IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v190y2023ics0040162523000549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding experiences of food-delivery-platform workers under algorithmic management using topic modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Won, Jongho
  • Lee, Daeho
  • Lee, Junmin

Abstract

With the emergence of COVID-19, the food-delivery market has grown and now employs large numbers of people as drivers. The independent contractors enjoy flexibility, but their schedules are at the mercy of algorithmic management. This study explores the experiences of food-delivery-platform workers with algorithmic management and their perceptions in response to algorithmic decisions. A collection of 1046 posts containing “AI” (for artificial intelligence) and “algorithm” made to online communities frequently used by platform workers is subjected to keyword analysis, semantic network analysis, and topic modeling using latent Dirichlet allocation. Fifteen latent topics are classified into AI matching, driver behavior, and platform system, and discussed using representative posts from online communities. The results highlight the advancement of AI technology and collaboration strategies used by platform operators to generate trust in algorithmic decisions among food-delivery-platform workers. In addition, this study uses using topic modeling to comprehensively and objectively explore how food-delivery-platform workers with experience working under AI algorithmic management perceive that management.

Suggested Citation

  • Won, Jongho & Lee, Daeho & Lee, Junmin, 2023. "Understanding experiences of food-delivery-platform workers under algorithmic management using topic modeling," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:190:y:2023:i:c:s0040162523000549
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162523000549
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122369?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandy Q. Qu & John Dumay, 2011. "The qualitative research interview," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(3), pages 238-264, August.
    2. Sandy Q. Qu & John Dumay, 2011. "The qualitative research interview," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(3), pages 238-264, August.
    3. Anja Lambrecht & Catherine Tucker, 2019. "Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 2966-2981, July.
    4. Muhammad Umar & Yan Xu & Sultan Sikandar Mirza, 2021. "The impact of Covid-19 on Gig economy," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 2284-2296, January.
    5. Newman, David T. & Fast, Nathanael J. & Harmon, Derek J., 2020. "When eliminating bias isn’t fair: Algorithmic reductionism and procedural justice in human resource decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 149-167.
    6. Jonathan Woodside & Tara Vinodrai & Markus Moos, 2021. "Bottom-up strategies, platform worker power and local action: Learning from ridehailing drivers," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(4), pages 325-343, June.
    7. Berger, Thor & Chen, Chinchih & Frey, Carl Benedikt, 2018. "Drivers of disruption? Estimating the Uber effect," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 197-210.
    8. Cao, Guangming & Duan, Yanqing & Edwards, John S. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2021. "Understanding managers’ attitudes and behavioral intentions towards using artificial intelligence for organizational decision-making," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    9. Andrew Stewart & Jim Stanford, 2017. "Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(3), pages 420-437, September.
    10. Markus Blut & Cheng Wang & Nancy V. Wünderlich & Christian Brock, 2021. "Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: a meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 632-658, July.
    11. Cram, Alec W. & Wiener, Martin & Tarafdar, Monideepa & Benlian, Alexander, 2020. "Algorithmic Controls and their Implications for Gig Worker Well-being and Behavior," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 124127, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    12. Brian Fabo & Jovana Karanovic & Katerina Dukova, 2017. "In search of an adequate European policy response to the platform economy," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(2), pages 163-175, May.
    13. Arianna Tassinari & Vincenzo Maccarrone, 2020. "Riders on the Storm: Workplace Solidarity among Gig Economy Couriers in Italy and the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(1), pages 35-54, February.
    14. Sophia Galiere, 2020. "When food‐delivery platform workers consent to algorithmic management: a Foucauldian perspective," Post-Print hal-03131338, HAL.
    15. Jiang, Jennifer & Adam, Martin & Benlian, Alexander, 2021. "Algoactivistic Practices in Ridesharing - A Topic Modeling & Grounded Theory Approach," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 126522, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    16. Lammi, Minna & Pantzar, Mika, 2019. "The data economy: How technological change has altered the role of the citizen-consumer," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Ahmed, Syed Ishtiaque & Smolander, Kari, 2022. "What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Tom Barratt & Caleb Goods & Alex Veen, 2020. "‘I’m my own boss…’: Active intermediation and ‘entrepreneurial’ worker agency in the Australian gig-economy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(8), pages 1643-1661, November.
    3. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    4. Nordin, Fredrik & Ravald, Annika, 2023. "The making of marketing decisions in modern marketing environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Volkmar, Gioia & Fischer, Peter M. & Reinecke, Sven, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: Exploring drivers, barriers, and future developments in marketing management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 599-614.
    6. Nawaz, Muhammad Zahid & Nawaz, Shahid & Guzmán, Francisco & Plotkina, Daria, 2023. "The aftermath of Covid-19: The rise of pandemic animosity among consumers and its scale development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    7. Juan Francisco Velasco-Muñoz & José Ángel Aznar-Sánchez & Belén López-Felices & Gabriella Balacco, 2022. "Adopting sustainable water management practices in agriculture based on stakeholder preferences," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(9), pages 317-326.
    8. Emmanouil Papagiannidis & Ida Merete Enholm & Chirstian Dremel & Patrick Mikalef & John Krogstie, 2023. "Toward AI Governance: Identifying Best Practices and Potential Barriers and Outcomes," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 123-141, February.
    9. Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Maglietta, Amedeo & Oropallo, Eugenio, 2023. "Sailing through a digital and resilient shipbuilding supply chain: An empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Tan, Zhi Ming & Aggarwal, Nikita & Cowls, Josh & Morley, Jessica & Taddeo, Mariarosaria & Floridi, Luciano, 2021. "The ethical debate about the gig economy: A review and critical analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Gill, Chelsea & Mehrotra, Vishal & Moses, Olayinka & Bui, Binh, 2023. "The impact of the pitching research framework on AFAANZ grant applications," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    12. Rebecca Reynolds & Julie Aromi & Catherine McGowan & Britt Paris, 2022. "Digital divide, critical‐, and crisis‐informatics perspectives on K‐12 emergency remote teaching during the pandemic," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(12), pages 1665-1680, December.
    13. Fumagalli, Elena & Rezaei, Sarah & Salomons, Anna, 2022. "OK computer: Worker perceptions of algorithmic recruitment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    14. Radosław Malik & Anna Visvizi & Małgorzata Skrzek-Lubasińska, 2021. "The Gig Economy: Current Issues, the Debate, and the New Avenues of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Sarah Spiekermann-Hoff & Hanna Krasnova & Oliver Hinz, 2021. "Call for Papers, Issue 5/2023," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(4), pages 479-481, August.
    16. Jean-Philippe Deranty & Thomas Corbin, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence and work: a critical review of recent research from the social sciences," Papers 2204.00419, arXiv.org.
    17. Schuster, Roseanne C. & Brewis, Alexandra & Wutich, Amber & Safi, Christelle & Vanrespaille, Teresa Elegido & Bowen, Gina & SturtzSreetharan, Cindi & McDaniel, Anne & Ochandarena, Peggy, 2023. "Individual interviews versus focus groups for evaluations of international development programs: Systematic testing of method performance to elicit sensitive information in a justice study in Haiti," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    18. Venturelli, Andrea & Ligorio, Lorenzo & de Nuccio, Elbano, 2023. "Biodiversity accountability in water utilities: A case study," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. Darima Fotheringham & Michael A. Wiles, 2023. "The effect of implementing chatbot customer service on stock returns: an event study analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 802-822, July.
    20. Iftekhairul Islam & Fahad Shaon, 2020. "If the Prospect of Some Occupations Are Stagnating With Technological Advancement? A Task Attribute Approach to Detect Employment Vulnerability," Papers 2001.02783, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:190:y:2023:i:c:s0040162523000549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.