IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v185y2022ics0040162522005601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who is responsible for customers’ privacy? Effects of first versus third party handling of privacy contracts on continuance intentions

Author

Listed:
  • Bayerl, Petra Saskia
  • Jacobs, Gabriele

Abstract

E-commerce data management has become an extensive network of interrelated players that links companies providing goods or services (first parties) with companies that analyse, manage or otherwise use customers’ data (third parties). In consequence, privacy is now the combined responsibility of first and third parties. We introduce the concept of privacy contract to investigate the effect of first versus third party privacy handling on customer reactions, including privacy contract fulfilment versus privacy contract breach. An online experiment with 296 participants confirmed that differences in privacy contract handling affects continuance intentions. This link is mediated through perceived contract fulfilment and feelings of violation. Although first party actions led to somewhat stronger reactions, both first and third party privacy contract (mis)handling affected continuance intentions and cognitive and affective reactions. Our findings demonstrate that individuals make little distinction between first and third party responsibilities, indicating that privacy contracts extend beyond the original relationship between customer and online retailer. It further demonstrates that privacy contracts offer a strong theoretical framework to understand customer reactions across different privacy situations. Conceptually, our study shifts privacy from a dualistic towards a network perspective of subjectively held privacy obligations, offering important pointers to guide organizations’ privacy management.

Suggested Citation

  • Bayerl, Petra Saskia & Jacobs, Gabriele, 2022. "Who is responsible for customers’ privacy? Effects of first versus third party handling of privacy contracts on continuance intentions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:185:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522005601
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162522005601
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jessica Rose Carre & Shelby R. Curtis & Daniel Nelson Jones, 2018. "Ascribing responsibility for online security and data breaches," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 436-446, March.
    2. Shahriar Akter & Samuel Fosso Wamba, 2016. "Big data analytics in E-commerce: a systematic review and agenda for future research," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(2), pages 173-194, May.
    3. Gregory S. Dawson & Elena Karahanna & Ann Buchholtz, 2014. "A Study of Psychological Contract Breach Spillover in Multiple-Agency Relationships in Consulting Professional Service Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 149-170, February.
    4. Yin, Fa-Shing & Liu, Min-Ling & Lin, Chieh-Peng, 2015. "Forecasting the continuance intention of social networking sites: Assessing privacy risk and usefulness of technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 267-272.
    5. Lin Guo & Thomas W. Gruen & Chuanyi Tang, 2017. "Seeing relationships through the lens of psychological contracts: the structure of consumer service relationships," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 357-376, May.
    6. Stephanie Eckerd & Kenneth K. Boyer & Yinan Qi & Adam Eckerd & James A. Hill, 2016. "Supply Chain Psychological Contract Breach: An Experimental Study across National Cultures," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(3), pages 68-82, July.
    7. Ernst Fehr & Urs Fischbacher, "undated". "Third Party Punishment and Social Norms," IEW - Working Papers 106, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    8. Lin, Trisha T.C. & Paragas, Fernando & Goh, Dion & Bautista, John Robert, 2016. "Developing location-based mobile advertising in Singapore: A socio-technical perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 334-349.
    9. repec:eme:maj000:maj-11-2017-1693 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Gurumurthy, Krishna Murthy & Kockelman, Kara M., 2020. "Modeling Americans’ autonomous vehicle preferences: A focus on dynamic ride-sharing, privacy & long-distance mode choices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    11. Wajeeha Aslam & Annas Hussain & Kashif Farhat & Imtiaz Arif, 2020. "Underlying Factors Influencing Consumers’ Trust and Loyalty in E-commerce," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 8(2), pages 186-204, July.
    12. Malhotra, Neeru & Sahadev, Sunil & Purani, Keyoor, 2017. "Psychological contract violation and customer intention to reuse online retailers: Exploring mediating and moderating mechanisms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 17-28.
    13. Jillian J. Jordan & Moshe Hoffman & Paul Bloom & David G. Rand, 2016. "Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness," Nature, Nature, vol. 530(7591), pages 473-476, February.
    14. Toufaily, Elissar & Ricard, Line & Perrien, Jean, 2013. "Customer loyalty to a commercial website: Descriptive meta-analysis of the empirical literature and proposal of an integrative model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1436-1447.
    15. Grappi, Silvia & Romani, Simona & Bagozzi, Richard P., 2013. "Consumer response to corporate irresponsible behavior: Moral emotions and virtues," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1814-1821.
    16. Paul A. Pavlou & David Gefen, 2005. "Psychological Contract Violation in Online Marketplaces: Antecedents, Consequences, and Moderating Role," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 372-399, December.
    17. Janice Y. Tsai & Serge Egelman & Lorrie Cranor & Alessandro Acquisti, 2011. "The Effect of Online Privacy Information on Purchasing Behavior: An Experimental Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 254-268, June.
    18. Berinsky, Adam J. & Huber, Gregory A. & Lenz, Gabriel S., 2012. "Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 351-368, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valerio Capraro & Hélène Barcelo, 2021. "Punishing defectors and rewarding cooperators: Do people discriminate between genders?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(1), pages 19-32, September.
    2. Abid, Aman & Harrigan, Paul, 2020. "An exploration of social media-enabled voter relationships through uses and gratifications theory, psychological contract and service-dominant orientation," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 71-82.
    3. Wang, Yonggui & Zhang, Lu, 2021. "How customer entitlement influences supplier performance in B2B relationships in emerging economy? A moderated mediation model of institutional environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 689-700.
    4. Neeru Malhotra & Sunil Sahadev & P. S. H. Leeflang & Keyoor Purani, 2021. "New Insights into e-Loyalty of Internet Banking Users in an Emerging Market Context: A Multilevel Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 1521-1536, December.
    5. Hongyan LIU & Jinglan Yang & Xiaoxi Chen, 2020. "Making the Customer-Brand Relationship Sustainable: The Different Effects of Psychological Contract Breach Types on Customer Citizenship Behaviours," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Hensel, Lukas & Witte, Marc & Caria, A. Stefano & Fetzer, Thiemo & Fiorin, Stefano & Götz, Friedrich M. & Gomez, Margarita & Haushofer, Johannes & Ivchenko, Andriy & Kraft-Todd, Gordon & Reutskaja, El, 2022. "Global Behaviors, Perceptions, and the Emergence of Social Norms at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 473-496.
    7. Julia Hartmann & Sebastian Forkmann & Sabine Benoit & Stephan C. Henneberg, 2022. "A consumer perspective on managing the consequences of chain liability," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(4), pages 58-89, October.
    8. Yasuhiro Kanakogi & Michiko Miyazaki & Hideyuki Takahashi & Hiroki Yamamoto & Tessei Kobayashi & Kazuo Hiraki, 2022. "Third-party punishment by preverbal infants," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 1234-1242, September.
    9. Jan Hendrik Betzing & Matthias Tietz & Jan Brocke & Jörg Becker, 2020. "The impact of transparency on mobile privacy decision making," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 607-625, September.
    10. Xu, Xun & Jackson, Jonathan E., 2019. "Examining customer channel selection intention in the omni-channel retail environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 434-445.
    11. David Chavanne, 2018. "Generalized Trust, Need for Cognitive Closure, and the Perceived Acceptability of Personal Data Collection," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Wladislaw Mill & Jonathan Staebler, 2023. "Spite in Litigation," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2023_401, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    13. Overstreet, Robert E. & Morgan, Tyler R. & Laczniak, Russell N. & Daugherty, Patricia J., 2022. "Stemming the tide of increasing retail returns: Implications of targeted returns policies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 551-562.
    14. Damian Clarke & Sonia Oreffice & Climent Quintana‐Domeque, 2021. "On the Value of Birth Weight," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 83(5), pages 1130-1159, October.
    15. Gong, Taeshik & Wang, Chen-Ya & Lee, Kangcheol, 2022. "Effects of characteristics of in-store retail technology on customer citizenship behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    16. Ruwan Bandara & Mario Fernando & Shahriar Akter, 2020. "Privacy concerns in E-commerce: A taxonomy and a future research agenda," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 629-647, September.
    17. Hezhi Chen & Zhijia Zeng & Jianhong Ma, 2020. "The source of punishment matters: Third-party punishment restrains observers from selfish behaviors better than does second-party punishment by shaping norm perceptions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-10, March.
    18. Rong Liu & Jiawei Yang & Jifei Wu, 2022. "When Big Data Backfires: The Impact of a Perceived Privacy Breach by Pharmaceutical E-Retailers on Customer Boycott Intention in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-13, April.
    19. Hoem Sjursen, Ingrid, 2018. "Accountability and taxation: Experimental evidence," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 24/2018, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    20. Cai, Han & Mardani, Abbas, 2023. "Research on the impact of consumer privacy and intelligent personalization technology on purchase resistance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:185:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522005601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.