed a bus passenger anger scale (BPAS) and a bus driver anger scale (BDAS) for measuring the anger experience of drivers and passengers in various conflict situations that occur on buses. The results of two independent surveys involving 384 passengers and 414 drivers indicate that the BPAS measures four dimensions of bus passenger anger, including drivers' or passengers' rude behavior, mutual hostility, unintentional behavior, and passengers' violations, and that the BDAS measures four dimensions of driver anger, including passengers' rude behavior, hostility between the driver and passengers, passengers' extreme behavior, and drivers' violations. Through exploratory principal component analysis (PCA) and reliability analysis, two reliable scales that can be used to measure drivers’ or passengers’ experiences of anger were constructed. The BPAS contains 22 items and 4 factors, and the BDAS contains 21 items and 4 factors. Data analysis revealed that, compared to the level of driving anger provoked by stimulators outside the vehicle, which has been extensively studied by previous researchers, the level of bus driver anger caused by passenger-driver conflicts was higher. Furthermore, bus passenger anger was more inclined to be triggered by mutual hostility and other persons’ rude behaviors. Passengers’ extreme behaviors elicited the highest driver anger rating from drivers. Finally, a correlation analysis indicated that older passengers and older drivers were less inclined to become angry when encountering anger-provoking situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye, Shi & Chen, Qun & Tang, Yi, 2023. "Anger between bus drivers and passengers or among passengers: Development of a bus passenger anger scale (BPAS) and a bus driver anger scale (BDAS)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:167:y:2023:i:c:s0965856422003147
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.103563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856422003147
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2022.103563?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quy Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy & Nguyen, Teron & Ngoc Su, Diep & Thi Le, Phuong & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2022. "How do social cues from other passengers affect word-of-mouth and intention to continue using bus services? A second-order SEM approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 302-320.
    2. John Horn, 1965. "A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 30(2), pages 179-185, June.
    3. Henry Kaiser, 1970. "A second generation little jiffy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(4), pages 401-415, December.
    4. Chen, Huey-Kuo & Chou, Huey-Wen & Su, Jin-Wei & Wen, Fur-Hsing, 2019. "Structural interrelationships of safety climate, stress, inattention and aberrant driving behavior for bus drivers in Taiwan," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 118-133.
    5. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Q. & Phuong Tran, Anh Thi & Nguyen, Tiep Van & Le, Phuong Thi & Su, Diep Ngoc, 2021. "Investigating the complexity of perceived service quality and perceived safety and security in building loyalty among bus passengers in Vietnam – A PLS-SEM approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 162-173.
    6. Ganji, S.S. & Ahangar, A.N. & Awasthi, Anjali & Jamshidi Bandari, Smaneh, 2021. "Psychological analysis of intercity bus passenger satisfaction using Q methodology," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 345-363.
    7. Nègre, Julien & Delhomme, Patricia, 2017. "Drivers’ self-perceptions about being an eco-driver according to their concern for the environment, beliefs on eco-driving, and driving behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 95-105.
    8. Zhao, Xing & Ji, Kang & Xu, Peng & Qian, Wen-wen & Ren, Gang & Shan, Xiao-nian, 2020. "A round-trip bus evacuation model with scheduling and routing planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 285-300.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jasna Mesarić & Diana Šimić & Milica Katić & Ellen Catharina Tveter Deilkås & Dag Hofoss & Gunnar Tschudi Bondevik, 2020. "The safety attitudes questionnaire for out-of-hours service in primary healthcare—Psychometric properties of the Croatian version," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Chandler, Gaylen N. & DeTienne, Dawn R. & McKelvie, Alexander & Mumford, Troy V., 2011. "Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 375-390, May.
    3. Hamed Taherdoost & Shamsul Sahibuddin & Neda Jalaliyoon, 2014. "Exploratory Factor Analysis; Concepts and Theory," Post-Print hal-02557344, HAL.
    4. Szymon Zaleski & Rafał Michalski, 2021. "Success Factors in Sustainable Management of IT Service Projects: Exploratory Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Jens Jirschitzka & Aileen Oeberst & Richard Göllner & Ulrike Cress, 2017. "Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 1059-1092, November.
    6. Stefan Schulenberg & Amanda Melton, 2010. "A Confirmatory Factor-Analytic Evaluation of the Purpose in Life Test: Preliminary Psychometric Support for a Replicable Two-Factor Model," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 95-111, March.
    7. Sati Bozkurt & Gizem B. Ekitli & Christopher L. Thomas & Jerrell C. Cassady, 2017. "Validation of the Turkish Version of the Cognitive Test Anxiety Scale–Revised," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440166, January.
    8. Lambert, Stephanie A. & Herbert, Ian P. & Rothwell, Andrew T., 2020. "Rethinking the Career Anchors Inventory framework with insights from a finance transformation field study," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    9. Venus, Thomas J. & Drabik, Dusan & Wesseler, Justus, 2018. "The role of a German multi-stakeholder standard for livestock products derived from non-GMO feed," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 58-67.
    10. Hannah Han & Fan Yang & Sarah Murray & Gaspar Mbita & Maggie Bangser & Katherine Rucinski & Albert Komba & Caterina Casalini & Mary Drake & Esther Majani & Kelly Curran & Yeronimo Mlawa & Agnes Junga , 2021. "Characterizing a sexual health and HIV risk stratification scale for sexually active adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Tanzania," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Agyeman, Stephen & Cheng, Lin, 2020. "Analysis of barriers to perceived service quality in Ghana: Students’ perspectives on bus mobility attributes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 63-85.
    12. Muhammad Fadhlullah Abu Bakar & Shuhairy Norhisham & Herda Yati Katman & Chow Ming Fai & Nor Najwa Irina Mohd Azlan & Nur Sarah Shaziah Samsudin, 2022. "Service Quality of Bus Performance in Asia: A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Henner Gimpel & Tobias Manner-Romberg & Fabian Schmied & Till J. Winkler, 2021. "Understanding the evaluation of mHealth app features based on a cross-country Kano analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(4), pages 765-794, December.
    14. Jed A. Long & Jinhyung Lee & Darja Reuschke, 2023. "Activity graphs: Spatial graphs as a framework for quantifying individual mobility," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 377-402, July.
    15. Lau Lilleholt & Ingo Zettler & Cornelia Betsch & Robert Böhm, 2023. "Development and validation of the pandemic fatigue scale," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    16. David Říha & Timothy Heinze & Michael Stros, 2017. "Intercultural Variations in Personal Sales Factors in the Czech and U.S. Automotive Markets: Practical Implications for Marketing," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(1), pages 26-47.
    17. Andrea C Vial & Janine Bosak & Patrick C Flood & John F Dovidio, 2021. "Individual variation in role construal predicts responses to third-party biases in hiring contexts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-28, February.
    18. Maria Lidia Mascia & Mirian Agus & Łukasz Tomczyk & Natale Salvatore Bonfiglio & Diego Bellini & Maria Pietronilla Penna, 2023. "Smartphone Distraction: Italian Validation of the Smartphone Distraction Scale (SDS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-15, August.
    19. Patrick Hylton & Ben Kisby & Paul Goddard, 2018. "Young People’s Citizen Identities: A Q-Methodological Analysis of English Youth Perceptions of Citizenship in Britain," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Siwarit Pongsakornrungsilp & Pimlapas Pongsakornrungsilp & Theeranuch Pusaksrikit & Pimmada Wichasin & Vikas Kumar, 2021. "Co-Creating a Sustainable Regional Brand from Multiple Sub-Brands: The Andaman Tourism Cluster of Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Anger; Bus driver; Passenger; Survey;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:167:y:2023:i:c:s0965856422003147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.