IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v153y2021icp130-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A modeling framework for designing and evaluating curbside traffic management policies at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport

Author

Listed:
  • Ugirumurera, Juliette
  • Severino, Joseph
  • Ficenec, Karen
  • Ge, Yanbo
  • Wang, Qichao
  • Williams, Lindy
  • Chae, Junghoon
  • Lunacek, Monte
  • Phillips, Caleb

Abstract

Emerging mobility technologies are changing the transportation system landscape. This is especially evident at airports, such as the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport (DFW). Without careful analysis, these changes could lead to inefficient and costly airport operations. This paper presents a modeling framework that integrates travel mode encoding, demand projection, and microsimulation to enable airports to develop, simulate, and evaluate curbside traffic managements policies and measure their impact. The framework is utilized to analyze several traffic scenarios and policies for DFW: a baseline scenario which represents DFW traffic pattern as observed in 2018 and projected to 2045, a transit network company (TNC) electrification policy, a TNC queuing policy, a policy that increased transit ridership, a bus-only policy which considers the use of only buses inside DFW, an autonomous vehicle (AV) policy which investigates the impact of autonomous vehicle (AV) adoption on airport operations, and an example COVID-19 scenario which models the impact of the COVID19 pandemic. The simulations’ results demonstrate that: increasing the DFW transit ridership postpones the need for airport curbside expansion the most; encouraging shared-mobility with the bus-only policy produces the most savings in curbside congestion delays; automation and electrification for all passenger vehicle trips to/from DFW generates the most saving in fuel consumption and emissions; and uncontrolled AV adoption incurs the highest increase in fuel consumption, delay, and emissions and could require immediate airport capacity extension. Without policy intervention or investment in additional infrastructure capacity, these results predict the current operations would face significant congestion on high demand days starting as early as 2028. While derived in close partnership with DFW, the methodology presented here can be generalized to any airport.

Suggested Citation

  • Ugirumurera, Juliette & Severino, Joseph & Ficenec, Karen & Ge, Yanbo & Wang, Qichao & Williams, Lindy & Chae, Junghoon & Lunacek, Monte & Phillips, Caleb, 2021. "A modeling framework for designing and evaluating curbside traffic management policies at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 130-150.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:153:y:2021:i:c:p:130-150
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.07.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856421001956
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2021.07.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anil Yazici, M. & Kamga, Camille & Singhal, Abhishek, 2016. "Modeling taxi drivers’ decisions for improving airport ground access: John F. Kennedy airport case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 48-60.
    2. Tsamboulas, D. & Evmorfopoulos, A.P. & Moraiti, P., 2012. "Modeling airport employees commuting mode choice," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 74-77.
    3. Czerny, Achim I., 2010. "Airport congestion management under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 371-380, March.
    4. Joseph I. Daniel, 2011. "Congestion pricing of Canadian airports," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 44(1), pages 290-324, February.
    5. Ison, Stephen & Merkert, Rico & Mulley, Corinne, 2014. "Policy approaches to public transport at airports—Some diverging evidence from the UK and Australia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 265-274.
    6. Martin Fellendorf & Peter Vortisch, 2010. "Microscopic Traffic Flow Simulator VISSIM," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Jaume Barceló (ed.), Fundamentals of Traffic Simulation, chapter 0, pages 63-93, Springer.
    7. Ison, Stephen & Humphreys, Ian & Rye, Tom, 2007. "UK airport employee car parking: The role of a charge?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 163-165.
    8. Akar, Gulsah, 2013. "Ground access to airports, case study: Port Columbus International Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 25-31.
    9. Jan K. Brueckner, 2002. "Airport Congestion When Carriers Have Market Power," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(5), pages 1357-1375, December.
    10. Iikka Korhonen, 2019. "Differences in Transition Paths: Russia versus China," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 17(03), pages 17-21, October.
    11. Budd, Lucy & Ison, Stephen & Budd, Thomas, 2016. "Improving the environmental performance of airport surface access in the UK: The role of public transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 185-195.
    12. Jou, Rong-Chang & Hensher, David A. & Hsu, Tzu-Lan, 2011. "Airport ground access mode choice behavior after the introduction of a new mode: A case study of Taoyuan International Airport in Taiwan," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 371-381, May.
    13. Martí Garçon & Clare Bakewell & George A. Sackman & Andrew J. P. White & Richard I. Cooper & Alison J. Edwards & Mark R. Crimmin, 2019. "A hexagonal planar transition-metal complex," Nature, Nature, vol. 574(7778), pages 390-393, October.
    14. Morgan S. A. Gilman & Polina Furmanova-Hollenstein & Gabriel Pascual & Angélique van ‘t Wout & Johannes P. M. Langedijk & Jason S. McLellan, 2019. "Transient opening of trimeric prefusion RSV F proteins," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Budd, Thomas & Ryley, Tim & Ison, Stephen, 2014. "Airport ground access and private car use: a segmentation analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 106-115.
    16. Hamzawi, Salah G., 1992. "Lack of airport capacity: Exploration of alternative solutions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 47-58, January.
    17. Madas, Michael A. & Zografos, Konstantinos G., 2010. "Airport slot allocation: a time for change?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 274-285, August.
    18. Wadud, Zia, 2020. "An examination of the effects of ride-hailing services on airport parking demand," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yazdanpanah, Mahdi & Hosseinlou, Mansour Hadji, 2016. "The influence of personality traits on airport public transport access mode choice: A hybrid latent class choice modeling approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 147-163.
    2. Zaidan, Esmat & Abulibdeh, Ammar, 2018. "Modeling ground access mode choice behavior for Hamad International Airport in the 2022 FIFA World Cup city, Doha, Qatar," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 32-45.
    3. Qin, Huanmei & Gao, Jianqiang & Zhang, Guohui & Chen, Yanyan & Wu, Songhua, 2017. "Nested logit model formation to analyze airport parking behavior based on stated preference survey studies," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 164-175.
    4. Lin, Ming Hsin & Zhang, Anming, 2016. "Hub congestion pricing: Discriminatory passenger charges," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 37-48.
    5. Noto, Claudio, 2020. "Airport slots, secondary trading, and congestion pricing at an airport with a dominant network airline," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Madio, Leonardo, 2017. "High-speed rail, inter-modal substitution and willingness-to-pay. A stated preference analysis for the ‘Bari-Rome’," Working Papers 17_6, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica.
    7. Wang, Zi-Jia & Jia, Hui-Hui & Dai, Fangzhou & Diao, Mi, 2022. "Understanding the ground access and airport choice behavior of air passengers using transit payment transaction data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 179-190.
    8. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Capurso, Mauro & Hess, Stephane, 2017. "Modelling regional accessibility towards airports using discrete choice models: an application to the Apulian airport system," Working Papers 17_4, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica.
    9. Aleksandra Colovic & Salvatore Gabriele Pilone & Katarina Kukić & Milica Kalić & Slavica Dožić & Danica Babić & Michele Ottomanelli, 2022. "Airport Access Mode Choice: Analysis of Passengers’ Behavior in European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    10. Sigler, Devon & Wang, Qichao & Liu, Zhaocai & Garikapati, Venu & Kotz, Andrew & Kelly, Kenneth J. & Lunacek, Monte & Phillips, Caleb, 2021. "Route optimization for energy efficient airport shuttle operations – A case study from Dallas Fort worth International Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. Hu, Rong & Chen, Lin & Zheng, Lijun, 2018. "Congestion pricing and environmental cost at Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 126-132.
    12. Gokasar, Ilgin & Gunay, Gurkan, 2017. "Mode choice behavior modeling of ground access to airports: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-7.
    13. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Capurso, Mauro & Hess, Stephane, 2020. "Modelling regional accessibility to airports using discrete choice models: An application to a system of regional airports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 855-871.
    14. Wadud, Zia, 2020. "An examination of the effects of ride-hailing services on airport parking demand," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    15. Kristoffersson, Ida & Berglund , Svante, 2020. "Modelling connection trips to long-distance travel : state-of-the-art and directions for future research," Papers 2020:5, Research Programme in Transport Economics.
    16. Raúl Hernández-Martín & Hugo Padrón-Ávila, 2021. "The Carbon Footprint of Airport Ground Access as Part of an Outbound Holiday Trip," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    17. Sheng, Dian & Li, Zhi-Chun & Fu, Xiaowen, 2019. "Modeling the effects of airline slot hoarding behavior under the grandfather rights with use-it-or-lose-it rule," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 48-61.
    18. Xingjian Liu, 2020. "Assessing airport ground access by public transport in Chinese cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 267-285, February.
    19. Zhang, Anming & Czerny, Achim I., 2012. "Airports and airlines economics and policy: An interpretive review of recent research," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 15-34.
    20. Yang, Chih-Wen & Liao, Pei-Han, 2016. "Modeling the joint choice of access modes and flight routes with parallel structure and random heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 19-31.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:153:y:2021:i:c:p:130-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.